1. Baskett TF, Nagele F. Naegele's rule: a reappraisal. BJOG 2000 Nov; 107(11):1433­5.

2. Mittendorf R, Williams MA, Berkey CS, Cotter PF. The length of uncomplicated human gestation. Obstet

Gynecol 1990 Jun; 75(6):929­32.

3. Barr WB, Pecci CC. Last menstrual period versus ultrasound for pregnancy dating. Int J Gynecol Obstet

2004 Oct;87(1):38­9.

4. Nichols  C. Dating pregnancy. Gathering and using a reliable data base. J  Nurse Midwifery 1987 Jul­ Aug;32(4):195­204.

5. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Gilstrap III L, Wenstrom KD. Williams obstetrics. 22nd ed. Newyork: McGraw­Hill;2005:61,244­5 .

6. Guyton A C, Hall JE. Textbook of medical physiology. 11th ed. Philadelphia:Elsevier Saunders; 2006:1026.

7. Parikh RM. Parikh’s formula to minimize errors in calculating expected date of delivery. Med Hypotheses 2007; 68(4): 928.

8. Olsen  O , Clausen JA. [ Determination of the expected day of delivery­­ultrasound has not been shown to  be  more  accurate  than  the  calendar method]. [Article  in  German]. Ugeskr Laeger 1998  Mar 30;160(14):2088­90.

9. Olsen  O. Expected day of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999 Sep;106(9):1000 .

10. Lynch CD, Zhang J. The research implications  of the selection of a  gestational age  estimation method.

Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;21 Suppl 2:86­96.

11. Firoozabadi R , Botorabi T , Tayebi N. [Determination  of accuracy of ultrasound  and  Naegele’s rule in  predicting of delivery date]. [Article in Persian]. Rafsanjan Med Sci Univ J 2007;6:163­70.

12. Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2001 Feb;97(2):189­94.

13. Saunders N, Paterson C. Can we abandon Naegele's rule?. Lancet 1991 Mar 9;337(8741):600­1.

14. Katz VL, Farmer R, Tufariello J, Carpenter M. Why we should eliminate the due date: a truth in jest. Obstet Gynecol 2001 Dec;98(6):1127­9.

15. Shagufta SS , Rana S. Critical evaluation of naegele’s rule and the  concept of term. FIGO World Congr Gynecol Obstet 2006 Nov;137.

16. Nguyen T, Larsen T, Engholm G, Møller H. Evaluation of ultrasound­estimated date of delivery in 17,450 

spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele’s rule?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999 

Jul;14 (1): 23­8.