Ponseti Casting Method in Idiopathic Congenital Clubfoot and Its Correlation with Radiographic Features Abstract | ||
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
مقاله 7، دوره 5، شماره 3، مرداد 2017، صفحه 168-173 اصل مقاله (972.66 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2017.19515.1508 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Taghi Baghdadi1؛ Nima Bagheri* 1؛ Arvin Najafi2؛ Pejman Mansouri3؛ Mahmoud Farzan1 | ||
1Orthopedic Surgery Ward, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences | ||
2Orthopedic Surgery Ward, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
3Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences | ||
چکیده | ||
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the idiopathic congenital clubfoot deformity treated by Ponseti method to determine the different factors such as radiological investigations that may have relations with the risk of failure and recurrence in mid-term follow-up of the patients. Methods: Since 2006 to 2011, 226 feet from 149 patients with idiopathic congenital clubfoot were treated with weekly castings by Ponseti method. Anteroposterior and lateral foot radiographies were performed at the final follow-up visit and the data from clinical and radiological outcomes were analysed. Results: In our patients, 191(84.9%) feet required percutaneous tenotomy. The successful correction rate was 92% indication no need for further surgical correction. No significant correlation was found between the remained deformity rate and the severity of the deformity and compliance of using the brace (P=0.108 and 0.207 respectively). The remained deformity rate had an inverse association with the beginning age of treatment (P=0.049). No significant correlation was found between the percutaneous tetonomy and passive dorsiflexion range (P=0.356). Conclusion: According to our results treatment with the Ponseti method resulted in poor or no correlation. The diagnosis of clubfoot is a clinical judgment; therefore, the outcome of the treatment must only be clinically evaluated. Although the Ponseti method can retrieve the normal shape of the foot, it fails to treat the bone deformities and eventually leads to remained radiologic deformity. Further studiesare suggested to define a different modification that can address the abnormal angles between the foot and ankle bones to minimize the risk of recurrence. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Club foot؛ Ponseti method؛ radiologic evaluation | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Wynne-Davies R. Family studies and aetiology of club foot. J Med Genet. 1965; 2(4):227-32. 2. Saltzman HM. Foot focus: international initiative to eradicate clubfeet using the Ponseti Method. Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30(5):468-71. 3. Dobbs MB, Morcuende JA, Gurnett CA, Ponseti IV. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot: an historical review. Iowa Orthop J. 2000; 20(1):59-64. 4. Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV. Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980; 62(1):23-31. 5. Ippolito E, Farsetti P, Caterini R, Tudisco C. Longterm comparative results in patients with congenital clubfoot treated with two different protocols. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A(7):1286-94. 6. Herzenberg JE, Radler C, Bor N. Ponseti versus traditional methods of casting for idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002; 22(4):517-21. 7. Morcuende JA. Congenital idiopathic clubfoot: prevention of late deformity and disability by conservative treatment with the Ponseti technique. Pediatr Ann. 2006; 35(2):128-30. 8. Besse JL, Leemrijse T, Themar-Noel C, Tourne Y. Congenital club foot: treatment in childhood, outcome and problems in adulthood. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2006; 92(2):175-92. 9. Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77(10):1477-89. 10. Beyaert C, Haumont T, Paysant J, Lascombes P, Andre JM. The effect of inturning of the foot on knee kinematics and kinetics in children with treated idiopathic clubfoot. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003; 18(7):670-6. 11. Roche C, Mattingly B, Talwalkar V, Tylkowski C, Stevens DB, Hardy PA, et al. Tarsal shape, size, and articulating surface morphology in adolescent surgically treated clubfoot and their contralateral normal foot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006; 26(3):329-35. 12. Farsetti P, De Maio F, Russolillo L, Ippolito E. CT study on the effect of different treatment protocols for clubfoot pathology. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(5):1243-9. 13. Dimeglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet PH, Mazeau PH, Bonnet F. Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995; 4(2):129-36. 14. Vanderwilde R, Staheli LT, Chew DE, Malagon V. Measurements on radiographs of the foot in normal infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988; 70(3):407-15. 15. Spiegel DA, Shrestha OP, Sitoula P, Rajbhandary T, Bijukachhe B, Banskota AK. Ponseti method for untreated idiopathic clubfeet in Nepalese patients from 1 to 6 years of age. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(5):1164-70. 16. Radler C, Mindler GT, Riedl K, Lipkowski C, Kranzl A. Midterm results of the Ponseti method in the treatment of congenital clubfoot. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(9):1827–31. 17. Porecha MM, Parmar DS, Chavda HR. Mid-term results of Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot--(a study of 67 clubfeet with mean five year follow-up). J Orthop Surg Res. 2011; 6(1):3. 18. Jowett CR, Morcuende JA, Ramachandran M. Management of congenital talipesequinovarus using the Ponseti method: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(9):1160–4. 19. Ponseti IV. Treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74(3):448–54. 20. Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics. 2004; 113(2):376–80. 21. Lehman WB, Mohaideen A, Madan S, Scher DM, Van Bosse HJ, Iannacone M, et al. A method for the early evaluation of the Ponseti (Iowa) technique for the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003; 12(2):133–40. 22. Sætersdal C, Fevang JM, Fosse L, Engesæter LB. Good results with the Ponseti method: a multicenter study of 162 clubfeet followed for 2–5 years. Acta Orthop. 2012; 83(3):288–93. 23. Matuszewski L, Gil L, Karski J. Early results of treatment for congenital clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2012; 22(5):403–6. 24. Ostadal M, Chomiak J, Dungl P, Frydrychova M, Burian M. Comparison of the short-term and longterm results of the Ponseti method in the treatment of idiopathic pes equinovarus. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(9):1821-5. 25. Faizan M, Jilani LZ, Abbas M, Zahid M, Asif N. Management of idiopathic clubfoot by Ponseti technique in children presenting after one year of age. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015; 54(5):967-72. 26. Cosma DI, Vasilescu DE. Ponseti treatment for clubfoot in Romania: a 9-year single-centre experience. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2014; 23(6):512-6. 27. Khan SA, Kumar A. Ponseti’s manipulation in neglected clubfoot in children more than 7 years of age: a prospective evaluation of 25 feet with long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2010; 19(5):385-9. 28. Lourenco AF, Morcuende JA. Correction of neglected idiopathic club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(3):378-81. 29. Alves C, Escalda C, Fernandes P, Tavares D, Neves MC. Ponseti method: does age at the beginning of treatment make a difference? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(5):1271-7. 30. O’Halloran CP, Halanski MA, Nemeth BA, Zimmermann CC, Noonan KJ. Can radiographs predict outcome in patients with idiopathic clubfeet treated with the ponseti method? J Pediatr Orthop. 2015; 35(7):734-8. 31. Abulsaad M, Abdelgaber N. Correlation between clinical outcome of surgically treated clubfeet and different radiological parameters. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008; 74(4):489-95. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,096 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,521 |