Assessing the Educational Environment of Mashhad Nursing and Midwifery School from the Viewpoints of Faculty Members | ||
| Future of Medical Education Journal | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 10، شماره 1، خرداد 2020، صفحه 32-39 اصل مقاله (1.02 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/fmej.2020.41923.1281 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Sajad Mohamadnia1؛ Haji Mohamad Norozi* 2؛ Hamid Heidarian Miri3؛ Shokofeh Masoudi4؛ Zahra Sadat Manzari4 | ||
| 1Msc student, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 4Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: The educational environment has a great impact on learners' success, satisfaction, personal well-being, progress, and their career choices. It is worth noting that inappropriate environments are supposed to be costly and financially negative. Evaluation of the educational environment is the best indicator for achieving high quality educational goals that analyze the educational activities in the academic system, so that it can provide logical and standard results. The purpose of this study was to determine the educational environment of Mashhad School of Nursing and Midwifery from the viewpoints of faculty members and educational professors, as well as to introduce an appropriate questionnaire to evaluate the educational environment from the teachers' point of view. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study. The study population was selected through census which included all teaching professors of Mashhad School of Nursing and Midwifery in year 2019 using demographic information questionnaire and Assessment of Medical Education Environment by Teachers questionnaire. For validity and reliability of questionnares, 50 Questions and six dimensions of teachers' perceptions of education, learning activities, students, learning environment, collaborative environment and self-professionalism were used. Stata software was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics including frequency, mean, and standard deviation were used to describe the collected data. Also, Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used. Results: The mean score of faculty members and teachers' views on the educational environment was 118/59±20/47 out of 200 that devoted the lowest and highest averages, respectively, to the perception of collaborative space and perception of education. Conclusion: The results showed that the faculty members evaluated the educational environment in the faculty more positively. Also using the AMEET questionnaire could be very helpful in the process of identifying the learning environment accurately. Furthermore, examining the educational environment and more careful plannings seem necessary to improve the educational situation. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Educational Environment؛ School of Nursing and Midwifery؛ Educational Management | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Pouratashi M, Zamani A. University and graduates employability: Academics’ views regarding university activities (the case of Iran). Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning. 2019; 9(3): 290-304. Persian.
2. Moosavi H, Makarem A, Bonyadimanehs M. Instructors’ Viewpoints about the Teacher Evaluation System and the Influencing Factors at the Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Journal of Mashhad Dental School. 2016;40(4)371-80..
3. Gashmard R, Moaetamed N, Vahedparast H. Faculty members' and students’ view points on characteristics of a good university teacher in Boushehr University of Medical Sciences. 2011; 11(1): 48-57. Persian.
4. Khomeini R. Sahife-ye Imam. An Anthology of Imam Khomeinis Speeches, Messages, Interviews, Decrees, Religious Permissions, and Letters. Teheran: The Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's…; 2008.
5. Zamani A. Identify, analyze and prioritize effective factors on the quality of education in higher education. lnnovation and value creation. 2019; 11(6): 24-35. Persian.
6. Hajihosseini F, Tafreshi MZ, Hosseini M, Baghestani AR. Teachers’ and postgraduate nursing students’ experience of the educational environment in Iran: A qualitative Research. Electronic physician. 2017; 9(8):5049. Persian.
7. Sanagu A, Jouybari LM, Mehravar F. The perspectives of Golestan University of Medical Sciences students regard to educational climate and university environment. Jentashapir. 2012, 3(2): 303-9. Persian.
8. Vajargah KF, Babadi AK, Hajatmand F. Evaluating internal quality of educational programs of Ph. D medical ethics curriculum from point of professors and students. Medical Ethics Journal. 2014;8(27): 29-52.
9. Jamshidi S, Baghaei F, Abdolsamadi H, Faradmal J, Soltanian A, Ahmadiani E. Evaluation of Academic Staffs’ Viewpoint about Their Assessment by Students in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences(2011–2012). Research in Medical Education. 2013;5(2): 39-45.
10. Ramezani G, Salimi J, Asadi M. The Strategies for Using ICT in Smartization of Schools: A Qualitative Study on a Group of Experts. 2017;8(1):91-111.
11. Torkzadeh J, Mohtaram M. Prediction of Students’Organizational Commitment In The light Of Their Perception Of University’s Educational Climate.2012; 4(2):41-49.
12. Tableman B, Herron A. Best practice briefs: School climate and learning.University-Community Partnerships@ Michigan State University. 2004.
13. Makhdoom NM. Assessment of the quality of educational climate during undergraduate clinical teaching years in the college of medicine, Taibah University. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 2009;4(1): 42-52.
14. Raoufi S, Seikhian A, Ebrahimzade F, Tarahi M, Ahmadi P. Designing a novel sheet to evaluate theoretical teaching quality of faculty members based on viewpoints of stakeholders and charles E. Glassickś scholarship principles. Hormozgan Medical Journal. 2010;14(3): 167-76.
15. Gordon J, Hazlett C, Ten Cate O, Mann K, Kilminster S, Prince K, et al. Strategic planning in medical education: enhancing the learning environment for students in clinical settings. Medical education. 2000;34(10): 841-50.
16. Mohamadi A, Mohamadi J. A Survey Of Lecturers'Opinions About The Learning Environment At Zanjan University Of Medical Sciences. 2014; 7(15): 117-126. Persian.
17. Soltani Arabshahi K, Kouhpayezade J, Sobuti B. The educational environment of main clinical wards in educational hospitals affiliated to Iran university of medical sciences: Learners' viewpoints based on DREEM model. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2008;8(1): 43-50. Persian.
18. Siadat A, Shams B, Gharibi L. Satisfaction of Students and Faculty Members of Graduate Studies From Educational Services Management at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2005;5(2): 93-100. Persian.
19. Heidari Sureshjani N, Naderi N, Rezaei B, Khashmin M. Heidari Sureshjani Assessing the Quality of Educational Services of Postgraduate Studies Based on Servqual Model from the Viewpoints of the Students at Razi University of Kermanshah. Higher Education Letter. 2016;9(35):7-26. Persian.
20. Luke Zadeh Z, Mazloomi SS, Mirzaei M. Solutions quality improvement of medical education. Journal of Medical Education and development. 2013;7(1): 71-4. Persian.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 443 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 312 |
||