سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

Mahdi, Reza, Keykha, Ahmad, Rahmani Barouji, Parinaz. (1402). Identifying the challenges of the regulations for the promotion of faculty members in Universities of Medical Sciences: A meta synthesis of existing studies. , 13(3), 36-40. doi: 10.22038/fmej.2023.69686.1520
Reza Mahdi; Ahmad Keykha; Parinaz Rahmani Barouji. "Identifying the challenges of the regulations for the promotion of faculty members in Universities of Medical Sciences: A meta synthesis of existing studies". , 13, 3, 1402, 36-40. doi: 10.22038/fmej.2023.69686.1520
Mahdi, Reza, Keykha, Ahmad, Rahmani Barouji, Parinaz. (1402). 'Identifying the challenges of the regulations for the promotion of faculty members in Universities of Medical Sciences: A meta synthesis of existing studies', , 13(3), pp. 36-40. doi: 10.22038/fmej.2023.69686.1520
Mahdi, Reza, Keykha, Ahmad, Rahmani Barouji, Parinaz. Identifying the challenges of the regulations for the promotion of faculty members in Universities of Medical Sciences: A meta synthesis of existing studies. , 1402; 13(3): 36-40. doi: 10.22038/fmej.2023.69686.1520

Identifying the challenges of the regulations for the promotion of faculty members in Universities of Medical Sciences: A meta synthesis of existing studies

Future of Medical Education Journal
مقاله 6، دوره 13، شماره 3، آذر 2023، صفحه 36-40    اصل مقاله (619.23 K)
نوع مقاله: Systematic review/Meta analysis
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/fmej.2023.69686.1520
نویسندگان
Reza Mahdi1؛ Ahmad Keykha2؛ Parinaz Rahmani Barouji* 3
1Department of Future Studies, Institute for Social and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3Ph.D. student of Educational Administration, Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Education, The University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Background: This research aimed to identify the challenges of the regulations for the promotion of faculty members in Iranian universities of medical sciences.
Method: This qualitative research was conducted using the meta-synthesis method and organized in two steps. In the first step, a systematic review method has been used. Based on this, the specialized keywords of the research were searched in international authoritative databases; Science Direct, Springer, Wiley Online Library, PubMed, ERIC, Sage Journals, Emerald, and authoritative national databases; Magiran, Noormags, SID, portals of the Islamic Parliament Research Center, and other national portals, and this search was done during some years (1388-1401) and (2010-2021). In this search, there were 39 studies among which 17 studies were selected based on the PRISMA evaluation form. In the second step, the thematic analysis method of Wolcott (2008) was used.
Results: In the results, three primary subcategories including structural weakness, content weakness, and executive weakness were identified as the challenges of the regulations for the promotion of faculty members. These factors were categorized in the form of eight secondary subcategories, including weakness in design, weakness in supervision, weakness in the educational sector, weakness in the research sector, weakness in the cultural sector, weakness in implementation at the university level, weakness in implementation at the extra-university level, and weakness in the implementation of regulations.
Conclusion: The results of the research can help policymakers and decision-makers in medical sciences universities to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of research and educational achievements by optimizing the policies of the bylaws to promote faculty members.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Challenges of Science Institution؛ Promotion Regulations؛ Promotion Criteria؛ Faculty Development؛ Knowledge Production
مراجع
  1. Trencher G, Yarime M, McCormick KB, Doll CN, Kraines SB. Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Science and Public Policy. 2014;41(2):151-79.
  2. Hadidi HE, Kirby DA. Universities and innovation in a factor-driven economy: the performance of universities in Egypt. Industry and Higher Education. 2016;30(2):140-8.
  3. Compagnucci L, Spigarelli F. The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020; 161:120284.
  4. Hamdan A, Hamdan R. The mediating role of oil returns in the relationship between investment in higher education and economic growth: The evidence from Saudi Arabia. Economics & Sociology. 2020; 13(1):116-31.
  5. Ahmadi S, Tatari F, Hosseini S. A. Human Resources Management models for recruitment of faculty members: A critical review. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, 2016;13(1): 417.
  6. Jamali Zavareh B, Nasr Esfahani A, Nili, M. Analyzing the regulations for the promotion of faculty members: challenges and consequences. Journal of Higher Education, 2018;10 (1):79-98. Persian
  7. Zahour H, Hagdoust A, Dabir Mogaddam M, Shahedi M, Shayesteh M. The requirements of the regulations for the promotion of faculty members in higher health education. Culture and health promotion, 2019; 3(4): 276-288. Persian.
  8. Moradi Moghadam H, Davarpanah M, Diyani M. Investigating the growth pattern of Iran's science after the Islamic revolution: the field of science. Library and information research journal, 2015; 5 (1): 28-49. Persian.
  9. Mosaddegh H, Ghandehari M. Pathology of compiling scientific articles from the perspective of students of major universities in Tehran. Information Management, 2019; 5 (14): 72-99. Persian.
  10. Rezayan Giyebashi A, Mahouzi R. Assessment and evaluation of regulations for the promotion of faculty members of universities and higher education centers. Cultural and Social Studies Research Institute, Tehran: Iran, 2022. Persian.
  11. Azin R. Regulations for promotion and knowledge-based economy. Knowledge-based economy monthly, 2015, 2 (3):32-36 Persian.
  12. Ariannezhad M. Regulations for promotion and challenges of mathematical sciences, Iranian Mathematical Association newsletter, editorial, 2015. Persian.
  13. Assar F, Afifian F.A. Critique on the regulations for the promotion of faculty members of universities and educational institutions of the country: pathology and offering solutions. Book Review Quarterly, 2018, 4 (15). Persian.
  14. Lachal J, Revah-Levy A, Orri M, Moro M.R. Metasynthesis: an original method to synthesize qualitative literature in psychiatry. Frontiers in psychiatry, 2017; 8, 269.
  15. Hazell L, Lawrence H, Friedrich-Nel H. Simulation based learning to facilitate clinical readiness in diagnostic radiography. A meta-synthesis. Radiography. 2020.
  16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2009;151(4), 264–69.
  17. Finfgeld D. L. Metasynthesis: The state of the art—so far. Qualitative health research, 2003;13(7): 893-904.
  18. Ghasemi Y, Hashemi A. Conducting research using thematic analysis method: a practical and step-by-step guide for learning and teaching (case study: music consumption of master's students of Ilam University). Culture of Ilam, 2019, 8(20) :7-37. Persian.
  19. Wolcott HF. Writing up qualitative research. Sage Publications; 2008.
  20. Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative health research, 2016;26(13), 1802-11.
  21. Nasrollahi Nia F, Mahouzi R. Assessment and evaluation of regulations for the promotion of faculty members of universities and higher education centers. Cultural and Social Studies Research Institute, Tehran: Iran. 2022. Persian
  22. Hosseinpour Sh. Identifying and explaining the nature, goals and functions of the higher education system based on the scholarly approach. Journal of Marine Science Education, 2022; 9 (4):1-16 Persian.
  23. Asayesh H, Ghorbani M, Safari R, Borghaei A, Rezapour A. M. Effective factors on educational and research activities of the teachers in Golestan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 2011; (3):294-5. Persian.
  24. Nezhad M.A, Tatari F, Borji A. A comprehensive approach to faculty members’ promotion policies. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research, 2019;| Jul-Sep, 9(3): 115-122. Persian.
  25. Sobhaninejad M, Afshar A. Unblocking the movement of science production and a fundamental solution in the innovation of academic research activities. Management in Islamic University, 2009, 13 (1):5-21. Persian.
  26. Busliki H. Ethical evaluation of the regulations for the promotion of faculty members from the perspective of distributive justice based on merit criteria. Research Journal of Ethics, 2020, 13 (50):7-24. Persian.
  27. Rohani S, Rashidi Z. Analyzing the lived experience of faculty members in the process of promotion of scientific rank: a phenomenological study. Journal of Higher Education, 2018, 10 (1):133-157. Persian.
  28. Asadbeighi M, Yousefi H, Haji Khajelu S. Identifying and explaining the key principles of the regulations for the promotion of faculty members of Iranian universities and research centers. Culture strategy, 2022; 4 (59): 85-131. Persian.
  29. Golmakani E, Nabavi H, Ahmadpour S. Pathology of academic research: the missing link from science to technology. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, 2013; 5 (4): 905-909. Persian.
  30. Safarpour E,Abbaspour J, Salimi Gh. Exploring the Experiences and Views of Shiraz University’s Art and Humanities faculty members on Promotion Regulation. Journal of Knowledge-Research Studies, 2022; 1(1): 29-54. 29-54.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 149
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 149