Preparation and characterization of different liposomal formulations containing P5 HER2/neu-derived peptide and evaluation of their immunological responses and antitumor effects | ||
| Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 18، شماره 5، مرداد 2015، صفحه 506-513 اصل مقاله (2 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/ijbms.2015.4415 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Sheida Shariat1؛ Ali Badiee2؛ Seyed Amir Jalali3؛ Mercedeh Mansourian2؛ Seyed Alireza Mortazavi1؛ Mahmoud Reza Jaafari* 4 | ||
| 1Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Nanotechnology Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Immunology, Medical School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Biotechnology Research Center, Nanotechnology Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Objective(s):Tumor-associated antigen (TAA) subunit-based vaccines constitute promising tools for anticancer immunotherapy. However, a major limitation in the development of such vaccines is the poor immunogenicity of peptides when used alone.The aim of this study was to develop an efficient vaccine delivery system and adjuvant to enhance anti-tumor activity of a synthetic HER2/neu derived peptide (P5). Materials and Methods: P5 peptide was encapsulated with different liposomal formulations composed of DMPC:DMPG:Chol:DOPE and loaded with monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL). All formulations were characterized for their physicochemical properties. To evaluate vaccine efficacy, BALB/c mice were first immunized with free peptide or liposomal formulations, then, inoculated with a subcutaneous injection of TUBO tumor cells. Enzyme-linked immunospot, cytotoxicity and intracellular cytokine assays, as well as tumor size and animal survival analysis, were performed to evaluate the immune responses. Results: The results demonstrated that P5 encapsulated into liposomal formulations was not able to induce CD8 and CD4 T cells to produce IFN-γ. That is why, a potent CTL response and antitumor immunity was not induced. Conclusion: The Lip-DOPE-P5-MPL formulation in spite of using pH-sensitive lipid to direct intracellular trafficking of peptide to MHC I presentation pathway and MPL to enhance peptide adjuvanticity was interesting. The failure in inducing anti-tumor immunity may be attributed to low uptake of anionic conventional liposomes by dendritic cells (DCs) that have negative surface charge. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Breast Cancer؛ CTL epitope؛ HER2/neu peptide؛ Peptide vaccine؛ pH-sensitive liposome | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Bllatman JN, Greenberg PD. Cancer immunotherapy: a treatment for the masses. Science 2004; 305:200-205.
2. Lewis JD, Reilly BD, Bright RK. Tumor-associated antigens: from discovery to immunity. Int Rev Immunol 2003; 22:81-112.
3. Krishnamachari Y, Greay SM, Lemke CD, Salem AK. Nanoparticle delivery systems in cancer vaccines. Pharm Res 2011; 28:215-236.
4. Gregory AE, Titball R, Williamson D. Vaccine delivery using nanoparticles. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2013; 3:13.
5. Watson DS, Endsley AN, Huang L. Design considerations for liposomal vaccines: influence of formulation parameters on antibody and cell-mediated immune responses to liposome associated antigens. Vaccine 2012; 30:2256-2272.
6. Alving CR. Liposomes as carriers of antigens and adjuvants. J Immunol Methods 1991; 140:1-13.
7. Nordly P, Madsen HB, Nielsen HM, Foged C. Status and future prospects of lipid-based particulate delivery systems as vaccine adjuvants and their combination with immunostimulators. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2009; 6:657-672.
8. Alving CR. Lipopolysaccharide, lipid A, and liposomes containing lipid A as immunologic adjuvants. Immunobiology 1993; 187:430-446.
9. Casella CR, Mitchell TC. Putting endotoxin to work for us: monophosphoryl lipid A as a safe and effective vaccine adjuvant. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008; 65:3231-3240.
10. Jalali SA, Sankian M, Tavakkol-Afshari J, Jaafari MR. Induction of tumor-specific immunity by multi-epitope rat HER2/neu-derived peptides encapsulated in LPD Nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 2012; 8:692-701.
11. Levin AA. A review of the issues in the pharmacokinetics and toxicology of phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotides. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999; 1489:69-84.
12. Yarden Y. Biology of HER2 and its importance in breast cancer. Oncology 2001; 61:1-13.
13. Ladjemi MZ, Jacot W, Chardes T, Pelegrin A, Navarro-Teulon I. Anti-HER2 vaccines: new prospects for breast cancer therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2010; 59:1295-1312.
14. Reddy R, Zhou F, Huang L, Carbone F, Bevan M, Rouse BT. PH sensitive liposomes provide an efficient means of sensitizing target cells to class I restricted CTL recognition of a soluble protein. J Immunol Methods 1991; 141:157-163.
15. Parkin J, Cohen B. An overview of the immune system. Lancet 2001; 357:1777-1789.
16. Shariat S, Badiee A, Jaafari MR, Mortazavi SA. Optimization of a method to prepare liposomes containing HER2/Neu- derived peptide as a vaccine delivery system for breast cancer. Iran J Pharm Res 2014; 13:15-25.
17. Harmon P, Cabral-Lilly D, Reed RA, Maurio FP, Franklin JC, Janoff A. The release and detection of endotoxin from liposomes. Anal Biochem 1997; 250:139-146.
18. Oussoren C, Storm G. Liposomes to target the lymphatics by subcutaneous administration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001; 50:143-156.
19. Steinman RM, Bonifaz L, Fujii S, Liu K, Bonnyay D, Yamazaki S, et al. The innate functions of dendritic cells in peripheral lymphoid tissues. Adv Exp Med Biol 2005; 560: 83-97.
20. Bachmann MF, Jennings GT. Vaccine delivery: a matter of size, geometry, kinetics and molecular patterns. Nat Rev Immunol 2010; 10:787-796.
21. Ardavin C, Amigorena S, Reise e Sousa C. Dendritic cells: immunobiology and cancer immunotherapy. Immunity 2004; 20:17-23.
22. Siegel DP, Epand RM. The mechanism of lamellar- to-inverted hexagonal phase transitions in phosphatidylethanolamine: implications for membrane fusion mechanisms. Biophys J 1997; 73:3089-3111.
23. Connor J, Yatvin MB, Huang L. PH-sensitive liposomes: acid-induced liposome fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984; 81:1715-1718.
24. Marciani DJ. Vaccine adjuvants: role and mechanisms of action in vaccine immunogenicity. Drug Discov Today 2003; 8:934-943.
25. Guy B. The perfect mix: recent progress in adjuvant research. Nat Rev Microbial 2007; 5: 505-517.
26. Foged C, Arigita C, Sundblad A, Jiskoot W, Storm G, Frokjaer S. Interaction of dendritic cells with antigen-containing liposomes: effect of bilayer composition. Vaccine 2004; 22: 1903-1913.
27. Watson DS, Endsley AN, Huang L. Design considerations for liposomal vaccines: influence of formulation parameters on antibody and cell-mediated immune responses to liposome associated antigens. Vaccine 2012; 30:2256-2272.
28. Mansourian M, Badiee A, Jalali SA, Shariat S, Yazdani M, Amin M, Jaafari MR. Effective induction of anti-tumor immunity using p5 HER-2/neu derived peptide encapsulated in fusogenic DOTAP cationic liposomes co-administrated with CpG-ODN. Immunol Lett 2014; 162:87-93.
29. Chikh G, Schutze-Redelmeier MP. Liposomal delivery of CTL epitopes to dendritic cells. Biosci Rep 2002; 22:339-353.
30. Nakanishi T, Kunisawa J, Hayashi A, Tsutsumi Y, Kubo K, Nakagawa S, et al. Positively charged liposome functions as an efficient immunoadjuvant in inducing immune responses to soluble proteins. Biochim Biophys Res Commun 1997; 240:793-797. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,157 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,456 |
||