Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation | ||
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
مقاله 8، دوره 5، شماره 4، مهر 2017، صفحه 243-250 اصل مقاله (575.64 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2017.18100.1465 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Golnaz Ghayyem Hassankhani؛ Ali Moradi* ؛ Ehsan Vahedi؛ Sayyed Hadi Sayyed Hoseinian؛ Zohreh Jahani؛ Maedeh Rahmani؛ Mohammad H. Ebrahimzadeh | ||
Orthopedic Research Center, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Background: The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score is one of the most common clinical instruments used as an outcome measurement tool for distal radius fractures and other upper extremity conditions. The purpose of this study was to translate the PRWE into its Persian version and to evaluate its validity and reliability in patients with upper extremity conditions. Methods: One hundred and fourthly one adult patients with upper extremity conditions participated in this ethical board approved study from August 2015 to May 2016. After translating the original version of the PRWE into Persian, all patients filled out the PRWE in addition to the VAS (Visual analogue scale) and DASH questionnaires. For evaluating reliability, after three days the researchers called back some of the patients who did not receive treatment or any changes in symptoms and asked them to complete the PRWE retest (104 patients). Results: Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as high as 0.934, implying very reliable internal consistency. After each item deletion, the Cronbach’s alpha was still constant (range: 0.926 to 0.936). Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.952 and this showed excellent test-retest reliability. The correlation coefficient between the PRWE and DASH scores was strong. Multivariable analysis showed an association between the PRWE and years educated. Conclusion: Our study has shown that the Persian version of the PRWE is valid and reliable for patients with upper extremity conditions. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Hand surgery؛ Iran؛ Persian؛ PRWE؛ Psychometric Properties؛ Translation؛ Validation؛ Wrist | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Moradi A, Vahedi E, Kachooei AR, Birjandinejad A. Validity and reliability of the persian version of shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (quick-dash).Int J Prev Med. 2015; 8(6):59. 2. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Kachooei AR, Vahedi E, Moradi A, Mashayekhi Z, Hallaj-Moghaddam M, et al. Validity and cross-cultural adaptation of the persian version of the oxford elbow score. Int J Rheumatol. 2014; 2014:381237. 3. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Birjandinejad A, Kachooei AR. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability of the michigan hand outcomes questionnaire among persian population. Hand Surg. 2015; 20(1):25-31. 4. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Shojaei BS, golhasani-Keshtan F, Soltani-Moghaddas SH, Fattahi AS, Mazloumi SM. Quality of life and the related factors in spouses of veterans with chronic spinal cord injury. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013; 11(1):48. 5. MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle M, Roth JH. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma. 1998; 12(8):577-86. 6. MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, Bellamy N, Roth JH. Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patientrated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(2):330-40. 7. Imaeda T, Uchiyama S, Wada T, Okinaga S, Sawaizumi T, Omokawa S, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. J Orthop Sci. 2010; 15(4):509-17. 8. da Silva Rodrigues EK, de Cassia Registro Fonseca M, MacDermid JC. Brazilian version of the patient rated wrist evaluation (prwe-br): cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity. J Hand Ther. 2015; 28(1):69-75. 9. Kachooei AR, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Erfani-Sayyar R, Salehi M, Salimi E, Razi S. Short form-mcgill pain questionnaire-2 (sf-mpq-2): a cross-cultural adaptation and validation study of the persian version in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015; 3(1):45-50. 10. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Vahedi E, Baradaran A, Birjandinejad A, Seyyed-Hoseinian SH, Bagheri F, et al. Psychometric properties of the persian version of the simple shoulder test (sst) questionnaire. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016; 4(4):387-92. 11. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Birjandinejad A, Golhasani F, Moradi A, Vahedi E, Kachooei AR. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability testing of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in the Persian population with shoulder problems. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015; 38(1):84-7. 12. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000; 25(24):3186-91. 13. Walenkamp MM, de Muinck Keizer RJ, Goslings JC, Vos LM, Rosenwasser MP, Schep NW. The minimum clinically important difference of the patient-rated wrist evaluation score for patients with distal radius fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473(10):3235-41. 14. Contributors W. Construct validity Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: URL:https:// en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Construct_ validity&oldid=774377796; 2017. 15. Contributors W. Reliability (statistics) Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. ; . Available at: URL: https:// en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reliability_ (statistics)&oldid=776006196; 2017. 16. Christmann A, Van Aelst S. Robust estimation of Cronbach’s alpha. J Multivar Anal. 2006; 97(7):1660-74. 17. Bravo G, Potvin L. Estimating the reliability of continuous measures with Cronbach’s alpha or the intraclass correlation coefficient: toward the integration of two traditions. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44(4-5):381-90. 18. MacDermid JC, Donner A, Richards RS, Roth JH. Patient versus injury factors as predictors of pain and disability six months after a distal radius fracture. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002; 55(9):849-54. 19. Smith ME, Auchincloss J, Ali M. Causes and consequences of hand injury. the journal of hand surgery: british & european volume. J Hand Surg Br. 1985; 10(3):288-92. 20. Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand clinics. 2012; 28(2):113-25. 21. Mehta SP, MacDermid JC, Richardson J, MacIntyre NJ, Grewal R. A systematic review of the measurement properties of the patient-rated wrist evaluation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015; 45(4):289-98. 22. Moradi A, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Jupiter JB. Intraarticular fractures of the distal radius: bridging external fixation in slight flexion and ulnar deviation along articular surface instead of radial shaft. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2014; 18(1):41-50. 23. Sandelin H, Jalanko T, Huhtala H, Lassila H, Haapala J, Helkamaa T. Translation and validation of the finnish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire (prwe) in patients with acute distal radius fracture. Scand J Surg. 2016; 105(3):204-10. 24. Schonnemann JO, Hansen TB, Soballe K. Translation and validation of the danish version of the patient rated wrist evaluation questionnaire. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013; 47(6):489-92. 25. Kim JK, Kang JS. Evaluation of the Korean version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013; 26(3):238-43. 26. Ozturk O, Sari Z, Ozgul B, Tasyikan L. Validity and reliability of the turkish “patient-rated wrist evaluation” questionnaire. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015; 49(2):120-5. 27. Wilcke MT, Abbaszadegan H, Adolphson PY. Evaluation of a swedish version of the patientrated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009; 43(2):94-101. 28. Hemelaers L, Angst F, Drerup S, Simmen BR, Wood- Dauphinee S. Reliability and validity of the German version of “the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)” as an outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in patients with acute distal radius fractures. J Hand Ther. 2008; 21(4):366-76. 29. Wah JW, Wang MK, Ping CL. Construct validity of the chinese version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire (prwe-hong kong version). J Hand Ther. 2006; 19(1):18-26. 30. Mellstrand Navarro C, Ponzer S, Törnkvist H, Ahrengart L, Bergström G. Measuring outcome after wrist injury: translation and validation of the swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation (prweswe). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12:171. 31. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Pickup ME, Wright V. The visual analogue scale in the assessment of grip strength. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978; 37(4):382-4. 32. Kilinc AS, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Lafosse L. Subacromial internal spacer for rotator cuff tendon repair: “the balloon technique”. Arthroscopy. 2009 Aug;25(8):921-4. 33. Moradi A, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Jupiter JB. Radial Tunnel Syndrome, Diagnostic and Treatment Dilemma. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015 Jul;3(3):156-62. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,633 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,817 |