The Effect of Dynamic Hyperextension Brace on Osteoporosis and Hyperkyphosis Reduction in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 5، شماره 3، مرداد 2017، صفحه 181-185 اصل مقاله (662.7 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2017.20826.1539 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hooman Shariatzadeh؛ Bagher Saeed Modaghegh؛ Alireza Mirzaei* | ||
| Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Osteoporosis and hyperkyphosis could impose a considerable financial and therapeutic burden on the affected society. Thus, new strategies to prevent or manage such complications are of significant importance. Here we evaluate the effect of ‘Dynamic Hyperextension Brace’ (DHB) on bone density, and hyperkyphosis correction. Methods:Sixty postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to the case and control groups and followed for one year. DHB was applied in the case group according to the pre-designed protocol and the patients’ clinical and paraclinical parameters, including bone mineral density (BMD), kyphosis angle, osteoporotic fracture, and serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were evaluated in two groups. Results:Despite no significant difference in basic BMD and kyphosis between the case and control groups, BMD and kyphosis were significantly improved in the DHB treated group, at the end of the study (P=0.003 and P=0.001, respectively). Serum ALP level was significantly higher in cases compared to the controls (P=0.48). The vertebral fracture rate was also lower in the case group compared to the controls. Conclusion:The efficacy of bracing in osteoporosis and kyphosis management should be more emphasized. However, more detailed and controlled studies with more patients and a longer follow-up period is needed to adequately evaluate the long-term results of braces, including DHB. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Dynamic Hyperextension Brace؛ Kyphosis؛ Osteoporosis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Nevitt CS, ODowd KJ. Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Epidemiol Rev. 1985; 7(1):178-208. 2. Kanis JA. Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet. 2002; 359(9321):1929-36. 3. Katzman WB, Wanek L, Shepherd JA, Sellmeyer DE. Age-related hyperkyphosis: its causes, consequences, and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010; 40(6):352-60. 4. Papadakis M, Aggeliki L, Papadopoulos EC, Girardi FP. Common surgical complications in degenerative spinal surgery. World J Orthop. 2013; 4(2):62-6. 5. Nasser R, Yadla S, Maltenfort MG, Harrop JS, Anderson DG, Vaccaro AR, et al. Complications in spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010; 13(2):144-57. 6. Järvinen TL, Sievänen H, Khan KM, Heinonen A, Kannus P. Shifting the focus in fracture prevention from osteoporosis to falls. BMJ. 2008; 336(7636):124-6. 7. Gass M, Dawson-Hughes B. Preventing osteoporosisrelated fractures: an overview. Am J Med. 2006; 119(4):S3-11. 8. Wilkins CH, Birge SJ. Prevention of osteoporotic fractures in the elderly. Am J Med. 2005; 118(11):1190-5. 9. Cortet B. Osteoporosis: from early fracture prevention to better bone health with strontium ranelate. Rheumatology. 2009; 48(Suppl 4):iv14-9. 10. Pisani P, Renna MD, Conversano F, Casciaro E, Di Paola M, Quarta E, et al. Major osteoporotic fragility fractures: risk factor updates and societal impact. World J Orthop. 2016; 7(3):171-81. 11. Wong CC, McGirt MJ. Vertebral compression fractures: a review of current management and multimodal therapy. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013; 6(1):205-14. 12. Pfeifer M, Begerow B, Minne HW. Effects of a new spinal orthosis on posture, trunk strength, and quality of life in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 83(3):177-86. 13. Sinaki M. Exercise for patients with osteoporosis: management of vertebral compression fractures and trunk strengthening for fall prevention. PM R. 2012; 4(11):882-8. 14. Chen JH, Liu C, You L, Simmons CA. Boning up on Wolff’s Law: mechanical regulation of the cells that make and maintain bone. J Biomech. 2010; 43(1):108-18. 15. Karol LA, Virostek D, Felton K, Wheeler L. Effect of compliance counseling on brace use and success in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98(1):9-14. 16. DiRaimondo CV, Green NE. Brace-wear compliance in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988; 8(2):143-6. 17. Reinker KA. Compliance counseling improves outcomes of bracing for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Commentary on an article by Lori A. Karol, MD, et al.: “Effect of Compliance Counseling on Brace Use and Success in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis”. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98(1):e4. 18. Longo UG, Loppini M, Denaro L, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Conservative management of patients with an osteoporotic vertebral fracture A review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(2):152-7. 19. Matussek J, Boluki D, Füssel S, Grifka J. Orthotic methods for osteoporosis and osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Orthopade. 2010; 39(4):387-96. 20. Whyte MP. Hypophosphatasia and the role of alkaline phosphatase in skeletal mineralization. Endocr Rev. 1994; 15(4):439-61. 21. Francis RM, Baillie SP, Chuck AJ, Crook PR, Dunn N, Fordham JN, et al. Acute and long-term management of patients with vertebral fractures. QJM. 2004; 97(2):63-74. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 972 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,330 |
||