Adductor Canal Block for Knee Surgeries: An Emerging Analgesic Technique | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 5، شماره 3، مرداد 2017، صفحه 131-132 اصل مقاله (228.11 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: EDITORIAL | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2017.8433 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad R. Rasouli* ؛ Eugene R. Viscusi | ||
| Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In recent years, adductor canal block (ACB) has been introduced as an alternative for femoral nerve block with a great advantage of preserving or minimally reducing quadriceps strength. The technique is relatively easy and is performed under ultrasound guidance. Despite growing evidence regarding efficacy and safety of ACB following knee surgery, use of ACB is still limited to high volume orthopedic centers where trained anesthesiologists in regional anesthesia are available. In this editorial, we aim to briefly review current evidence about ACB. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Adductor canal block؛ Analgesia؛ Knee Surgery | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Jæger P, Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Schrøder HM, Mathiesen O, Henningsen MH, Lund J, et al. Adductor canal block for postoperative pain treatment after revision knee arthroplasty: a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11):e111951. 2. Lund J, Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Sørensen AM, Dahl JB. Continuous adductor-canal-blockade for adjuvant post-operative analgesia after major knee surgery: preliminary results. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011; 55(1):14-9. 3. Jaeger P, Nielsen ZJ, Henningsen MH, Hilsted KL, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2013; 118(2):409-15. 4. Jenstrup MT, Jæger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, et al. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012; 56(3):357-64. 5. Kim DH, Lin Y, Goytizolo EA, Kahn RL, Maalouf DB, Manohar A, et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2014; 120(3):540-50. 6. Kirkpatrick JD, Sites BD, Antonakakis JG. Preliminary experience with a new approach to performing an ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block in the mid to proximal femur. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010; 35(2):222-3. 7. Ludwigson JL, Tillmans SD, Galgon RE, Chambers TA, Heiner JP, Schroeder KM. A comparison of single shot adductor canal block versus femoral nerve catheter for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30(9 Suppl):68-71. 8. Sztain JF, Machi AT, Kormylo NJ, Abramson WB, Madison SJ, Monahan AM, et al. Continuous adductor canal versus continuous femoral nerve blocks: relative effects on discharge readiness following unicompartment knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015; 40(5):559-67. 9. Machi AT, Sztain JF, Kormylo NJ, Madison SJ, Abramson WB, Monahan AM, et al. Discharge readiness after tricompartment knee arthroplasty: adductor canal versus femoral continuous nerve blocks-a dualcenter, randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2015; 123(2):444-56. 10. Jæger P, Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Hilsted KL, Fabritius ML, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block with 10 mL Versus 30 mL local anesthetics and quadriceps strength: a paired, blinded, randomized study in healthy volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015; 40(5):553-8. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,360 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,583 |
||