The role of surface charge of ISCOMATRIX nanoparticles on the type of immune response generated against Leishmaniasis in BALB/c mice | ||
| Nanomedicine Journal | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 2، شماره 4، دی 2015، صفحه 249-260 اصل مقاله (460.47 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.7508/nmj.2015.04.002 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ahmad Mehravaran1؛ Mahmoud Reza Jaafari2؛ Seyed Amir Jalali3؛ Ali Khamesipour4؛ Mohsen Tafaghodi1؛ Mansure Hojatizade1؛ Ali Badiee* 1 | ||
| 1Nanotechnology Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 2Biotechnology Research Center, Nanotechnology Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 3Immunology Department, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 4Center for Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Objective(s): ISCOMATRIX vaccines have now been shown to induce strong antigen-specific cellular or humoral immune responses to a broad range of antigens of viral, bacterial, parasite or tumor. In the present study, we investigated the role of ISCOMATRIX charge in induction of a Th1 type of immune response and protection against Leishmania major infection in BALB/c mice. Materials and Methods: Positively and negatively charged ISCOMATRIX were prepared. BALB/C mice were immunized subcutaneously, three times with 2-week intervals, with different ISCOMATRIX formulations. Soluble Leishmania antigens (SLA) were mixed with ISCOMATRIX right before injection. The extent of protection and type of immune response were studied in different groups of mice. Results: The group of mice immunized with negatively charged ISCOMATRIX showed smaller footpad swelling upon challenge with L. major and the highest IgG2a production compared with positively charged one. The mice immunized with positively charged ISCOMATRIX showed the lowest splenic parasite burden compared to the other groups. Cytokine assay results indicated that the highest level of IFN- γ and IL-4 secretion was observed in the splenocytes of mice immunized with negatively charged ISCOMATRIX as compared to other groups. Conclusion: The results indicated that ISCOMATRIX formulations generate an immune response with mixed Th1/Th2 response that was not protective against challenge against L. major. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ISCOMATRIX؛ Immune response؛ Leishmania major؛ Surface Charge | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. O'Hagan DT, Singh M, Ulmer JB. Microparticle-based technologies for vaccines. Methods. 2006; 40(1): 10–19.
2. Sacks D, Noben-Trauth N. The immunology of susceptibility and resistance to leishmania major in mice. Nat.Rev.Immunol 2002; 2: 845-858.
3. Allison AG, Gregoriadis G. Liposomes as immunological adjuvants. Nature. 1974; 252(5480): 252.
4. Davis D, Davies A, Gregoriadis G. Liposomes as adjuvants with immunopurified tetanus toxoid: the immune response. Immunol Lett. 1987; 14(4): 341–348.
5. Alving CR. Liposomes as carriers of antigens and adjuvants. J Immunol Methods. 1991; 140(1): 1–13.
6. Jaafari MR, Ghafarian A, Farrokh-Gisour A, Samiei A, Kheiri MT, Mahboudi F, et al. Immune response and protection assay of recombinant major surface glycoprotein of Leishmania (rgp63) reconstituted with liposomes in BALB/c mice. Vaccine 2006; 24(29–30): 5708–5717.
7. Galdiero F, Carratelli CR, Nuzzo I, Bentivoglio C, De Martino L, Gorga F, et al. Beneficial effects of myristic, stearic or oleic acid as part of liposomes on experimental infection and antitumor effect in a murine model. Life Sci 1994; 55(7): 499–509.
8. Aramaki Y, Suda H, Tsuchiya S. Interferon-gamma inductive effect of liposomes as an Immunoadjuvant. Vaccine 1995; 13(18): 1809–1814.
9. Yotsumoto S, Aramaki Y, Kakiuchi T, Tsuchiya S. Induction of antigen-dependent interleukin-12 production by negatively charged liposomes encapsulating antigens. Vaccine 2004; 22(25–26): 3503–3509.
10. Yotsumoto S, Kakiuchi T, Aramaki Y. Enhancement of IFN-gamma production for Th1-cell therapy using negatively charged liposomes containing phosphatidylserine. Vaccine 2007; 25(29): 5256–5262.
11. Walker C, Selby M, Erickson A, Cataldo D, Valensi JP, Van Nest GV. Cationic lipids direct a viral glycoprotein into the class I major histocompatibility complex antigen-presentation pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89(17): 7915–7918.
12. Copland MJ, Rades T, Davies NM, Baird MA. Lipid based particulate formulations for the delivery of antigen. Immunology and Cell Biology 2005; 83: 97–105.
13. Afrin F, Ali N. Adjuvanticity and protective immunity elicited by Leishmania donovani antigens encapsulated in positively charged liposomes. Infect Immun 1997; 65(6): 2371–2377.
14. Guy B, Pascal N, Francon A, Bonnin A, Gimenez S, Lafay-Vialon E, et al. characterization and preclinical efficacy of a cationic lipid adjuvant for influenza split vaccine. Vaccine 2001; 19(13–14): 1794–1805.
15. Yan W, Huang L. The effects of salt on the physicochemical properties and immunogenicity of protein based vaccine formulated in cationic liposome. Int J Pharm 2009; 368(1–2): 56–62.
16. Nakanishi T, Kunisawa J, Hayashi A, Tsutsumi Y, Kubo K, Nakagawa S, et al. Positively charged liposome functions as an efficient immunoadjuvant in inducing cell-mediated immune response to soluble proteins. J Control Release 1999; 61(1–2): 233–240.
17. Afrin F, Rajesh R, Anam K, Gopinath M, Pal S, Ali N. Characterization of Leishmania donovani antigens encapsulated in liposomes that induce protective immunity in BALB/c mice. Infect Immun 2002; 70(12): 6697–6706.
18. Badiee A, Jaafari MR, Khamesipour A, Samiei A, Soroush D, Kheiri MT, et al. The role of liposome charge on immune response generated in BALB/c mice immunized with recombinant major surface glycoprotein of Leishmania (rgp63). Exp Parasitol 2009; 121(4): 362–369.
19. Word Health Organization (WHO). Control of the Leishmaniases, Report of a Meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on the Control of Leishmaniases. WHO Technical report Series 949, Geneva 2010; pp. 1-187.
20. Modabber F. Vaccines against leishmaniasis. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1995;89 (Suppl. 1): 83–88.
21. Khamesipour A, Dowlati Y, Asilian A, Hashemi-Fesharki R, Javadi A, Noazin S,et al. Leishmanization: use of an old method for evaluation of candidate vaccines against leishmaniasis. Vaccine 2005; 23: 3642–3648.
22. Heinzel FP, Sadick MD, Mutha SS, Locksley RM. Production of interferon gamma, interleukin 2, interleukin 4, and interleukin 10 by CD4+ lymphocytes in vivo during healing and progressive murine leishmaniasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88(16): 7011-5.
23. Copland MJ, Rades T, Davies NM, Baird MA. Lipid based particulate formulations for the delivery of antigen. Immunology and Cell Biology 2005; 83: 97–105.
24. Badiee A, Heravi Shargh V, Khamesipour A, Jaafari MR. Micro/nanoparticle adjuvants for antileishmanial vaccines: present and future trends. Vaccine 2013; 31(5): 735-49.
25. Lovgren K, Morein B. The requirement of lipids for the formation of immunostimulating complexes (ISCOMs). Biotechnol Appl Biochem 1988; 10(2):161–72.
26. Morein B, Sundquist B, Höglund S, Dalsgaard K, Osterhaus A. Iscom, a novel structure for antigenic presentation of membrane proteins from enveloped viruses. Nature 1984; 308: 457– 460.
27. Drane D, Gittleson C, Boyle J, Maraskovsky E. ISCOMATRIX adjuvant for prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines 2007; 6(5): 761–72.
28. Pearse MJ, Drane D. ISCOMATRIX® adjuvant for antigen delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005; 57(3): 465–74.
29. Morein B, Hu K, Abusugra I. Current status and potential application of ISCOMs in veterinary medicine. Advanced drug delivery reviews 2004; 56(10): 1367.1382.
30. Skene C, Sutton P. Saponin-adjuvanted particulate vaccines for clinical use. Methods 2006;40(1): 53-9.
31. Khamesipour A, Rafati S, Davoudi N, Maboudi F, Modabber F. Leishmaniasis vaccine candidates for development: a global overview. Indian Journal of Medical Research 2006;123: 423–438.
32. Noazin S, Modabber F, Khamesipour A, Smith PG, Moulton LH, Nasseri K,et al. First generation leishmaniasis vaccines: a review of field efficacy trials. Vaccine 2008;26(52): 6759-67.
33. Scott P, Pearce E, Natovitz P, Sher A. Vaccination against cutaneous leishmaniasis in a murine model. I. Induction of protective immunity with a soluble extract of promastigotes. J Immunol. 1987; 139(1): 221-7.
34. Bainor A, Chang L, McQuade TJ, Webb B, Gestwicki JE. Bicinchoninicacid
(BCA) assay in low volume. Analytical Biochemistry 2010; 410: 310–402.
35. Liang MT, Toth I, Davies NM. A novel method for preparing immune stimulating complexes (ISCOMs) by hydration of freeze-dried lipid matrix.European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2008;68: 840–845.
36. Jaafari MR, Ghafarian A, Farrokh-Gisour A, Samiei A, Kheiri MT, Mahboudi F, et al. Immune response and protection assay of recombinant major surface glycoprotein of leishmania (rgp63) reconstituted with liposomes in BALB/c mice. Vaccine 2006;24: 5708–5717.
37. Titus RG, Marchand M, Boon T, Louis JA. A limiting dilution assay for quantifying Leishmania major in tissues of infected mice. Parasite Immunology 1985;7: 545–555.
38. Badiee A, Jaafari MR, Khamesipour A. Leishmania major: immune response in BALB/c mice immunized with stress-inducible protein 1 encapsulated in liposomes. Experimental Parasitology 2007; 115: 127–134.
39. Taswell C. Limiting dilution assays for the determination of immuno competent cell frequencies. 1. Data analysis. Journal of Immunology 1981;126: 1614–1619.
40. Jaafari MR, Badiee A, Khamesipour A, Samiei A, Soroush D, Kheiri MT, et al. The role of CpG ODN in enhancement of immune response and protection in BALB/c mice immunized with recombinant major surface glycoprotein of Leishmania (rgp63) encapsulated in cationic liposome. Vaccine 2007;25: 6107–6117.
41. Hejazi H, Tasbihi M, Jaafari M, Badiee A, Pestechian N, Javadi A, et al. The role of liposomal CpG ODN on the course of L. major infection in BALB/C mice. Iranian journal of parasitology 2010;5(1): 47-54.
42. Bhowmick S, Ravindran R, Ali N. Leishmanial antigens in liposomes promote protective immunity and provide immunotherapy against visceral leishmaniasis via polarized Th1 response. Vaccine 2007;25(35): 6544.56.
43. Thiele L, Merkle HP, Walter E. Phagocytosis and phagosomal fate of Surface-modified microparticles in dendritic cells and macrophages. Pharmaceutical Research 2003; 20: 221–228.
44. Foged C, Brodin B, Frokjaer S, Sundblad A. Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology Particle size and surface charge affect particle uptake by human dendritic cells in an in vitro model. Int J Pharm 2005; 298(2): 315-22.
45. Kuwana M, Matsuura E, Kobayashi K, Okazaki Y, Kaburaki J, Ikeda Y, et al. Binding of beta 2-glycoprotein I to anionic phospholipids facilitates processing and presentation of a cryptic epitope that activates pathogenic autoreactive T cells. Blood 2005; 105(4): 1552-7.
46. Jiao X, Wang RY, Feng Z, Alter HJ, Shih JW. Modulation of cellular immune response against hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 3 by cationic liposome encapsulated DNA immunization. Hepatology 2003; 37(2): 452-60.
47. Foged C, Arigita C, Sundblad A, Jiskoot W, Storm G, Frokjaer S. Interaction of dendritic cells with antigen-containing liposomes: effect of bilayer composition. Vaccine 2004; 22: 1903–1913.
48. Schnurr M, Orban M, Robson NC, Shin A, Braley H, Airey D, et al. ISCOMATRIX adjuvant induces efficient cross-presentation of tumor antigen by dendritic cells via rapid cytosolic antigen delivery and processing via tripeptidyl peptidase II. J Immunol 2009; 182: 1253–1259.
49. Schnurr M, Chen Q, Shin A, Chen W, Toy T, Jenderek C, et al. Tumor antigen processing and presentation depend critically on dendritic cell type and the mode of antigen delivery. Blood 2005; 105: 2465–2472.
50. Heath WR, Belz GT, Behrens GM, Smith CM, Forehan SP, Parish IA, et al. Cross presentation, dendritic cell subsets, and the generation of immunity to cellular antigens. Immunol Rev 2004; 199: 9–26.
51. Sjölander A, Drane D, Maraskovsky E, Scheerlinck JP, Suhrbier A, Tennent J, et al. Immune responses to ISCOM formulations in animal and primate models. Vaccine 2001; 19: 2661–2665.
52. Le TT, Drane D, Malliaros J, Cox JC, Rothel L, Pearse M, et al. Cytotoxic T cell polyepitope vaccines delivered by ISCOMs. Vaccine 2001; 19: 4669–4675.
53. Polakos NK, Drane D, Cox J, Ng P, Selby MJ, Chien D, et al. Characterization of hepatitis C virus core-specific immune responses primed in rhesus macaques by a nonclassical ISCOM vaccine. J Immunol 2001; 166: 3589–3598.
54. Maraskovsky E, Schnurr M, Wilson NS, Robson NC, Boyle J, Drane D. Development of prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines using the ISCOMATRIX adjuvant. Immunology and Cell Biology 2009; 87(5): 371-6.
55. Boyle J, Eastman D, Millar C, Camuglia S, Cox J, Pearse M, et al. The utility of ISCOMATRIX adjuvant for dose reduction of antigen for vaccines requiring antibody responses. Vaccine 2007; 25: 2541–2544.
56. Drane D, Maraskovsky E, Gibson R, Mitchell S, Barnden M, Moskwa A, et al. Priming of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses using a HCV core ISCOMATRIX™ vaccine: A phase I study in healthy volunteers. Human Vaccines 2009; 5(3): 151-7.
57. Kensil CR, Patel U, Lennick M, Marciani D. Separation and characterization of saponins with adjuvant activity from Quillaja saponaria Molina cortex. J Immunol 1991; 146(2): 431–7.
58. Liu G, Anderson C, Scaltreto H, Barbon J, Kensil CR. QS-21 structure/function studies: effect of acylation on adjuvant activity. Vaccine 2002; 20(21-22): 2808-15.
59. Waite DC, Jacobson EW, Ennis FA, Edelman R, White B, Kammer R, et al. Three double-blind, randomized trials evaluating the safety and tolerance of different formulations of the saponin adjuvant QS-21. Vaccine 2001; 19(28-29): 3957-67. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,700 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,974 |
||