The effect of educational intervention based on self-regulation strategies on physical activity in women with type 2 diabetes | ||
| Evidence Based Care | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 2، شماره 4، فروردین 2013، صفحه 7-17 اصل مقاله (208.67 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Quantitative and Qualitative Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/ebcj.2013.363 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Noushin Peyman1؛ Ali Taghipour2؛ Mehrosadat Mahdizadeh* 3؛ Habibolah Esmaeely4 | ||
| 1Assistant professor in health education and Health Promotion, Health Sciences Research Center, Department of Health and Management, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant professor in epidemiology, Health Sciences Research Center, Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 3MS in Health Education and Health Promotion, Health Sciences Research Center, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 4Associated professor in Biostatistics, Health Sciences Research Center, Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Regular physical activity is one of the most important factors in creating, maintaining and promoting health, which is not enough in women with diabetes due to the high prevalence of obesity. Aim: This study aimed to determine the effect of educational intervention on self-regulation strategies in promoting physical activity in women with type 2 diabetes. Methods: This study was a randomized controlled trial in which 82 women with type 2 diabetes were allocated randomly to intervention and control groups. Data collection tools consisted of questionnaires to assess knowledge, goal setting, planning and physical activity. Educational intervention to promote physical activity was performed in 7 sessions of 60-minute through goal setting and planning for physical activity and behavioral self evaluation. Program evaluation was performed before and immediately after intervention and at follow-up period. The data were analyzed with SPSS software Version 11.5 using repeated measures ANOVA and T testes (P<0.05). Results: The mean age of participants was 49.07±6.26. The intervention group was significantly different in relation to goals (P<0.001), planning (P<0.008), knowledge (P<0.001), physical activity (P<0.004) in evaluation period. Also experimental group showed a significant decrease in FBS (From 164.78±46.38 to 150.73±37.55, P< 0.019) and BMI (From 70.43±9.93 to 68.39±6.62, P< 0.001) at the follow up period, the data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 11.5, the repeated mager ANOVA, T testes (P<0.05). Results: The mean age of participants was 49.07±6.26. The intervention group was significantly different in relation to goals (P<0.001), planning (P<0.008), knowledge (P<0.001), physical activity (P<0.004) in evaluation period. Also experimental group showed a significant decrease in FBS (From 164.78±46.38 to 150.73±37.55, P< 0.019) and BMI (From 70.43±9.93 to 68.39±6.62, P< 0.001) at the flow up period compared with the time before intervention. Conclusion: Educational intervention through self-regulation strategies lead to increase physical activity, improved FBS and BMI in women with type 2 diabetes. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| health education؛ Self-assessment؛ Type 2 diabetes؛ Physical Activity | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Salehi L, Taghdisi M, Ghasemi H, SHokroush B. Facilitating Factors and Barriers of Physical Activity in Elderly in Tehran. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology. 2007;6(2):9-15.(Persian)
2. Currie SL. Applying the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Persons with Prediabetes and Diabetes: An Examination of Intention and Behaviour for Healthy Eating and Physical Activity [NR63652]. Canada: Dalhousie University; 2010.
3. Yeaw J, Lee WC, Aagren M, Christensen T. Cost of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in the United States Among Patients on Insulin Regimen for Diabetes. JMCP. 2012;18(1):21.
4. Didarloo A, Shojaeizadeh D, Ardebili HE, Niknami S, Hajizadeh E, Alizadeh M. Factors Influencing Physical Activity Behavior among Iranian Women with Type 2 Diabetes Using the Extended Theory of Reasoned Action. DM J. 2011;35(5):513.
5. Ghazanfari Z, Niknami S, Ghofranipour F, Hajizadeh E, Montazeri A. Development and Psychometric Properties of Belief-Based Physical Activity Questionnaire for Diabetic Patients (PAQ-DP). BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10(1):104.
6. Vail-Gandolfo N. The Effects of Motivational Program on Glycemic Control, Physical Activity and Weight Loss in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [3343411]. United States - New York: Hofstra University; 2008.
7. Stebsari F. The Effect of Educational Intervention on Physical Activity. J Payavard Salamat. 2009;2(4):56 -63. (Persian)
8. Ebrahim K, Ramezanpour M, Sahraei A. Effect of Eight Weeks of Aerobic and Progressive Exercises on Changes of Estrogen Hormone and Effective Factors on Bone Mass in Menopaused Sedentary Women. Iranian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2010;12(4):401-8. (Persian)
9. Ghazanfari Z, Niknami S, Ghofranipour F, Larijani B. Regular Physical Activity from Perspective of Females with Diabetes: A Qualitative Study. J ofoghe-Danesh 2009;15(2):5-15. (Persian)
10. Norouzi A, GHofranipour F, Haidarnia A, Tahmasbi R. Factors Influencing the Pattern of Regular Physical Activity on Health Promotion in Diabetic Women Referred to the Diabetes Association Branch. Teb-e-Jonooob. 2010;13(1):41-51. (Persian)
11. Baghianimoghadam MH, HadavandKhani M, Mohammadi SM, Fallahzade H, khabiri F. Status of Walking Behavior in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Yazd Based on Health Belief Model. Journal of health system Research. 2010;6(3):425-35.(Persian)
12. Bandura A. Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means. Health Education & Behavior. 2004;31(2):143.
13. Jayne RL, Rankin SH. Application of Leventhal's Self-Regulation Model to Chinese Immigrants with Type 2 Diabetes. J Nurs Scholar. 2001;First Quarter,33(1).
14. Wilson DK, Griffin S, Saunders RP, Evans A, Mixon G, Wright M, et al. Formative Evaluation of Motivational Intervention for Increasing Physical Activity in Underserved Youth. Eval Program Plann. 2006;29(3):260-8.
15. Martin Ginis KA, Latimer AE, Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Bassett RL, Wolfe DL, Hanna SE. Determinants of Physical Activity Among People with Spinal Cord Injury: a Test of Social Cognitive Theory. Ann Behav Med. 2011;42(1):127-33.
16. Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett RA, Williams DM. Social-Cognitive Determinants of Physical Activity: The Influence of Social Support, Self-Efficacy, Outcome Expectations and Self-Regulation among Participants in Church-Based Health Promotion Study. Health Psychol J. 2006;25(4):510.
17. Macdonald A, Palfai T. Predictors of Exercise Behavior among University Student Women: Utility of Goal-Systems/Self-Regulation Theory Framework. Pers Individ Dif J. 2008;44(4):921-31.
18. Nehl EJ. Exploring Ethnic Specific Physical Activity Correlates among University Students Using the Social Cognitive Theory: INDIANA UNIVERSITY; 2009:310
19. Umstattd MR, Saunders R, Wilcox S, Valois RF, Dowda M. Correlates of Self-Regulation for Physical Activity among Older Adults. Am J Health Behav. 2006;30(6):710-9.
20. Conn VS, Hafdahl AR, Moore SM, Nielsen PJ, Brown LM. Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Increase Physical Activity among Cardiac Subjects. Int J Cardiol. 2009;133(3):307-20.
21. Cellar DF, Stuhlmacher AF, Young SK, Fisher DM, Adair CK, Haynes S, et al. Trait Goal Orientation, Self-Regulation, and Performance: A Meta-Analysis. J Bus Psychol. 2011;26(4):467-83.
22. Bandura A. Self Efficacy: the Exercise of Contorol. New York,NY: WHfreeman and Company. 1997.
23. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychol rev. 1977;84(2):191.
24. Bandura A. Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):248-87.
25. Anthonys F. Principales of Internal Medicaling Harison (Metabolic & Endocrine Disorders). In: Ghazal, editor. 17 ed: Arjmand; 2008. p. 319-20.
26. Bonner JE. Social-cognitive Predictors of Physical Activity Initiation in Type 2 Diabetes Following Diabetes Self-Management Education: Application of the Health Action Process Approach [3451131]. United States -- Kentucky: University of Louisville; 2010.
27. Norouzi A, R T, F G, A H. Effect of Health Promotion Model (HPM) Based Education on Physical Activity in Diabetic Women. Iranian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 2011 13 (4 ):361-432. (Persian)
28. Hazavehei M, Asadi Z, Hassanzadeh A, Shekarchizadeh P. Comparing the Effect of Two Methods of Presenting Physical Education 2 Course on the Attitudes and Practices of Female Students towards Regular Physical Activity in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2008;8(1):121-30. (Persian)
29. International Physical Activity Questionnaire. http://wwwipaqkise/ipaqhtm.
30. Mui WH. Cognitive Determinants of Physical Activity and Their Inter-Relationships with Mental Distress and Diabetes Self-Care in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [3483886]. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong); 2010.
31. SeyyedEmami R, eftekharardabili H, Golestan B. Affectivness Of Education about physical Activity on Know. J Hayat 2010;16(3,4):55-48. (Persian)
32. Kazemi A, Eftekhar-Ardabili H, Nekuei N. Pattern of Physical Activity and the Promoters among Adolescent Girls of Isfahan. J Qazvin Uni Med Sci. 2011;15(1):39-47. (Persian)
33. IPAQ Scoring Protocol. http://wwwipaqkise/scoringhtm.
34. Shamsi M, Sharifirad G, Kachoyee A, Hassanzadeh A. The Effect of Educational Program Walking Based on HealtBelief Model on Control Suger in Woman by Type 2 Diabetics. Iranian Journal of Endocrinology & Metabolism 2009;11 (5):490-9. (Persian)
35. Schwarzer R, Luszczynska A, Ziegelmann JP, Scholz U, Lippke S. Social-Cognitive Predictors of Physical Exercise Adherence: Three Longitudinal Studies in Rehabilitation. Health Psychol. 2008;27(1):54.
36. Hortz BV. Evaluation of Social Cognitive Theory Based Physical Activity Intervention Targeting Leisure Time Physical Exercise [3179682]. United States -- Ohio: The Ohio State University; 2005.
37. Wilson KS, Spink KS, Priebe CS. Self-Regulatory Efficacy and Activity: Examining Gradations of Challenge. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2011;12(6):579-82.
38. Pakpour AH, Zeidi IM, Chatzisarantis N, Molsted S, Harrison AP, Plotnikoff RC. Effects of Action Planning and Coping Planning within the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Physical Activity Study of Patients Undergoing Haemodialysis. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2011;12(6):609-14.
39. Allen NA, Fain JA, Braun B, Chipkin SR. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Counseling Improves Physical Activity Behaviors of Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;80(3):371-9.
40. Tabatabaei SVA, Taghdisi MH, N N, Balali. F. Effect of Educational Intervention Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour on the Physical Activities of Kerman Health Centers Staff. J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2010;12(2). (Persian)
41. Ahadian M, Ramezani O, Mohammadi D. Fundamentals of Instructional Technology. 8nd ed. tehran: Aeizh; 2009. (Persian)
42. Kashfi S, jyhouni A, khalili RB, Hatami M. Evaluation of the Effects of Educating about Nutrition and Physical Activity on the Blood Sugar of Type II Diabetic Patients of a Clinic in Shiraz, Iran. J Hakim. 2009;12(3):54-60. (Persian) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,992 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,173 |
||