سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

Binaei, Fatemeh, Kahlaee, Amir, Mohseni Bandpei, Mohammad, Rahmani, Nahid, Taghizadeh Delkhoush, Cyrus, Saatchi, Mohammad, Goudarzi, Hamidreza. (1404). Reliability of Image J Software to Evaluate the Craniovertebral Angle in Participants with and without Neck Pain. , 13(12), 849-856. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2025.86598.3935
Fatemeh Binaei; Amir Hossein Kahlaee; Mohammad Ali Mohseni Bandpei; Nahid Rahmani; Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhoush; Mohammad Saatchi; Hamidreza Goudarzi. "Reliability of Image J Software to Evaluate the Craniovertebral Angle in Participants with and without Neck Pain". , 13, 12, 1404, 849-856. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2025.86598.3935
Binaei, Fatemeh, Kahlaee, Amir, Mohseni Bandpei, Mohammad, Rahmani, Nahid, Taghizadeh Delkhoush, Cyrus, Saatchi, Mohammad, Goudarzi, Hamidreza. (1404). 'Reliability of Image J Software to Evaluate the Craniovertebral Angle in Participants with and without Neck Pain', , 13(12), pp. 849-856. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2025.86598.3935
Binaei, Fatemeh, Kahlaee, Amir, Mohseni Bandpei, Mohammad, Rahmani, Nahid, Taghizadeh Delkhoush, Cyrus, Saatchi, Mohammad, Goudarzi, Hamidreza. Reliability of Image J Software to Evaluate the Craniovertebral Angle in Participants with and without Neck Pain. , 1404; 13(12): 849-856. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2025.86598.3935

Reliability of Image J Software to Evaluate the Craniovertebral Angle in Participants with and without Neck Pain

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
مقاله 11، دوره 13، شماره 12، اسفند 2025، صفحه 849-856    اصل مقاله (962.09 K)
نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2025.86598.3935
نویسندگان
Fatemeh Binaei1؛ Amir Hossein Kahlaee2؛ Mohammad Ali Mohseni Bandpei3؛ Nahid Rahmani* 2؛ Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhoush4؛ Mohammad Saatchi5؛ Hamidreza Goudarzi6
1Clinical Research Development Center, Rofeideh Rehabilitation Hospital, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran -Neuromusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Neuromusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran -Department of Physical Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Department of Physical Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran -University Institute of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
4Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran -Department of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
5Personalized Medicine and Genometabolomics Research Center, Hope Generation Foundation, Tehran, Iran. -Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Science, Tehran, Iran
6Mathematics Department, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran
چکیده
Objectives: Forward head posture (FHP) is one of the most common postural disorders affecting the head and neck region, typically assessed by measuring the craniovertebral angle (CVA). Selecting an appropriate tool for quantifying this angle is crucial. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of ImageJ software in assessing the CVA in participants with and without neck pain.
Methods: The study included twenty participants with neck pain and twenty without. Reflective markers were placed on the tragus of the ear and the spinous process of C7. Three lateral images were captured from the dominant side while the participants were seated, with measurements taken at two-hour and one-week intervals. The craniovertebral angle (CVA) was then analyzed using ImageJ software.
Results: The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) values for both within-day and between-day reliability in both groups ranged from 0.89 to 0.94. The Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) ranged from 0.92° to 1.02°, while the Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) values ranged from 2.56° to 2.84°. Furthermore, the absolute Technical Error of Measurement (TEM) ranged from 0.91° to 1.06°, and the relative TEM (rTEM) ranged from 2.13% to 2.42%.
Conclusion: ImageJ software appears to be a suitable tool for assessing the craniovertebral angle (CVA) in individuals with or without neck pain, demonstrating good to excellent reliability.
        Level of evidence: III
کلیدواژه‌ها
Cranial؛ Neck pain؛ Reliability؛ Software؛ Vertebrae
مراجع
  1. Kim DH, Kim CJ, Son SM. Neck Pain in Adults with Forward Head Posture: Effects of Craniovertebral Angle and Cervical Range of Motion. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2018;9(6):309-313. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.6.04.
  2. Ehsani F, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Fernández-De-Las-Peñas C, Javanshir K. Neck pain in Iranian school teachers: Prevalence and risk factors. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018;22(1):64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.04.003.
  3. Amin M, Behdarvandan A, Saadat M, et al. Reliability of Diagnostic Tests for Movement System Impairment-based Categories of Mechanical Neck Pain. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2025;13(2):106-113. doi:10.22038/ABJS.2024.79331.3635 /ABJS.2024.79331.3635.
  4. Dabiri SR, Tehrani MR, Omidi-Kashani F, et al. The Responsiveness of Three Persian Outcome Measures Following Physiotherapy Intervention in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(5):356-364. doi:10.22038/ABJS.2023.68253.3227 /ABJS.2023.68253.3227.
  5. Wroński Z, Klasic M, Gjinovci B. Influence of physiotherapy on forward head posture and related problems–a critical review of literature. Physiotherapy Review. 2024;28(1):22-32.
  6. Ramalingam V, Subramaniam A. Prevalence and associated risk factors of forward head posture among university students. Indian J. Public Health Res. Dev. 2019;10:775.
  7. Ali M, Ashraf N, Khan S, et al. Incidence of forward head posture in mobile gamers: cross sectional study. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2022;16(04):766-.
  8. Aafreen A, Khan A, Khan A, et al. Prevalence of Forward head posture among car and bike drivers and its relation with neck and cardiopulmonary health parameters- a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2024;19(8):e0307016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307016.
  9. Goodarzi F, Rahnama L, Karimi N, Baghi R, Jaberzadeh S. The Effects of Forward Head Posture on Neck Extensor Muscle Thickness: An Ultrasonographic Study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018;41(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.07.012.
  10. Salahzadeh Z, Maroufi N, Ahmadi A, et al. Assessment of forward head posture in females: observational and photogrammetry methods. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(2):131-9. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130426.
  11. Kong YS, Kim YM, Shim JM. The effect of modified cervical exercise on smartphone users with forward head posture. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(2):328-331. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.328.
  12. Sun A, Yeo HG, Kim TU, Hyun JK, Kim JY. Radiologic assessment of forward head posture and its relation to myofascial pain syndrome. Ann Rehabil Med. 2014;38(6):821-6. doi: 10.5535/arm.2014.38.6.821.
  13. Raoofi Z, Sarrafzadeh J, Emrani A, Ghorbanpour A. Relationship between forward head posture and neck pain as well as disability. J Clin Physiother Res. 2019;4(1):e5.
  14. Mohmpud NF, Hassan KA, Abdelmajeed SF, Moustafa IM, Silva AG. The Relationship Between Forward Head Posture and Neck Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12(4):562-577. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09594-y.
  15. Cheung Lau HM, Wing Chiu TT, Lam TH. Clinical measurement of craniovertebral angle by electronic head posture instrument: a test of reliability and validity. Man Ther. 2009;14(4):363-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.05.004.
  16. Gadotti IC, Armijo-Olivo S, Silveira A, Magee D. Reliability of the craniocervical posture assessment: visual and angular measurements using photographs and radiographs. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013;36(9):619-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.09.002.
  17. Subbarayalu AV. Measurement of craniovertebral angle by the Modified Head Posture Spinal Curvature Instrument: A reliability and validity study. Physiother Theory Pract.
 

        2016;32(2):144-52. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1099172.

  1. Moghadam RE, Rahnama L, Karimi N, Amiri M, Rahnama M. An ultrasonographic investigation of deep neck flexor muscles cross-sectional area in forward and normal head posture. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018;22(3):643-647. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.11.002.
  2. Aafreen, Khan A, Ahmad A, et al. Clinimetric properties of a smartphone application to measure the craniovertebral angle in different age groups and positions. Heliyon. 2023;9(9):e19336. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19336.
  3. Lee JH, Hwang UJ, Kwon OY. Comparison of muscle thickness and changing ratio for cervical flexor muscles during the craniocervical flexion test between subjects with and without forward head posture. Physical Therapy Korea. 2022;29(3):180-6.
  4. Kırteke F, Baştürk S, Zengin HY, Söke F, Kızılay E, Gündüz AG. The Validity and Reliability of Knee Joint Position Sense Measurement Performed With Image-Capture Technique in Stroke Patients. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal. 2021;8(1):148-60.
  5. Suzuki T, Hashisdate H, Fujisawa Y, et al. Reliability of measurement using Image J for reach distance and movement angles in the functional reach test. J Phys Ther Sci. 2021;33(2):112-117. doi: 10.1589/jpts.33.112.
  6. Ashnagar Z, Hadian MR, Olyaei G, et al. Reliability of digital photography for assessing lower extremity alignment in individuals with flatfeet and normal feet types. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017;21(3):704-710. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.12.006.
  7. Ghamkhar L, Kahlaee AH. Is forward head posture relevant to cervical muscles performance and neck pain? A case-control study. Braz J Phys Ther. 2019;23(4):346-354. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.08.007.
  8. Bokaee F, Rezasoltani A, Manshadi FD, Naimi SS, Baghban AA, Azimi H. Comparison of cervical muscle thickness between asymptomatic women with and without forward head posture. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017;21(3):206-211. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.04.003.
  9. Albuquerque P, Da Silva EPC, Melo TMS, et al. Inter-rater Accuracy and Reliability of a Palpation Protocol of the C7 Spinous Process Comprising a Combination of 3 Traditional Palpation Techniques. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2022;45(3):227-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.06.001.
  10. Angelakopoulos N, Galić I, De Luca S, et al. Skeletal age assessment by measuring planar projections of carpals and distal epiphyses of ulna and radius bones in a sample of South African subadults. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2022;54(1):75-87.
  11. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
  12. Hida M, Wada C, Imai R, et al.: Spinal postural alignment measurements using markerless digital photography. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020;28(3):2309499020960834. doi: 10.1177/2309499020960834.
  13. Maeoka H, Fukumoto T, Sakaguchi A, et al. Reliability of a Software ImageJ in Motion Measurement Use of Sit-to-Stand Movements. Rigakuryoho Kagaku. 2008; 23:529-33. doi:10.1589/rika.23.529.
  14. Relph N, Herrington L. Interexaminer, intraexaminer and test-retest reliability of clinical knee joint-position-sense measurements using an image-capture technique. J Sport Rehabil. 2015;24(2):2013-0134. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2013-0134.
  15. Gallego-Izquierdo T, Arroba-Díaz E, García-Ascoz G, Del Alba Val-Cano M, Pecos-Martin D, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R. Psychometric Proprieties of a Mobile Application to Measure the Craniovertebral Angle a Validation and Reliability Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6521. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186521.
  16. Perini TA, Oliveira GL, Ornellas JD, Oliveira FP. Technical error of measurement in anthropometry. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte. 2005;11:81-5.
  17. Masoudi P, Karimi N, Abdollahi I, Bakhshi E, Moravej S, Aghazadeh A. Applicability of using dynamic MRI to evaluate alleged cranial rhythmic impulse (CRI). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):941. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08064-y.
 

 

 

 

 

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 277
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 130