Applied Endoscopic Anatomical Evaluation of the Lacrimal Sac | ||
| Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 27، شماره 3، مرداد 2015، صفحه 213-217 اصل مقاله (264.04 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/ijorl.2015.3821 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Seyyed Mostafa Hashemi1؛ Nazamoddin Berjis1؛ Afrooz Eshaghian* 1؛ Maryam Nejadnic2؛ Akram Fereidani Samani1 | ||
| 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
| 2Forensic Medical Center, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Introduction: Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), a popular surgical procedure, has been performed using an endoscopic approach over recent years. Excellent anatomical knowledge is required for this endoscopic surgical approach. This study was performed in order to better evaluate the anatomical features of the lacrimal apparatus from cadavers in the Isfahan forensic center as a sample of the Iranian population. Materials and Methods: DCR was performed using a standard method on 26 cadaver eyes from the forensic center of Isfahan. The lacrimal sac was exposed completely, then the anatomical features of the lacrimal sac and canaliculus were measured using a specified ruler. Results: A total of 26 male cadaveric eyes were used, of which four (16.7%) were probably non-Caucasian. Two (8%) of the eyes needed septoplasty, one (4%) needed uncinectomy, and none needed turbinoplasty. Four (16%) lacrimal sacs were anterior to axilla, one (4%) was posterior and 20 (80%) were at the level of the axilla of the middle turbinate. The distance from the nasal sill to the anterior edge of the lacrimal sac (from its mid-height) was 39.04 (±4.92) mm. The distance from the nasal sill to the posterior edge of the lacrimal sac (from its mid-height) was 45.50 (±4.47) mm. The width and length of the lacrimal sac was 7.54 (±1.44) mm and 13.16 (±5.37) mm, respectively. The distance from the anterior edge of the lacrimal sac to the posterior edge of the uncinate process was 14.06 (±3.00) mm, while the distance from the anterior nasal spine to the anterior edge of the lacrimal sac (from its mid-height) was 37.20 (±5.37) mm.The height of the fundus was 3.26 (±1.09) mm. The distance from the superior punctum to the fundus was 12.70 (±1.45) mm, and the distance from the inferior punctum to the fundus was 11.10 (±2.02) mm. Conclusion: Given the differences between the various studies conducted in order to evaluate the position of the lacrimal sac, studies such as this can help to better identify the position of lacrimal sac during surgery based on ethnic differences. In addition, these studies can help novice surgeons to better navigate in a surgical scenario. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Anatomy؛ Endoscpic sinus surgery؛ Iacrimal sac | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1]. McDonogh M, Meiring JH. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol 1989; 103(6):585–7.
2. Weitzel EK, Wormald P. Endocsopic Dacryosysto- rhinostomy In: Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier Publication; 2010. p. 797-801.
3. Becelli R, Renzi G, Mannino G, Cerulli G, Iannetti G. Posttraumatic obstruction of lacrimal pathways: a retrospective analysis of 58 consecutive naso-orbitoethmoid fractures. J Craniofac Surg 2004; 15(1):29–33.
4. Raut VV, Yung MW, Logan BM. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: anatomical approach. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2000;121(1):53–5.
5. Moore WM, Bentley CR, Olver JM. Functional and anatomic results after two types of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical and holmium laser. Ophthalmology 2002;109(8):1575-82.
6. Kashkouli MB, Parvaresh M, Modarreszadeh M, Hashemi M, Beigi B. Factors affecting the success of external dacryocystorhinostomy.Orbit 2003;22: 247-55.
7. Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87(1):43–7.
8. Rootman D, DeAngelis D, Tucker N, Wu A, Hurwitz J. Cadaveric anatomical comparison of the lateral nasal wall after external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 28(2):149–53.
9. Ricardo LA1, Nakanishi M, Fava AS. Transillumination-guided study of the endoscopic anatomy of the lacrimal fossa. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2010;76(1):34–9.
10. Chastain JB, Cooper MH, Sindwani R. The maxillary line: anatomic characterization and clinical utility of an important surgical landmark. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(6):990–2.
11. Kim YH, Park MG, Kim GC, Park BS, Kwak HH. Topography of the nasolacrimal duct on the lateral nasal wall in Koreans. Surg Radiol Anat 2012; 34(3):249-55.
12. Kumar GC1, Kumar A, Nayak SR, Krishnamurthy A, D'Costa S, Ramanathan L. Morphology of the lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct in adult human cadaver. Bratisl Lek Listy 2009; 110(11):740–3. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,398 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,115 |
||