From Structure to Diagnosis in medical education: An Analysis of Linguistic Features in Iranian Medical Reporting | ||
| Future of Medical Education Journal | ||
| دوره 15، شماره 2، شهریور 2025، صفحه 27-33 اصل مقاله (604.29 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/fmej.2025.86808.1637 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mahboub Amani1؛ Nader Asadi* 2؛ Masoud Zoghi2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. candidate, Department of English language Teaching, Faculty of Humanities, Ahar branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran | ||
| 2Department of English Language Teaching, Faculty of Humanities, Ahar branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Technological progress in medicine necessitates linguistic analysis of diagnostic reports. This study explores the linguistic functions of medical diagnostic reports, by focusing on Radiology Case Reports (RCRs), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) reports, and Computed Tomography-Scan (CT-scan) reports. Method: This descriptive study analyzed a corpus of 300 diagnostic medical reports from Tabriz Medical Science University over a three-month period (Autumn 2024). By employing Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) postulated by Mann and Thompson, this study emphasizes the functional aspects of language by analyzing how linguistic choices fulfill communicative purposes within specific contexts. RST provides a systematic approach to identifying the relationships between different sections of a text, offering insights into how diagnostic reports are organized to convey medical findings clearly and effectively. Results: Diagnostic reports exhibited a predominance of nominal groups (75%), highlighting their critical role in providing detailed identification of anatomical structures. Prepositional groups accounted for 10%, primarily used to offer spatial and procedural context. Verbal groups in passive voice made up 15%, reflecting objectivity and focus on findings and procedures. Complex clauses appeared in 60% of the reports, integrating diagnostic observations concisely. Conciseness was prevalent in 80% of the cases, ensuring that reports were brief yet informative. This highlights a focus on clarity, precision, and efficiency through structured, objective language. Conclusion: These linguistic features serve as important teaching points in medical education for improving students’ competencies in writing and interpreting diagnostic texts that can prepare future healthcare professionals to produce diagnostically effective and professionally appropriate medical documentation. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Functions of Language؛ Medical Imaging Reports؛ Medical Science؛ Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1- Hussain S, Mubeen I, Ullah N, Shah SSUD, Khan BA, Zahoor M, et al. Modern Diagnostic Imaging Technique Applications and Risk Factors in the Medical Field: A Review. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jun 6;2022:5164970. doi: 10.1155/2022/5164970.
2- Alolayyan MN, Alyahya MS, Alalawin AH, Shoukat A, Nusairat FT. Health information technology and hospital performance the role of health information quality in teaching hospitals. Heliyon. 2020 Oct 10;6(10):e05040. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05040.
3- Cranfield S, Hendy J, Reeves B, Hutchings A, Collin S, Fulop N. Investigating healthcare IT innovations: a "conceptual blending" approach. J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(7):1131–48. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2015-0121.
4- Ebrahimi M, Sharifian R, Bahador F, Asadi F, Farmani A, Afrazandeh S. The challenges of picture archiving and communication system from the users’ perspective in the teaching hospitals equipped with the system. Journal of Health and Biomedical Informatics. 2016;3(2):76–84.
5- Olawade DB, David-Olawade AC, Wada OZ, Asaolu AJ, Adereni T, Ling J. Artificial intelligence in healthcare delivery: Prospects and pitfalls. J Med Surg Public Health. 2024 Apr 16:100108. doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100108
6- AlFalah FM, Harrison D, Charissis V, Evans D. An investigation of a healthcare management system with the use of multimodal interaction and 3D simulation. Enterprise Information Management. 2013;26(1/2):183–197. DOI:10.1108/17410391311289622
7- Mansoori B, Erhard KK, Sunshine JL. Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) implementation, integration & benefits in an integrated health system. Acad Radiol. 2012 Feb 1;19(2):229-35. DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2011.11.009
8- Karimian S, Rahimi B. A systematic review of effects of exchanging and sharing medical images systems in a sociotechnical context: evaluation perspectives. Inform Med Unlocked. 2023 Jan 1;38:101212. doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2023.101212
9- Hasani N, Hosseini A, Sheikhtaheri A. Effect of Implementation of Picture Archiving and Communication System on Radiologist Reporting Time and Utilization of Radiology Services: A Case Study in Iran. J Digit Imaging. 2020 Jun;33(3):595-601. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00314-z.
10- European Society of Radiology (ESR. Patient safety in medical imaging: A joint paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS). Radiography. 2019 May 1;25(2):e26-38. doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.01.009
11- Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, Sadowski DC, Fedorak RN, Kroeker KI. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 6;3:17. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y.
12- Almurashi WA. An introduction to Halliday’s systemic functional linguistics. Journal for the study of English Linguistics. 2016 May;4(1):70-80.
13- Mann WC, Thompson SA. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text-interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse. 1988;8(3):243-81. DOI:10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243
14- Peng G. Using Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) to describe the development of coherence in interpreting trainees. InInterpreting Chinese, Interpreting China 2011 May 2 (pp. 107-133). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI:10.1075/intp.11.2.06pen
15- Taboada M, Mann WC. Rhetorical structure theory: Looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Stud. 2006 Jun;8(3):423-59. doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061
16- Chang P, Schleppegrell M. Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. J Engl Acad Purp. 2011 Sep 1;10(3):140-51. DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.005
17- de Mello G, Rafik-Galea S, Heng CS, Arumugam N. Linguistic features in the Introduction section of the Hospitality and Management Research Articles. Malaysian Journal of Languages and Linguistics (MJLL). 2015 Dec 15;4(2):32-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24200/mjll.vol4iss2pp32-51
18- Yu D, Bondi M. A genre-based analysis of forward-looking statements in corporate social responsibility reports. Writ Commun. 2019 Jul;36(3):379-409. /doi.org/10.1177/0741088319841
19- del Saz Rubio MM. A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of Agricultural Sciences. English for Specific Purposes. 2011 Oct 1;30(4):258-71. DOI:10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.002
20- - Garcia LS, Procop GW. Diagnostic medical parasitology. Manual of Commercial Methods in Clinical Microbiology: International Edition. 2016 May 30:284-308.
21- van Melle MA, Zwart DLM, Poldervaart JM, Verkerk OJ, Langelaan M, Van Stel HF, et al. Validity and reliability of a medical record review method identifying transitional patient safety incidents in merged primary and secondary care patients' records. BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 13;8(8):e018576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018576.
22- Rahimi S. Saturation in qualitative research: An evolutionary concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances. 2024 Jun 1;6:100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100174 23- Sheehan J, Laver K, Bhopti A, Rahja M, Usherwood T, Clemson L, et al. Methods and Effectiveness of Communication Between Hospital Allied Health and Primary Care Practitioners: A Systematic Narrative Review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Feb 22;14:493-511. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S295549.
24- Zulkarnain NZ, Meziane F. Ultrasound reports standardisation using rhetorical structure theory and domain ontology. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2019 Jan 1;100:100003. doi.org/10.1016/j.yjbinx.2019.100003
25- Da Cunha I, Iruskieta M. Comparing rhetorical structures in different languages: The influence of translation strategies. Discourse Stud. 2010 Oct;12(5):563-98. DOI:10.1177/1461445610371054
26- Iruskieta M, de Ilarraza AD, Lersundi M. The annotation of the central unit in rhetorical structure trees: A key step in annotating rhetorical relations. InProceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers 2014 Aug (pp. 466-475).
27- Georg G, Hernault H, Cavazza M, Prendinger H, Ishizuka M. From rhetorical structures to document structure: shallow pragmatic analysis for document engineering. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 2009 Sep 16 (pp. 185-192). https://doi.org/10.1145/1600193.1600235
28- Chan HK, Hassali MA, Lim CJ, Saleem F, Ghani NA. Improving pediatric liquid medication labeling of the hospital information system in Malaysia: qualitative analysis of pharmacists' perceptions. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016 Apr-Jun;14(2):699. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.02.699.
29- Coccetta F. Video abstracts in EMP: A corpus-based approach to the analysis of rhetorical structure in multimodal medical genres. Analyzing multimodality in specialized discourse settings: Innovative research methods and applications. 2022 Mar 1:23-44. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 102 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 47 |
||