Evaluation and Comparison of the Effectiveness of an Online Ground Round between Audiology and Occupational Therapy Students of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences During the COVID-19 Pandemic | ||
| Future of Medical Education Journal | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 11، شماره 2، شهریور 2021، صفحه 37-42 اصل مقاله (555.07 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/fmej.2021.54655.1376 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Marzieh Amiri1؛ Dorsa Hamedi* 2؛ Negin Moradi3؛ Fatemeh Taheri1؛ Meimanat Akbari2؛ Arash Bayat1؛ Mohammad Khayatzadeh-Mahani2؛ Mojtaba Tavakoli1؛ Seifolah Jahantabi-Nejad2؛ Nasibeh Noori Mombeyni2؛ Maryam Delphi1؛ Batool Mandani2؛ Sheyda Javadipour2 | ||
| 1Audiology Department, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| 2Occupational Therapy Department, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz,Iran | ||
| 3Speech Therapy Department, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: This study conducted to explore and compare the effectiveness of an online ground round between two groups of audiology and occupational therapy of Ahvaz Jundishpaur University of Medical Sciences (AJUMS) students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The study groups of this analytical cross-sectional study consisted of all fourth-year undergraduate students of audiology and occupational therapy. After implementation of the online grand round, the satisfaction questionnaire and knowledge exam were completed by the students. Results: The level of satisfaction in both groups was above average (average>3); however, there was a significant difference in the mean total score of satisfaction questionnaire between the two groups (P=0.00). The mean score of the knowledge exam was 6.46±1.59 and 6.28±1.89 in the audiology and occupational therapy groups, respectively. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the mean score of this exam between the two groups (P=0.78). Conclusion: The online grand round can play an effective role in transferring the teacher's experiences to students during the COVID-19 pandemic, when it is not possible to hold face-to-face classes. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Ground Round؛ online education؛ satisfaction؛ COVID-19 | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Mollahadi M. Importance of clinical educating in nursery. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2010;2(4):153-9. http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-40-en.html Persian. 2. Rajab MH, Gazal AM, Alkattan K. Challenges to online medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus. 2020;12(7): e8966. https://dx.doi.org/10.7759%2Fcureus.8966 3. Al-Balas M, Al-Balas HI, Jaber HM, Obeidat K, Al-Balas H, Aborajooh EA, et al. Distance learning in clinical medical education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: current situation, challenges, and perspectives. BMC medical education. 2020;20(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02257-4 4. Peisachovich E, Da Silva C, Penhearow NJ, Sombilon EV, Koh M. Implementing Virtual Simulated Person Methodology to Support the Shift to Online Learning: Technical Report. Cureus. 2020;12(6):e8864. https://dx.doi.org/10.7759%2Fcureus.8864 5. Adibi P, Anjevian M. The Clinical Rounds on Patients' Bedside in Internal Ward from Patients' Viewpoints. Iraninan Journal of Medical Education. 2006; 6(1):15-21. http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=183&sid=1&slc_lang=en Persian. 6. Hebert RS, Wright SM. Re-examining the value of medical grand rounds. Academic Medicine. 2003;78(12):1248-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200312000-00013
7. Kassirer J, Kopelman R. Clinical Problem Solving Series Strategies of Information Gathering. Acta Clinica Belgica. 1990;45(4):269-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.1990.11718097 8. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health. 2006;29(5):489-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
9. Bligh J. Identifying the core curriculum: the Liverpool approach. Medical Teacher. 1995;17(4):383-90. . https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/01421599509036774 10. Ferrel MN, Ryan JJ. The impact of COVID-19 on medical education. Cureus. 2020;12(3):e7492. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7492 11. Allen IE, Seaman J. Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States: ERIC; 2013. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED541571 12. Schon F, Cock H, Mistry J. Patients Should be Active Participants In Grand Rounds But Are Students Ready? BMJ Publishing Group Ltd; 2016;87:e1. https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/87/12/e1.174 13. Cole MT, Shelley DJ, Swartz LB. Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2014;15(6):111-31. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1048236.pdf 14. Dziuban C, Moskal P, Thompson J, Kramer L, DeCantis G, Hermsdorfer A. Student Satisfaction with Online Learning: Is It a Psychological Contract? Online Learning. 2015;19(2):n2. https://doi.org/10.24059/OLJ.V19I2.496 15. Okhovati M. Attitude, knowledge and skill of medical students toward e-learning kerman university of medical sciences. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2015;8(1):51-8. http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-705-en.html | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 535 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 259 |
||