Investigating the status of effective components on the evaluation of faculty members of Birjand University of Medical Sciences and its association with the faculties’ demographic characteristics in the academic year 2017-2018 | ||
| Future of Medical Education Journal | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 10، شماره 1، خرداد 2020، صفحه 13-18 اصل مقاله (931.65 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/fmej.2019.40270.1268 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hasan Amirabadizadeh1؛ Afagh Zarei2؛ Yahya Mohammadi* 3، 4 | ||
| 1School of Public Health, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran | ||
| 2PhD student, Department of Medical Education, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Education Development Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran | ||
| 4PhD Student, Allameh Tabatabaei University,Tehran , Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Faculty members are one of the main elements of the university, and their performance plays a critical role in the overall efficiency of the educational system. This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the status of effective components on the evaluation of faculty members of Birjand University of Medical Sciences and its association with the faculties’ demographic characteristics. Methods: This is a descriptive-analytic study. The population comprised all faculty members of Birjand University of Medical Sciences (n = 278) in the academic year 2017-2018. All the members were included using the census method. The faculty evaluation software program was used to collect data. The information from the faculty evaluation form, consisting of 15 components, was extracted and analyzed using the Sama system software. The validity of the form was confirmed by experts, and its reliability was computed using the Cronbach’s alpha method as 0.82. Data analysis was performed using SPSS-18 software, and the significance level was set at p <0.05. Results: Participants in this study were 144 (48%) women and 155 (52%) men. The maximum evaluation score of the faculties was 5, and the mean total evaluation score was 4.49 ± 0.29. There was no significant difference between the average evaluation status of faculty members based on gender and academic degree. However, the evaluation scores were significantly different in terms of academic rank (p <0.001). Conclusion: Directing attention to teaching behavior and performance in the classroom can be an effective strategy to enhance the performance of faculty members. Therefore, it seems necessary to empower faculties (more specifically, lower-level teachers) in terms of effective teaching methods and teacher-student communication skills. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Evaluations؛ Faculty Members؛ Gender؛ Academic Degree؛ Rank | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1- Maroofi Y, Kayamanesh A, Mehr Mohammadi M, Ali Askari M; Evaluation quality of teaching in higher education: A review of some views. Journal of Curriculum Studies 2007;5: 81-112. Persian.
2- Karimi Moonaghi H, Dabbaghi F, Oskouei FK. Learning style in theoretical courses: Nursing students’ perceptions and experiences. Iran J Med Educ. 2009; 9 (1): 41-53. Persian.
3. Segers M, Dochy F. Quality assurance in higher education: Theoretical consideration and empirical evidence. Stud Educ Eval. 1996; 22 (2): 115-37.
4- Ishaqi Fatah, MR, Sadiqi Mandi F. Investigating factors related to execution desirable internal assessment in academic departments (A review of one-hundred experience the past in Iran, the fifth conference "Quality Evaluation in the Academic System" – University Tehran - College of Technical Schools - February. 2011. Persian.
5- Mohammadi Khaghani M, Hosseinzadeh OA. Formation and validation of effective teaching model for professors of Tabriz University. Journal of Educational and Evaluation of Eighth 2015,31(5):77-91. Persian.
6- Mazloomi M, Abad SS, Rahaei Z, Ehrampoush MH, Soltani T. The characteristics of an expert faculty member based on the viewpoints of medical students - Yazd, Iran - 2008. Hormozgan Medical Journal 2010; 14 (3): 226-33. Persian.
7- Sanagoo A, Joibar L. Students’ Viewpoints and Experiences on the Evaluation of Academic Staff in Theoretical Courses. Journal of the Medical Education Development Center of Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2010; 7 (1): 57- 69. Persian.
8- Gillespie M. Student-teacher connection: A place of opportunity. J Adv Nurse 2005; 52 (2): 211-19.
9- Gien-Lant T. Evaluation of faculty teaching efficiency towards accountability in education. Nurs Edu. 1991; 30: 92-95.
10. Saif A. Methods of Measurement and Evaluation of Education. Tehran era publication, 1999. Persian.
11- Shumway JM, Harden RM. Association for Medical Europe. AMEE Guid No. 25: the evaluation of learning outcomes for the competence and reflectire physician. Med Teach. 2003; 25 (6): 56 -84.
12. Fesharakinia A, Khazaei T, Khazaei Z, Mohammadpoor M. Assessment of Birjand Medical School students’ attitudes toward the criteria of academic evaluation in 2009, Modern Care Journal,2012; 9(1): 49-56. Persian.
13- Sproule P. student evaluation of teaching: a methodological critique of conventional practices. 2006. Available at: http: //tre.uedavis/TRC/Ta/TAdevel/seldin.pdf.2006
14- Vakili A, Hajaghajani S, Rashidy-pour A, Ghorbani R. An investigation of factors influencing student evaluation of teacher performance: A comprehensive study in Semnan University of Medical Sciences. Koomesh, Journal of the Semnan University of Medical Sciences, 2011; 12 (2): 93-103. Persian.
15-Turz Zadeh, J, Marzouqi, R, Mohammadi, M, Mohteram, M. Factors Affecting the Evaluation of Teachers from Students’ Perspectives. Educational measurement and evaluation 2014; 4 (7): 139-164. Persian.
16- Shakournia A, Motlagh MA, Malayer A, Jahan mardi A and Kamili Sani H. Student’s Opinion on Factors Affecting Faculty Evaluation in Jondishapoor Medical University. Iranian J Edu Res. 2005; 5:109-17. Persian.
17- Dargahi H, Hamouzadeh P, Sadeghifar J, Raadabadi M, Roshani M, Salimi M et al. Criteria Assessment of a Expect Teacher for Effective Teaching. Payavard. 2011; 4 (3,4) :91-98. Persian.
18-Abedini S, Kamalzadeh H, Abedini P, Aghamolaei T. The Measurements of a Good University Teacher from the Viewpoint of Hormozgan Medical Sciences Students. Medical Journal of Hormozgan 2012;(3): 245-241. Persian.
19-Ghorbani R, Haj Aghajani S, Heidarifar M, Andade F, ShamsAbadi M. Viewpoint of nursing and para medical student about the features of a good university lecture. Journal of Semnan University of Medical Sciences 2009; 10 (2); 77-83. Persian.
20-Jamshidi S, Baghaei F, Abdolsamadi H R, Faradmal J, Soltanian A R, Ahmadiani E. Evaluation of Academic Staffs’ Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (2011-2012). Journal of Research in Medical Education, 2013; 5 (2): 39-45. Persian.
21- Amini M, Honardar M. The view of faculty and medical students about the evaluation of faculty teaching experiences. koomesh journal 2008; 9 (3): 171-178. Persian.
22-Arbooni F, Noorian A, Bakhshoode H. A Survey of Students and Academic Members’ Views about Evaluation Regarding the Quality of Teaching. Journal of Medical Education Development 2010; 3(5): 1-10. Persian. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 500 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 277 |
||