Responsiveness of Static and Dynamic Postural Balance Measures in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Following Physiotherapy Intervention | ||
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
مقاله 6، دوره 5، شماره 3، مرداد 2017، صفحه 153-167 اصل مقاله (636.11 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2017.18700.1479 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Neda Mostafaee* 1؛ Mohammad J. Shaterzadeh Yazdi1؛ Hossein Negahban2؛ Shahin Goharpey1؛ Mohammad Mehravar1؛ Nahid Pirayeh1 | ||
1Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
2Department of Physical therapy, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Background:The main goal of physiotherapy for patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is to improve postural control and retain knee function. Therefore, clinicians need to use evaluative tools that assess postural changes during physiotherapy. To maximize the clinical utility of the results of these tools, the extracted measures should have appropriate psychometric properties of reliability, validity and responsiveness. No study has yet addressed responsiveness of postural measures in these patients. This study was designed to investigate the responsiveness and determine the minimal clinically important changes (MCIC) of static and dynamic postural measures in patients with (ACL-R) following physiotherapy. Methods: Static and dynamic postural measures were evaluated at first occasion and again after four weeks physiotherapy. The static measures consisted of center of pressure (COP) parameters while dynamic measures included the stability indices. Correlation analysis and ROC curve were applied for assessing the responsiveness. Results:The meanand SD velocity of COP had acceptable responsiveness in both conditions of standing on injured leg with open-eyes and on uninjured leg with closed-eyes, both with nocognitive task. For dynamic measures, stability indices in double-leg standing with closed-eyes with cognitive task condition attained acceptable responsiveness. MCICs for mean and SD velocity in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions were 0.28cm/s, 0.008cm/s, 0.02cm/s, respectively in standing on injured leg with open-eyes; and 0.14cm/s, 0.07cm/s, 0.06cm/s, respectively in uninjured leg with closed-eyes condition. Also, MCICs for anteroposterior, mediolateral and total stability indices were 0.51◦, 0.37◦, 0.34◦, respectively in DCT condition. Conclusion:Our findings provide evidence for selection of appropriate static and dynamic postural measures for assessment of changes in these patients. MCICs for these measures were determined, which provide practical information for clinicians to make decision on clinical significance of changes in patients’ status. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction؛ physiotherapy؛ Postural balance measures؛ Responsiveness | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Bonfim TR, Jansen Paccola CA, Barela JA. Proprioceptive and behavior impairments in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(8):1217-23. 2. Howells BE, Ardern CL, Webster KE. Is postural control restored following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19(7):1168-77. 3. Logerstedt D, Lynch A, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Symmetry restoration and functional recovery before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21(4):859-68. 4. Zouita Ben Moussa A, Zouita S, Dziri C, Ben Salah FZ. Single-leg assessment of postural stability and knee functional outcome two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009; 52(6):475-84. 5. Hinman MR. Factors affecting reliability of the Biodex Balance System: a summary of four studies. J Sport Rrehabil. 2000; 9(3):240-52. 6. Mohammadirad S, Salavati M, Takamjani IE, Akhbari B, Sherafat S, Mazaheri M, et al. Intra and intersession reliability of a postural control protocol in athletes with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a dual-task paradigm. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 7(6):627-36. 7. Salavati M, Hadian MR, Mazaheri M, Negahban H, Ebrahimi I, Talebian S, et al. Test–retest reliabty of center of pressure measures of postural stability during quiet standing in a group with musculoskeletal disorders consisting of low back pain, anterior cruciate ligament injury and functional ankle instability. Gait Posture. 2009; 29(3):460-4. 8. Niknam H, Sarmadi A, Salavati M, Madadi F. Reliability of the center of pressure parameters after ACL reconstruction surgery. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2013; 15(4):43-7. 9. Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL. Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther. 1996; 76(10):1109-23. 10. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000; 53(5):459-68. 11. Negahban H, Mostafaee N, Sohani SM, Hessam M, Tabesh H, Montazeri A. Responsiveness and minimally important differences for selected Persianversion of outcome measures used in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 37(14):1285-90. 12. Strand LI, Anderson B, Lygren H, Skouen JS, Ostelo R, Magnussen LH. Responsiveness to change of 10 physical tests used for patients with back pain. Phys Ther. 2011; 91(3):404-15. 13. de Yébenes Prous MJ, Salvanés FR, Ortells LC. Responsiveness of outcome measures. Reumatol Clin. 2008; 4(6):240-7. 14. Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61(2):102-9. 15. Lehman LA, Velozo CA. Ability to detect change in patient function: responsiveness designs and methods of calculation. J Hand Ther. 2010; 23(4):361-70. 16. Houweling TA. Reporting improvement from patientreported outcome measures: a review. Clin Chiropr. 2010; 13(1):15-22. 17. Negahban H, Ahmadi P, Salehi R, Mehravar M, Goharpey S. Attentional demands of postural control during single leg stance in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Neurosci Lett. 2013; 556(1):118-23. 18. Lafond D, Corriveau H, Hébert R, Prince F. Intrasession reliability of center of pressure measures of postural steadiness in healthy elderly people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(6):896-901. 19. Rafał S, Janusz M, Wiesław O, Robert S. Test-retest reliability of measurements of the center of pressure displacement in quiet standing and during maximal voluntary body leaning among healthy elderly men. J Hum Kinet. 2011; 28(1):15-23. 20. Negahban H, Hadian MR, Salavati M, Mazaheri M, Talebian S, Jafari AH, et al. The effects of dualtasking on postural control in people with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament injury. Gait Posture. 2009; 30(4):477-81. 21. Atilgan OE. Relationships between perceptual-motor skills and postural balance in nine years old boys. Educ Res Rev. 2012; 7(24):517-25. 22. Stratford PW, Riddle DL. Assessing sensitivity to change: choosing the appropriate change coefficient. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005; 3(1):23. 23. Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis. 1986; 39(11):897-906. 24. Ross SE, Guskiewicz KM, Gross MT, Yu B. Balance measures for discriminating between functionally unstable and stable ankles. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 41(2):399-407. 25. Wikstrom EA, Fournier KA, McKeon PO. Postural control differs between those with and without chronic ankle instability. Gait Posture. 2010; 32(1):82-6. 26. Lin WC, Moseley AM, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC. The lower extremity functional scale has good clinimetric properties in people with ankle fracture. Phys Ther. 2009; 89(6):580-8. 27. Moghadam M, Ashayeri H, Salavati M, Sarafzadeh J, Taghipoor KD, Saeedi A, et al. Reliability of center of pressure measures of postural stability in healthy older adults: effects of postural task difficulty and cognitive load. Gait Posture. 2011; 33(4):651-5. 28. Luoto S, Aalto H, Taimela S, Hurri H, Pyykkö I, Alaranta H. One‐footed and externally disturbed two‐footed postural control in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects: a controlled study with follow‐up. Spine. 1998; 23(19):2081-9. 29. Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Fernie GR. Aging and postural control. A comparison of spontaneous- and inducedsway balance tests. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990; 38(1):1-9. 30. Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50(8):869-79. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,738 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,652 |