Studying the Knowledge Management Components from Viewpoint of the Faculty Members: A Study at the Dezful University of Medical Sciences in Southwest Iran | ||
| Future of Medical Education Journal | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 9، شماره 3، آذر 2019، صفحه 11-16 اصل مقاله (390.71 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/fmej.2019.37967.1255 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Abdolreza Gilavand1، 2؛ Mohsen Mohammadbidaghi* 1 | ||
| 1Department of Education Development Center, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Education Development Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Production, distribution and application of knowledge are considered as the most institutionalized element and raison d’être of universities and higher education institutions, and the knowledge is recognized as the main output of universities. Therefore, this research examines the components of knowledge management from the point of view of the faculty members of Dezful University of Medical Sciences in southwestern Iran. Methods: This descriptive research was conducted in 2018. The statistical population of this research included all faculty members of Dezful University of Medical Sciences in southwest of Iran. Finally, 43 members of them completed questionnaires. The Knowledge Management Standard Questionnaire (Conrad and Newman) has been used to collect information. Descriptive and inferential statistics as well as SPSS version 22 were used to analyze the data. Results: According to the results of the research, the scores of different components of knowledge management were evaluated to be moderate as follows: knowledge creation (21.5 ± 3.8), knowledge preservation (15.8 ± 3.8), knowledge transfer (11.5 ± 3.3), and knowledge application (12.1 ± 3.5). Also, age, educational level, academic rank and experience had no effect on their knowledge management, but male faculty members had higher knowledge management than female faculty members (P = 0.019). Conclusion: The various components of knowledge management among faculty members were moderate according to our evaluation, which, given the 8-year activity of this university, is relatively "desirable"; it is necessary that this potential of knowledge management | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Knowledge Management؛ Faculty Members؛ Dezful؛ Iran | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Hsu I-Ch. Knowledge sharing practices as a facilitating factor for improving organizational performance through human capital: A preliminary test. Expert Systems with Applications 2008; 35(3): 1316-326.
2. Adineh Qahramani A, Hashempour L, Atapour H. An investigation of status of knowledge management infrastructures in Tabriz University as perceived by its faculty members. Journal of Academic Librarianship and Information Research2011; 45(3): 63-85. Persian.
3. Nikbakht A, Siadat SA, Hoveida R, Moghadam A. Study of the relationship between knowledge management and chairperson's leadership styles at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences from faculty viewpoints. Health Inflamm Manag. 2010;7(2):216-24. Persian.
4. Fullwood R, Rowley J, Delbridge R. Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK Universities. Journal of Knowledge Management 2012;17(1): 123-36.
5. Mehralizadeh Y, Moghadaspour E, Joudzadeh N. Management and strategic planning. Tehran: Rahemoaser; 2013. Persian.
6. Soleimanpour, S. The comparison of infrastructure, the sharing of knowledge from the perspective of faculty members and graduate students martyr Chamran University. Journal of Library and Information Science Studies 2017; 24(19): 21-38. Persian.
7. Mohammadi M, Mehraeen E, Bagheri S, arji G. The study of relationship between total quality management and knowledge management from the perspective of academic staff of Zabol University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Zabol University of Medical Sciences and Health Services 2016; 7 (4):1-10. Persian.
8. Hejazi A, Nazarpoori AH. Study the barriers of successful implementation knowledge management in universities (Case Study; Farhangian University). Managing Education in Organizations 2018; 7(1):169-203. Persian.
9. Gilavand A. Examining the knowledge management status in Iranian Universities: A Review. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2017; 4(11):4219-225.
10. Karimi Moonaghi H, Hasanian ZM, Ahanchian MR. Knowledge management in medical education. J Med Educ Dev. 2014; 7 (16):94-106. Persian.
11. Bahrami S, Yarmohmmadian MH, Ferdosi M, Ojaghi R, Ezadi Varaki FS, Golkar M. The relationship between total quality management and knowledge management from the view of faculty members in University of Isfahan and Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Health Information Management 2012; 9(4):558-66. Persian.
12. Dehghani Soltani M, Mesbahi M, Avami M, Ramezani S. Effect of using new information technologies on psychological empowerment of employees by explaining the role of mediator of knowledge sharing (Case study: Imam Khomeini Naval Academy’s staff). Journal of Research on Management of Teaching in Marine Sciences 2018; 5(1): 41-59. Persian.
13. Gilavand A, Mehralizadeh Y, Hosseinpour M, Torabipour A. A review on pathology of the integration of medical education system with health services at Iran's Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Future Med Educ J. 2018; 8(3):47-56.
14. Mirheydari A, Abedi A, Hoveida R, Siadat SA. Meta-analysis of the impact of organizational culture on the establishment of knowledge management in Iranian organizations. Educational Approaches 2011; 20(16):77-96. Persian.
15. Feyzi T, Ghatrifi L. Relationship between knowledge management and its components with dimensions of learning organization in Islamic Azad University of Science and Research Branch of Tehran. Mission of Government Management 2010; 1(1):155-84. Persian.
16. Nazem F, Karimzadeh S, Ghaderi E. A survey on the relationship between knowledge management, organizational health with personnel entrepreneurship in social security organization of Iran. Soc Res. 2011;3(9):89-115. Persian.
17. Tabibi SJ, Nasiri Pour AA, Aghababa S, Nabipour Jafar Abad N. The study of knowledge management principles in teaching hospitals associated with Iran University of Medical Sciences. Health Inf Manag. 2011;8(4):469-78. Persian.
18. Rajaeepour S, Bahrami S, Kamali DolatAbadi A, Shabani A. The relationship between the applications of knowledge management indices and faculty member’s educational performance in Isfahan University of medical sciences. Health Inf Manag. 2012;4(32):619-24. Persian.
19. Nemati MA, Mohammadi Y, Raeisoon MR. Relationship between knowledge management and educational performance of faculty members. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2015; 8 (4):203-208.
20. Mohammadi Ostani M, Shabani A, Rajaepoor S. The status of knowledge management application in librarians of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2012;12(2):167-75. Persian.
21. Yaghoubi M, Karimi S, Javadi M, Nikbakht A. Correlation study on organization learning and knowledge management in staffs in selected hospitals of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. J Health Administ. 2011;13(42):65-75. Persian.
22. Mirghafoori H, Farhang Nejad M, Sadeghi Arani Z. Evaluating the performance of the health sector in the city of Yazd, applying knowledge management process. J Health Administ. 2010;13(39):79-88. Persian.
23. Madhoshi M, Niyazi E. Evaluation level of knowledge management in selected universities. Transform Manag J. 2011;3(6):116-37. Persian.
24. Keyvanara M, Yazdekhasty A, Bahrami S, Masodian Y. The relationship between components of knowledge management and organizational intelligence in the schools of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Health Inf Manag. 2011;8(5):673-80. Persian.
25. Nemati-Anaraki L, Nooshinfard F. Effective organizational factors in knowledge sharing from the viewpoint of faculty Members. J Health Administ. 2014; 17 (56):65-79. Persian.
26. Songsangyos P. The knowledge management in higher education in Chiang Mai: A comparative review. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2012; 69:399-403.
27. Zhao J, Ordóñez de Pablos P, Zhongying Qi. Enterprise knowledge management model based on china’s practice and case study. Comput Hum Behav. 2012; 28:324-30. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 708 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 462 |
||