سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

Momenzadeh, Omid, Gerami, Mohamad, Sefidbakht, Sepideh, Dehghani, Sakineh. (1394). Assessment of Correlation Between MRI and Arthroscopic Pathologic Findings in the Shoulder Joint. , 3(4), 286-290. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2015.4505
Omid Momenzadeh; Mohamad Gerami; Sepideh Sefidbakht; Sakineh Dehghani. "Assessment of Correlation Between MRI and Arthroscopic Pathologic Findings in the Shoulder Joint". , 3, 4, 1394, 286-290. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2015.4505
Momenzadeh, Omid, Gerami, Mohamad, Sefidbakht, Sepideh, Dehghani, Sakineh. (1394). 'Assessment of Correlation Between MRI and Arthroscopic Pathologic Findings in the Shoulder Joint', , 3(4), pp. 286-290. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2015.4505
Momenzadeh, Omid, Gerami, Mohamad, Sefidbakht, Sepideh, Dehghani, Sakineh. Assessment of Correlation Between MRI and Arthroscopic Pathologic Findings in the Shoulder Joint. , 1394; 3(4): 286-290. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2015.4505

Assessment of Correlation Between MRI and Arthroscopic Pathologic Findings in the Shoulder Joint

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
مقاله 12، دوره 3، شماره 4، دی 2015، صفحه 286-290    اصل مقاله (330.04 K)
نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2015.4505
نویسندگان
Omid Momenzadeh؛ Mohamad Gerami* ؛ Sepideh Sefidbakht؛ Sakineh Dehghani
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Chamran Hospital, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده
 
Background: The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging for shoulder joint pathologies and then compare the results with arthroscopy, the standard for joint diagnosis.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 80 patients with shoulder joint disorders, who underwent final arthroscopy, were studied. Based on patients’ medical history and physical examinations, shoulder MRI was requested if paraclinical investigations were. If non-surgical therapies failed, arthroscopy of the affected shoulder was done and the same structures were inspected. Subsequently, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV) and (NPV) of MRI were determined by arthroscopy comparisons.
Results: The highest sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were found in MRI pathology reports that included: Hill-Sach lesion (0.910), infraspinatus tendon (0.985), supraspinatus tendon (0.930), and biceps tendon (0.954), respectively. Rotator interval (0.250), biceps labrum complex (0.805), subscapularis tendon (0.538) and anterior labrum lesions (0.604) had the lowest sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV, respectively.
Conclusion: The results showed that MRI can be a useful tool in ruling out possible abnormalities in the shoulder and to give clues to the most probable diagnosis. Although knowing some practical skills in order to successfully perform the procedure and experience of the radiologist with suitable feedback by surgeon is necessary.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Arthroscopy؛ MRI؛ sensitivity؛ shoulder؛ specificity
مراجع
  1. Burkhart SS, Sanders TG, Denard PJ, Parsley BK. MRI and arthroscopy correlations of the shoulder: a case-based approach. Instr Course Lect. 2012; 61(2):185-200.
  2. Halma JJ, Eshuis R, Krebbers YM, Weits T, de Gast A. Interdisciplinary inter-observer agreement and accuracy of MR imaging of the shoulder with arthroscopic correlation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132(3):311-20.
  3. Nam EK, Snyder SJ. The diagnosis and treatment of superior labrum, anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions. Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31(5):798-810.
  4. Hegedus EJ, Goode AP, Cook CE, Michener L, Myer CA, Myer DM, et al. Which physical examination tests provide clinicians with the most value when examining the shoulder? Update of a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests. Br J Sports Med. 2012; 46(14):964-78.
  5. Hanchard NC, Lenza M, Handoll HH, Takwoingi Y. Physical tests for shoulder impingements and local lesions of bursa, tendon or labrum that may accompany impingement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 4(7):7427.
  6. Malhi AM, Khan R. Correlation between clinical diagnosis and arthroscopic findings of the shoulder. Postgrad Med J. 2005; 81(960):657-9.
  7. Hegedus EJ, Goode A, Campbell S, Morin A, Tamaddoni M, Moorman CT, et al. Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests. Br J Sports Med. 2008; 42(2):80-92.
  8. Sharma P, Morrison WB, Cohen S. Imaging of the shoulder with arthroscopic correlation. Clin Sports Med. 2013; 32(3):339-59.
  9. Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Takwoingi Y, Johnston RV, Hanchard NC, Faloppa F. Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 24(9):9020.
  10. Della Sala SW, Bianchini G. [Magnetic resonance in the study of the painful shoulder. The surgical comparison in 30 consecutive cases]. Radiol Med. 1996; 91(4):348-55.
  11. Vlychou M, Dailiana Z, Fotiadou A, Papanagiotou M, Fezoulidis IV, Malizos K. Symptomatic partial rotator cuff tears: diagnostic performance of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging with surgical correlation. Acta Radiol. 2009; 50(1):101-5.
  12. Kaplan PA, Bryans KC, Davick JP, Otte M, Stinson WW, Dussault RG. MR imaging of the normal shoulder: variants and pitfalls. Radiology. 1992; 184(2):519-24.
  13. Tuckman GA. Abnormalities of the long head of the biceps tendon of the shoulder: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994; 163(5):1183-8.
  14. Boden BP, Hanks GA, Chesnick RM. Diagnosis of biceps tendon dislocation by kinematic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Orthop. 1996; 25(10):709-11.
  15. Monu JU, Pope TL Jr, Chabon SJ, Vanarthos WJ. MR diagnosis of superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) injuries of the glenoid labrum: value of routine imaging without intraarticular injection of contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994; 163(6):1425-9.
  16. Hodler J, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder SJ, Cervilla V, Karzel RP, Schweitzer ME, et al. Rotator cuff disease: assessment with MR arthrography versus standard MR imaging in 36 patients with arthroscopic confirmation. Radiology. 1992; 182(2):431-6.
  17. Jee WH, McCauley TR, Katz LD, Matheny JM, Ruwe PA, Daigneault JP. Superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions of the glenoid labrum: reliability and accuracy of MR arthrography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2001; 218(1):127-32.
  18. Zlatkin MB. MRI of the shoulder. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2003; Chapter 7.
  19. Cvitanic O, Tirman PF, Feller JF, Bost FW, Minter J, Carroll KW. Using abduction and external rotation of the shoulder to increase the sensitivity of MR arthrography in revealing tears of the anterior glenoid labrum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 169(3):837-44.
  20. Sheridan K, Kreulen C, Kim S, Mak W, Lewis K, Marder R. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose superior labrum anterior-posterior tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 2(2):1-6.
  21. Kautzner J, Smetana P, Krotka I, Kos P, Frei R, Trc T. [Shoulder joint disorder: correlation of findings by arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008; 75(3):190-5.
  22. Robertson PL, Schweitzer ME, Mitchell DG, Schlesinger F, Epstein RE, Frieman BG, et al. Rotator cuff disorders: interobserver and intraobserver variation in diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1995; 194(3):831-5.
  23. Kirkley A, Litchfield R, Thain L, Spouge A. Agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic evaluation of the shoulder joint in primary anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Clin J Sport Med. 2003; 13(3):148-51.
  24. Hodler J, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Flannigan B, Snyder SJ, Karzel RP, Resnick D. Injuries of the superior portion of the glenoid labrum involving the insertion of the biceps tendon: MR imaging findings in nine cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 159(3):565-8.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,763
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,503