Total Knee Replacement Sizing: Shoe Size Is a Better Predictor for Implant Size than Body Height | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 6، شماره 2، خرداد 2018، صفحه 100-104 اصل مقاله (363.76 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2017.22499.1603 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Sarah Trainor؛ Jamie Collins؛ Hannah Mulvey؛ Wolfgang Fitz* | ||
| Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA, USA | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Various sizes of implants need to be available during surgery. The purpose of this paper is to compare body height and shoe size with implant sizes in patients who underwent total knee replacement surgery to see which biomarker is a better predictor for preoperative planning to determine implant size. Methods: A total of 100 knees, belonging to 50 females and 50 males, were observed. Participants’ body height and shoe size were collected and correlated to implant sizes of a current, frequently used, standard total knee replacement (TKR) implant. The femoral anteroposterior and mediolateral width and the tibial anteroposterior and mediolateral width were correlated with height and shoe size. Results: The correlation between shoe size and the four knee implant dimensions, femoral AP, ML, and tibial AP and ML were higher than the correlations between height and the same four dimensions. Conclusion: The results indicated that shoe size is a better predictor of component dimensions than is body height. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Biomarkers؛ Implant size؛ Preoperative planning؛ Shoe size؛ Total knee replacement | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Mahoney OM, Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(5):1115-21. 2. Iorio R, Siegel J, Specht LM, Tilzey FJ, Hartman A, Healy WL. A comparison of acetate vs digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: is digital templating accurate and safe? J Arthroplasty.2009; 24(2):175-9. 3. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Abat F, Sarasquete J, Monllau JC. Reliability of preoperative measurement with standardized templating in Total Knee Arthroplasty. World J Orthop. 2013; 4(4):287-90. 4. Miller AG, Purtill JJ. Accuracy of digital templating in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2012; 41(11):510-2. 5. Miller AG, Purtill JJ. Total knee arthroplasty component templating: a predictive model. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(9):1707-9. 6. Levine B, Fabi D, Deirmengian C. Digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2010; 33(11):797. 7. Sawalha S, Pasapula C, Coleman N. An alternative method for predicting size of femoral component of Oxford partial knee replacement. Surgeon. 2012; 10(5):257-9. 8. Williams EJ. The comparison of regression variables. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1959; 21(2):396-9. 9. Weaver B, Wuensch K. SPSS and SAS programs for comparing Pearson correlations and OLS regression coefficients. Behav Res Methods. 2013; 45(3):880-95. 10. Hitt K, Shurman JR 2nd, Greene K, McCarthy J, Moskal J, Hoeman T, Mont MA. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(4):115-22. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 926 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,299 |
||