سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

Sardar Muhamad-Najeeb, Sara, Abdilmagid Abdilkarim, Dana. (1404). Autologous Fat Grafting versus Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Cheek Augmentation: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Outcomes and Considerations. , 13(4), 261-270. doi: 10.22038/psj.2025.90735.1484
Sara Sardar Muhamad-Najeeb; Dana Abdilmagid Abdilkarim. "Autologous Fat Grafting versus Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Cheek Augmentation: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Outcomes and Considerations". , 13, 4, 1404, 261-270. doi: 10.22038/psj.2025.90735.1484
Sardar Muhamad-Najeeb, Sara, Abdilmagid Abdilkarim, Dana. (1404). 'Autologous Fat Grafting versus Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Cheek Augmentation: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Outcomes and Considerations', , 13(4), pp. 261-270. doi: 10.22038/psj.2025.90735.1484
Sardar Muhamad-Najeeb, Sara, Abdilmagid Abdilkarim, Dana. Autologous Fat Grafting versus Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Cheek Augmentation: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Outcomes and Considerations. , 1404; 13(4): 261-270. doi: 10.22038/psj.2025.90735.1484

Autologous Fat Grafting versus Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Cheek Augmentation: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Outcomes and Considerations

Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Improvement
دوره 13، شماره 4، دی 2025، صفحه 261-270    اصل مقاله (617.08 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/psj.2025.90735.1484
نویسندگان
Sara Sardar Muhamad-Najeeb* 1؛ Dana Abdilmagid Abdilkarim2
1Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sulaymaniyah, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
2MBChB, FIBMS, Assistant Professor and Consultant Plastic Surgeon Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sulaymaniyah, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
چکیده
Introduction:
Cheek augmentation is a popular aesthetic procedure, with autologous fat grafting (lipofilling) and hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers being the most common techniques. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy, complication rates, and psychological impact of lipofilling versus HA fillers for cheek augmentation.
 Materials and Methods:
A prospective cohort study was conducted from August 2024 until August 2025 at the University of Sulaimani and one private clinics in Iraq. Forty adult women seeking elective cheek augmentation were enrolled and allocated to either lipofilling (n=20) or HA filler (n=20) groups. Outcomes were assessed using the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Cheeks module, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, Derriford Appearance Scale-24 (DAS-24), and standardized photography at multiple timepoints up to 12 months. Complications and psychological effects were systematically recorded.
 Results:
The mean age was 32.25 ± 4.40 years (filler) and 36.55 ± 4.58 years (lipofilling). Satisfaction was high in both groups, with 100% of lipofilling and 85% of filler patients "very satisfied" with cheek appearance. Complications were more frequent in the lipofilling group (asymmetry 10%, swelling 55%, donor site bruising 15%) compared to the filler group (bruising 50%, p≤0.001). Lipofilling showed higher evenness satisfaction (75% vs. 35%, p=0.025) and better DAS-24 scores, indicating improved psychological adaptation.
 Conclusion:
Both lipofilling and HA fillers are effective for cheek augmentation, with lipofilling offering more natural and even results but a higher minor complication rate. Individualized treatment selection is recommended.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Aesthetic surgery؛ Cheek augmentation؛ Dermal fillers؛ Fat grafting؛ Hyaluronic acid
مراجع
  1. Swift A, Liew S, Weinkle S, Garcia JK, Silberberg MB. The Facial Aging Process From the "Inside Out". Aesthetic surgery journal. 2021;41(10):1107-19. https://doi. org/10. 1093/ asj/sjaa339
  2. Reilly MJ, Tomsic JA, Fernandez SJ, Davison SP. Effect of facial rejuvenation surgery on perceived attractiveness, femininity, and personality. JAMA facial plastic surgery. 2015;17(3):202-7. https:// doi.org/ 10.1001/ jamafacial. 2015.0158
  3. Truswell WHt. Aging changes of the periorbita, cheeks, and midface. Facial plastic surgery : FPS. 2013;29(1):3-12. https://doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0033-1333840
  4. Prantl L, Brix E, Kempa S, Felthaus O, Eigenberger A, Brébant V, et al. Facial Rejuvenation with Concentrated Lipograft-A 12 Month Follow-Up Study. Cells. 2021;10(3):594. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10030594
  5. Kozhakhmetova E. Lipofilling for facial reconstruction: Vilniaus universitetas.; 2024.
  6. Guo J, Fang W, Wang F. Injectable fillers: current status, physicochemical properties, function mechanism, and perspectives. RSC advances. 2023;13(34):23841-58. https:// doi.org/ 10.1039/d3ra04321e
  7. Kaul A, Singampalli KL, Parikh UM, Yu L, Keswani SG, Wang X. Hyaluronan, a double-edged sword in kidney diseases. Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany). 2022;37(4):735-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-021-05113 -9
  8. Michon A, Hassan H. Is More Better? Benefits of Hyaluronic Acid Soft Tissue Filler on the Psychological- and Social-Related Quality of Life Dimensions. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022;4:ojac086. https:// doi.org/ 10. 1093/ asjof/ ojac086
  9. Gallo L, Kim P, Churchill IF, Gallo M, Yuan M, Voineskos SH, et al. Measuring the Impact of Surgical and Non-surgical Facial Cosmetic Interventions Using FACE-Q Aesthetic Module Scales: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plastic Surgery. 2025;33(3):403-18. https:// doi.org/ 10.1177/22925503231225480
  10. Nasim S, Nasim H, Kauke M, Safi AF. Autologous fat grafting for cosmetic temporal augmentation: a systematic review. Front Surg. 2024;11:1410162. https:// doi.org/10. 3389/fsurg. 2024.1410162
  11. Schultz KP, Raghuram A, Davis MJ, Abu-Ghname A, Chamata E, Rohrich RJ. Fat Grafting for Facial Rejuvenation. Semin Plast Surg. 2020;34(1):30-7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402767
  12. Krastev TK, Schop SJ, Hommes J, Piatkowski A, van der Hulst RRWJ. Autologous fat transfer to treat fibrosis and scar-related conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2020;73(11):2033-48. https:// doi.org/ 10. 1016/ j.bjps.2020.08.023
  13. Gornitsky J, Viezel-Mathieu A, Alnaif N, Azzi AJ, Gilardino MS. A systematic review of the effectiveness and complications of fat grafting in the facial region. JPRAS open. 2019;19(1):87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2018.12.004
  14. Stojanovič L, Majdič N. Effectiveness and safety of hyaluronic acid fillers used to enhance overall lip fullness: A systematic review of clinical studies. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2019;18(2):436-43. https:// doi.org/ 10.1111/ jocd. 12861
  15. Hong GW, Hu H, Chang K, Park Y, Lee KWA, Chan LKW, et al. Review of the Adverse Effects Associated with Dermal Filler Treatments: Part I Nodules, Granuloma, and Migration. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(15):1-11. https:// doi.org/ 10.3390/ diagnostics14151640
  16. McKeown DJ. Impact of Minimally Invasive Aesthetic Procedures on the Psychological and Social Dimensions of Health. Plastic and reconstructive surgery Global open. 2021; 9(4): e3578. https:// doi.org/ 10.1097/ gox. 0000000000003578
  17. Cohen JL, Rivkin A, Dayan S, Shamban A, Werschler WP, Teller CF, et al. Multimodal Facial Aesthetic Treatment on the Appearance of Aging, Social Confidence, and Psychological Well-being: HARMONY Study. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2021;42(2):NP115-NP24. https:// doi.org/ 10. 1093/ asj/sjab114
  18. Bahaa S, David G, Carolyn De La C, Lauren K. Fat grafting in autologous breast reconstruction: applications, outcomes, safety, and complications. Plastic and Aesthetic Research. 2023; 10:12. https://doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264. 2022.91
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 188
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 278