Key point sessions, a knowledge sharing method in clinical toxicology education | ||
| Future of Medical Education Journal | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 10، شماره 1، خرداد 2020، صفحه 46-48 اصل مقاله (182.03 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Letter to Editor | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/fmej.2020.43606.1295 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Zahra Ataee؛ Bita Dadpour* | ||
| Medical Toxicology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of medical sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Medical management, is a team work and the nature of clinical toxicology is multidisciplinary. Internal organs problems following intoxications are included in field of internal medicine; similar problems in poisoned children brings pediatric medicine into the arena. The emergency nature of many acute intoxications, the legal problems of poisoned patients, respiratory assist in unconscious cases or need to sedate sever agitation in some intoxicated patients on the contrary, require the expertise of emergency medicine, forensic medicine, and anesthesiology, respectively. Multidisciplinary nature of clinical toxicology is a valuable point; so that, incorporating various medical specialties, gives great power to clinical toxicology groups. On the other hand, this diversity in specialties leads to a variety of viewpoints on dealing with poisoned patients. The key point sessions have been held in Mashhad CTD for the past 18 months and considering the wide range of topics, the need to continue these sessions in the coming years is quietly felt. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Clinical toxicology؛ Multidisciplinary؛ Programmed conferences | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Hámornik BP, Juhász M. Knowledge sharing in medical team: knowledge, knowledge management, and team knowledge. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences. 2010; 18(2):99-107.
2. Tetroe J.M, Graham I.D, Foy R, Robinson N, Eccles M.P., Wensing M, et al. Health research funding agencies’ support and promotion of Knowledge translation: An international study. Milbank Q. 2008;86(1): 125–55.
3. Haughom, J. Innovation in healthcare: Why it’s needed and where it’s going. Health Catalyst. 2014; Retrieved from https://www.healthcatalyst.com/innovation-inhealthcare-why-needed-where-going
4. Mushtaq I, & Rizwan A. Obstacles to knowledge sharing in engineering organizations: A quantitative approach. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies. 2018; 9(3): 293–307.
5. Lam A. Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An Integrated framework. Organization Studies. 2000;21(3): 487–513.
6. Richardson J.E, Abramson E. L, Kaushal R. The value of health Information exchange. J Healthc Leadersh. 2012; 4: 17–23.
7. Chetley A. Improving the health, connecting people: The role of ICTs in the Health sector of developing countries. 2006; Retrieved from http://www.infodev.org/infodev-files/resource/InfodevDocuments_84.pdf
8. Ben Hamouda I, Feki M, Boughala I, Chourabi O. Understanding Knowledge sharing in healthcare system. In Proceedings of the Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS). 2015; AIS Electronic Library.
9. Adeyelure T.S, Kalema B.M, Motlanthe B.L. An empirical Study of knowledge sharing: A case of South African healthcare system. Knowledge Management & E-Learning. 2019; 11(1):114–28. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2019.11.007
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 370 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 228 |
||