سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

Hageman, Michiel G.J.S., Döring, Anne Caroline, Spit, Silke A., Guitton, Thierry G., Ring, David, Of Variation group, Science. (1395). Assessment of Decisional Conflict about the Treatment of Trigger Finger, Comparing Patients and Physicians. , 4(4), 353-358. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2016.6319
Michiel G.J.S. Hageman; Anne Caroline Döring; Silke A. Spit; Thierry G. Guitton; David Ring; Science Of Variation group. "Assessment of Decisional Conflict about the Treatment of Trigger Finger, Comparing Patients and Physicians". , 4, 4, 1395, 353-358. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2016.6319
Hageman, Michiel G.J.S., Döring, Anne Caroline, Spit, Silke A., Guitton, Thierry G., Ring, David, Of Variation group, Science. (1395). 'Assessment of Decisional Conflict about the Treatment of Trigger Finger, Comparing Patients and Physicians', , 4(4), pp. 353-358. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2016.6319
Hageman, Michiel G.J.S., Döring, Anne Caroline, Spit, Silke A., Guitton, Thierry G., Ring, David, Of Variation group, Science. Assessment of Decisional Conflict about the Treatment of Trigger Finger, Comparing Patients and Physicians. , 1395; 4(4): 353-358. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2016.6319

Assessment of Decisional Conflict about the Treatment of Trigger Finger, Comparing Patients and Physicians

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
مقاله 12، دوره 4، شماره 4، دی 2016، صفحه 353-358    اصل مقاله (380 K)
نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2016.6319
نویسندگان
Michiel G.J.S. Hageman1؛ Anne Caroline Döring1؛ Silke A. Spit1؛ Thierry G. Guitton1؛ David Ring* 2؛ Science Of Variation group1
1Yawkey Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
2Chief Orthopaedic Hand Service, Yawkey Center, Suite 2100, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, USA
چکیده
 
Background:
As an early step in the development of a decision aid for idiopathic trigger finger (TF) we were interested in the level of decisional conflict experienced by patients and hand surgeons. This study tested the null hypothesis that there is no difference in decisional conflict between patients with one or more idiopathic trigger fingers and hand surgeons. Secondary analyses address the differences between patients and surgeons regarding the influence of the DCS-subcategories on the level of decisional conflict, as well as the influence of patient and physician demographics, the level of self-efficacy, and satisfaction with care on decisional conflict.
 
Methods:
One hundred and five hand surgeon-members of the Science of Variation Group (SOVG) and 84 patients with idiopathic TF completed the survey regarding the Decisional Conflict Scale. Patients also filled out the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and the Patient Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9).
Results:
On average, patients had decisional conflict comparable to physicians, but by specific category patients felt less informed and supported than physicians. The only factors associated with greater decisional conflict was the relationship between the patient and doctor.
Conclusions:
There is a low, but measurable level of decisional conflict among patients and surgeons regarding idiopathic trigger finger. Studies testing the ability of decision aids to reduce decisional conflict and improve patient empowerment and satisfaction with care are merited.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Assessment of Needs؛ Decisional Conflict Scale؛ Shared decision making؛ Trigger Finger
مراجع
1. Shaw D, Elger B. Evidence-based persuasion: an
ethical imperative. JAMA. 2013; 309(16):1689-90.
2. Wennberg JE, Mulley AG Jr, Hanley D, Timothy
RP, Fowler FJ Jr, Roos NP, et al. An assessment of
prostatectomy for benign urinary tract obstruction.
Geographic variations and the evaluation of medical
care outcomes. JAMA. 1988; 259(20):3027-30.
3. Vranceanu AM, Cooper C, Ring D. Integrating patient
values into evidence-based practice: effective
communication for shared decision-making. Hand
Clin. 2009; 25(1):83-96.
4. Clark JP, Hudak PL, Hawker GA, Coyte PC, Mahomed
NN, Kreder HJ, et al. The moving target: a qualitative
study of elderly patients’ decision-making regarding
total joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
2004; 86-A(7):1366-74.
5. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB,
Holmes-Rovner M, et al. Decision aids for people facing
health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2011; 10(10):CD001431.
6. Legare F, O’Connor AM, Graham ID, Wells GA,
Tremblay S. Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support
Framework on the agreement and the difference
between patients’ and physicians’ decisional conflict.
Med Decis Making. 2006; 26(4):373-90.
7. Goel V, Sawka CA, Thiel EC, Gort EH, O’Connor AM.
Randomized trial of a patient decision aid for choice
of surgical treatment for breast cancer. Med Decis
Making. 2001; 21(1):1-6.
8. Knops AM, Goossens A, Ubbink DT, Legemate
DA, Stalpers LJ, Bossuyt PM. Interpreting patient
decisional conflict scores: behavior and emotions in
decisions about treatment. Med Decis Making. 2013;
33(1):78-84.
9. Elwyn G, O’Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A,
Coulter A, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework
for patient decision aids: online international Delphi
consensus process. BMJ. 2006; 333(7565):417.
10. Koedoot N, Molenaar S, Oosterveld P, Bakker P, de
Graeff A, Nooy M, et al. The decisional conflict scale:
further validation in two samples of Dutch oncology
patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2001; 45(3):187-93.
11. O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale.
Med Decis Making. 1995; 15(1):25-30.
12. O’Connor AM. User manual-Decisional conflict scale.
Available at: URL: http://decisionaidohrica/docs/
develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decisional_Conflictpdf;
2010.
13. Asghari A, Nicholas MK. Pain self-efficacy beliefs
and pain behaviour. A prospective study. Pain. 2001;
94(1):85-100.
14. Nicholas MK. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire:
Taking pain into account. Eur J Pain. 2007; 11(2):153-
63.
15. Van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Van Oppen P, Van Marwijk
HW, De Beurs E, Van Dyck R. A patient-doctor
relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in primary
care: development and psychometric evaluation. Gen
Hosp Psychiatry. 2004; 26(2):115-20.
16. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez
N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture
(REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and
workflow process for providing translational
research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;
42(2):377-81.
17. Obeid JS, McGraw CA, Minor BL, Conde JG, Pawluk R,
Lin M, et al. Procurement of shared data instruments
for Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). J
Biomed Inform. 2013; 46(2):259-65.
18. Goh AC, Kowalkowski MA, Bailey DE Jr, Kazer MW,
Knight SJ, Latini DM. Perception of cancer and
inconsistency in medical information are associated
with decisional conflict: a pilot study of men with
prostate cancer who undergo active surveillance.
BJU Int. 2012; 110(2 Pt 2):E50-6.
19. van Randenborgh A, de Jong-Meyer R, Huffmeier
J. Decision making in depression: differences in
decisional conflict between healthy and depressed
individuals. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010;
17(4):285-98.
20. Salkovskis PM, Rimes KA, Warwick HM, Clark DM.
The Health Anxiety Inventory: development and
validation of scales for the measurement of health
anxiety and hypochondriasis. Psychol Med. 2002;
32(5):843-53.
21. Vranceanu AM, Safren S, Zhao M, Cowan J, Ring D.
Disability and psychologic distress in patients with
nonspecific and specific arm pain. Clin Orthop Relat
Res. 2008; 466(11):2820-6.
22. Vranceanu AM, Jupiter JB, Mudgal CS, Ring D.
Predictors of pain intensity and disability after minor
hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2010; 35(6):956-60.
23. Vranceanu AM, Barsky A, Ring D. Psychosocial
aspects of disabling musculoskeletal pain. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(8):2014-8.
24. Gruber JS, Hageman M, Neuhaus V, Mudgal CS, Jupiter
JB, Ring D. Patient activation and disability in upper
extremity illness. J Hand Surg. 2014; 39(7):1378-83

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,188
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,041