Instructional design: missing loop in e-learning educational softwares for medical education | ||
| Future of Medical Education Journal | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 8، شماره 4، اسفند 2018، صفحه 31-38 اصل مقاله (675.95 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/fmej.2018.33822.1217 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Maryam Ghasemi1؛ Hashem Fardanesh* 2؛ Javad Hatami2؛ Soleiman Ahmady3 | ||
| 1PhD candidate, Department of Education, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Education, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Medical Education, faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: E-learning is one of the new ways to learn nowadays which for efficient e-learning in their formulation of electronic content that is usually presented through instructional software we should care. Not using educational design in designing software content is considered one of the main challenges in e-learning and also failures of this educational system. This study aims to investigate the Missing loop of educational design in educational software in e-learning in educational environments for medical education. Methods: Qualitative content analysis method of deductive type is used in this study. The Society of the study is chosen from MA students of e-learning courses in medical education faculty of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for which the purposeful sampling is used and 60 students are selected. The instrument for the study was Semi-structured interview through which the interviews were held with the individuals about the instructional software used in teaching in a purposeful way. The time for each interview ranged from 20 minutes up to 1 hour and all the interviews were lasted for a week. The interviews were held at the level of theoretical saturation until reaching a response. The questions of the interviews for the students were designed based on the standards of electronic learning equipment which included five levels of content, tracking, educational design, and educational and technical media. Results: The results show that the software used in teaching for the students in medical education faculty of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences has the smallest correspondence with the criteria used from the aspect of electronic learning equipment standards and there are lots of problems especially in some aspects of content, tracking and educational design. The existence of such varied problems in medical educational software is arising from problems in technological approach and educational approach such as educational design. This proves the necessity of attention to the principles of instructional design in both preparation and production of such software. Conclusion: This survey suggests that paying attention to the principles of design in the preparation and development of educational software can, as an approach, respond to some of the educational needs and improve the quality and effectiveness of educational training. Developing the educational software based on educational design patterns is one of the basic challenges of e-learning and also it’s the key to success for this educational system. It’s necessary that executing agencies and organizations and universities of e-learning have special attention to educational design and implementation of scientific approaches to put it into practice. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Criteria and standards؛ Educational softwares؛ E-learning؛ Instructional design؛ Medical education؛ Qualitative content analysis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Moradi R, Mohammadi Mehr M, Khazaee F. Design, production and implementation of electronic content (educational multimedia). Course of microbiology of students of AJA University of Medical Sciences based on Ghaeeee's design pattern and its effectiveness. AJA University of Medical Sciences research project; 2015. Persian.
2. Hofmann J. Blended learning instructional design: A modern approach. InSync Trainnig. Available from: https://www.insynctraining.com/pages/Blended_Learning_Instructional_Design A_Modern_Approach.pdf
3. Gibbons AS, Boling E, Smith K. MInstructional design models. 2013.
4. Gibbons AS. An architectural approach to instructional design. New York: Routledge; 2013.
5. Lu L. Digital native preservice teachers: Growing up with technology, not growing up learning with technology. Proceeding of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) Annual Conference, Jacksonville, FL, 2014.
6. Spencer-Oatey H. What is culture? A compilation of quotations. GlobalPAD Core Concepts. [cited 2012]. Available from:
https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/globalpad/openhouse/interculturalskills/global_pad_-_what_is_culture.pdf
7. Taghi Yareh F, Siyadati M. Criteria for choosing content creation tools in e-learning. Quarterly journal of research and planning in higher education 2008; 13(1): 75-92. Persian.
8. Sakiroglu U, Akkan Y. Views of the instructors through dynamic education content design in web environment. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 2009; 1(1): 1012-16.
9. Bull C. Learning theories and instructional design media. Journal of education in multimedia and hypermedia 2005; 77(2): 171-89.
10. Zandi S, Abedi D, Yousefi A, Changiz T, Yamani N, Kabiri M. Introduction to e-learning as a new educational technology and its integration into medical education programs. Iranian journal of medical education 2004; 4(1): 61-70.Persian.
11. Eskandari H. E-learning curriculum standards. Tehran: University Publications; 2010: 66-77. Persian.
12. Amir Teymouri MH. Educational message design. Tehran: Samt; 2012: 33-9. Persian. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,027 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 504 |
||