سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

Dretakis, Konstantinos, Raptis, Konstantinos, Koutserimpas, Christos. (1403). The Use of the Robotic Arm-Assisted System (MAKO) for Hip Revision Surgery. , 12(8), 608-611. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2024.77543.3582
Konstantinos Dretakis; Konstantinos Raptis; Christos Koutserimpas. "The Use of the Robotic Arm-Assisted System (MAKO) for Hip Revision Surgery". , 12, 8, 1403, 608-611. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2024.77543.3582
Dretakis, Konstantinos, Raptis, Konstantinos, Koutserimpas, Christos. (1403). 'The Use of the Robotic Arm-Assisted System (MAKO) for Hip Revision Surgery', , 12(8), pp. 608-611. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2024.77543.3582
Dretakis, Konstantinos, Raptis, Konstantinos, Koutserimpas, Christos. The Use of the Robotic Arm-Assisted System (MAKO) for Hip Revision Surgery. , 1403; 12(8): 608-611. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2024.77543.3582

The Use of the Robotic Arm-Assisted System (MAKO) for Hip Revision Surgery

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
مقاله 10، دوره 12، شماره 8، آبان 2024، صفحه 608-611    اصل مقاله (845.39 K)
نوع مقاله: CASE REPORT
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2024.77543.3582
نویسندگان
Konstantinos Dretakis1؛ Konstantinos Raptis2؛ Christos Koutserimpas* 3
12nd Department of Orthopaedics, “Hygeia” General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
22nd Department of Orthopaedics, “Hygeia” General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece -Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, “251” Hellenic Air Force General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
3Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
چکیده
The robotic arm-assisted system (MAKO) has pioneered a transformative approach to hip joint restoration, excelling in reinstating innate hip joint anatomy and biomechanics. This case represents the initial application of the system in revision surgery following a cut-out complication. A 69-year-old female, previously independent and mobile, presented with left hip pain. X-rays revealed a cut-out complication of the proximal nail, necessitating revision to total hip arthroplasty due to the patient''s prior activity level and implant prominence. Utilizing the robotic system, preoperative planning accurately identified limb length discrepancy and guided implant sizing. The system facilitated precise acetabular reaming and optimal component placement. The patient regained functional independence. This report also underscores the system''s potential for accurate acetabulum component placement and restoration of hip joint anatomy and biomechanics in revision cases. Future advancements in this technology may expand its role in complex reconstructions and revisions, further enhancing patient outcomes in hip arthroplasty.
        Level of evidence: V
کلیدواژه‌ها
Hip biomechanics؛ Hip joint anatomy؛ MAKO؛ Revision hip؛ Robotics؛ Total hip arthroplasty
مراجع
  1. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007; 370:1508-19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7.
  2. Bullock EKC, Brown MJ, Clark G, Plant JGA, Blakeney WG. Robotics in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Current Concepts. J Clin Med. 2022; 11:6674. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226674.
  3. Koutserimpas C, Piagkou M, Karaiskos I, et al. Modified Anterolateral Minimally Invasive Surgery (ALMIS) for Total Hip Replacement: Anatomical Considerations, Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59:1520. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091520.
  4. Perazzini P, Trevisan M, Sembenini P, et al. The Mako ™ robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach: surgical technique, skills and pitfals. Acta Biomed. 2020; 91:21-30. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9659.
  5. Kim K, Kwon S, Kwon J, Hwang J. A review of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty. Biomed Eng Lett. 2023; 13:523-535. doi: 10.1007/s13534-023-00312-9.
  6. Sato K, Sato A, Okuda N, Masaaki M, Koga H. A propensity score-matched comparison between Mako robotic arm-assisted system and conventional technique in total hip arthroplasty for patients with osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 143:2755-2761. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04524-z.
  7. Subramanian P, Wainwright TW, Bahadori S, Middleton RG. A review of the evolution of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2019; 29:232-238. doi: 10.1177/1120700019828286.
  8. Tarwala R, Dorr LD. Robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty using the MAKO platform. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2011; 4:151-6. doi: 10.1007/s12178-011-9086-7.
  9. Zhang S, Liu YB, Ma MY, Cao Z, Kong XP, Chai W. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Severe Acetabular Defect: A Preliminary Exploration and Attempt of Robotic-Assisted Technology. Orthop Surg. 2022; 14:1912-1917. doi: 10.1111/os.13368.
  10. Guo DH, Li XM, Ma SQ, Zhao YC, Qi C, Xue Y. Total Hip Arthroplasty with Robotic Arm Assistance for Precise Cup Positioning: A Case-Control Study. Orthop Surg. 2022; 14:1498-1505. doi: 10.1111/os.13334.
  11. Hadley CJ, Grossman EL, Mont MA, Salem HS, Catani F, Marcovigi A. Robotic-Assisted versus Manually Implanted Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiographic Comparison. Surg Technol Int. 2020; 37:371-376.
  12. Wu XD, Zhou Y, Shao H, Yang D, Guo SJ, Huang W. Robotic-assisted revision total joint arthroplasty: a state-of-the-art scoping review. EFORT Open Rev. 2023; 8:18-25. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0105.
13.              Domb BG, Chen JW, Kyin C, et al. Primary Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 501 Hips with 44-Month Follow-up. Orthopedics. 2021; 44:70-76. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20210201-01.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 250
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 195