Recent Trends and Hotspots in Hip Arthroplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization Study of Last Five-Year Publications | ||
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
مقاله 2، دوره 11، شماره 8، آبان 2023، صفحه 493-501 اصل مقاله (1.16 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: SCOPING REVIEW | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2023.70790.3313 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Mohammad Poursalehian؛ Estatira Javadzade؛ SM Javad Mortazavi* | ||
Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Objectives: Bibliometric analysis is one of the most prevalent methods for analyzing and predicting research trends of particular subjects. Through a bibliometric analysis, the present study sought to look into and depict the hotspots and research trends in hip arthroplasty resear ch over the previous five years. Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection database was used to find studies on hip arthroplasty published between 2018 and 2022. The VOS viewer, Cite Space, and Bibliometrix were used to carry out the bibliometric study and network visualization. Results: During the last five years, 5,708 hip arthroplasty publications were cited 40,765 times. The United States and the Journal of Arthroplasty were the top countries and journals regarding the number of studies, respectively. The top 10 global high-impact documents were determined using the citation ranking and citation burst. The most frequently referenced research revealed the epidemiological aspects of hip arthroplasty, perioperative care after hip arthroplasty, COVID-19, periprosthetic joint infections, opioid medicines, stability, and osteonecrosis were the hot topics in hip arthroplasty research. Keyword burst analysis showed that the research trends in hip arthroplasty through 2022 were patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), depression, racial disparity, and artificial intelligence (AI). The analysis of the subject areas revealed the close connections and relationships between different subject areas, as demonstrated by the figures. Conclusion: The hip arthroplasty research community is very productive and highly centralized. Periprosthetic joint infection, dual-mobility cups, spinopelvic mobility, direct anterior approach, outpatient total hip arthroplasty, polyethylene, periprosthetic fracture, acetabular defects, tranexamic acid, developmental dysplasia of the hip, and safety-net hospitals were recent trends in hip arthroplasty research. Patient-reported outcome measures, depression, racial disparities, and AI were research hotspots in hip arthroplasty. Level of evidence: IV | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Bibliometric analysis؛ Hip arthroplasty؛ Hip replacement؛ Trends؛ Visualization | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Pivec R, Johnson AJ, Mears SC, Mont MA. Hip arthroplasty. Lancet. 2012; 380(9855):1768-1777. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(12)60607-2. 2. Cheppalli, N. S., Metikala, S., Beale, J., Mounsamy, V., & Sambandam, S. (2023). Total Hip Arthroplasty in Cirrhosis is Associated with Increased Complications during the Hospital Stay, Length of Stay, and Cost of Care: A Propensity Matched Database Study. Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 11(5), 330. 3. Pizzo DM, Imam N, Sudah SY, et al. Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health-Supported Relative Citation Ratio among Fellowship-Trained American Orthopaedic Joint Reconstruction Surgery Faculty: A New Bibliometric Measure of Scientific Influence. J Arthroplasty. 2023; 38(1):165-170. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.07.022. 4. Goel, A., Viswanathan, V. K., Purudappa, P. P., Sakthivelnathan, V., Mounasamy, V., & Sambandam, S. (2023). Cost and Early Complication Analysis Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Parkinson’s Disease Patients: A Propensity-matched Database Study. Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 11(1), 47. 5. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021; 133:285-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070. 5. Mansour AM, El Mollayess G, Habib R, Arabi A, Medawar WA. Bibliometric trends in ophthalmology 1997-2009. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015; 63(1):54. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.151471. 7. Schulz CB, Kennedy A, Rymer BC. Trends in ophthalmology journals: a five-year bibliometric analysis (2009- 2013). Int J Ophthalmol. 2016; 9(11):1669. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.11.22. 8. Tan Y, Zhu W, Zou Y, et al. Hotspots and trends in ophthalmology in recent 5 years: Bibliometric analysis in 2017– 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9: 988133. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.988133. 9. Chen C, eds. CiteSpace: A Practical Guide for Mapping Scientific Literature. 2st ed. NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers; 2016. 10. Van Eck N, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics. 2010; 84(2):523-538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3. 11. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics. 2017; 11(4):959-975. 12. Takahashi Y, Utsuro T, Yoshioka M, et al. applying a burst model to detect bursty topics in a topic model. InAdvances in Natural Language Processing: 8th International Conference on NLP, JapTAL 2012, Kanazawa, Japan, October 22-24, 2012. Proceedings 2012 (pp. 239-249). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 13. Li C, Wu H, Sun Z, Chen Z, Trampuz A. Global Publication Trends and Research Hotspots of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A 21-Year Bibliometric Approach. J Arthroplasty. 2022; 37(5):974-984. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.022. 14. Mirghaderi SP, Baghdadi S, Salimi M, Shafiei SH. Scientometric Analysis of the Top 50 Most-Cited Joint Arthroplasty Papers: Traditional vs Altmetric Measures. Arthroplasty Today. 2022; 15:81-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.001. 15. Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100(17):1455-1460. doi:10.2106/jbjs.17.01617. 16. Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL, Jr. Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35(6s):S79-s85. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030. 17. Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, et al. The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(5):1309- 1314.e2. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. 18. Ackerman IN, Bohensky MA, Zomer E, et al. The projected burden of primary total knee and hip replacement for osteoarthritis in Australia to the year 2030. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12891- 019-2411-9. 19. Wainwright TW, Gill M, McDonald DA, et al. Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations. Acta Orthop. 2020; 91(1):3-19. doi:10.1080/17453674.2019.1683790. 20. Hirschmann MT, Hart A, Henckel J, Sadoghi P, Seil R, Mouton C. COVID-19 coronavirus: recommended personal protective equipment for the orthopaedic and trauma surgeon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28(6):1690-1698. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06022-4. 21. Kurtz SM, Lau EC, Son MS, Chang ET, Zimmerli W, Parvizi J. Are We Winning or Losing the Battle With Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Trends in Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Mortality Risk for the Medicare Population. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(10):3238-3245. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.042. 22. Sabatino MJ, Kunkel ST, Ramkumar DB, Keeney BJ, Jevsevar DS. Excess Opioid Medication and Variation in Prescribing Patterns Following Common Orthopaedic Procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100(3):180-188. doi:10.2106/jbjs.17.00672 23. Tezuka T, Heckmann ND, Bodner RJ, Dorr LD. Functional Safe Zone Is Superior to the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Why the Lewinnek Safe Zone Is Not Always Predictive of Stability. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34(1):3-8. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.034. 24. Yoon BH, Mont MA, Koo KH, et al. The 2019 Revised Version of Association Research Circulation Osseous Staging System of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head. J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35(4):933-940. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.029. 25. Darrith B, Courtney PM, Della Valle CJ. Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018; 100-B (1):11-19. doi:10.1302/0301- 620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0462.R1. 26. Lum ZC, Coury JG, Cohen JL, Dorr LD. The Current Knowledge on Spinopelvic Mobility. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(1):291-296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.013. 27. Patel NN, Shah JA, Erens GA. Current Trends in Clinical Practice for the Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019/09/01/ 2019; 34(9):1987- 1993.e3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.025. 28. Shapira J, Chen SL, Rosinsky PJ, Maldonado DR, Lall AC, Domb BG. Outcomes of outpatient total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. HIP Int. 2020; 31(1):4-11. doi: 10.1177/1120700020911639. 29. Prock-Gibbs H, Pumilia CA, Meckmongkol T, Lovejoy J, Mumith A, Coathup M. Incidence of Osteolysis and Aseptic Loosening Following Metal-on-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Studies with Up to 15-Year Follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021; 103(8):728-740. doi:10.2106/jbjs.20.01086. 30. Wang K, Kenanidis E, Miodownik M, Tsiridis E, Moazen M. Periprosthetic fracture fixation of the femur following total hip arthroplasty: A review of biomechanical testing – Part II. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2019; 61:144-162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.12.001 31. Chiarlone F, Zanirato A, Cavagnaro L, Alessio-Mazzola M, Felli L, Burastero G. Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020; 140(3):415-424. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03334-5. 32. Qi Y-m, Wang H-p, Li Y-j, et al. The efficacy and safety of intravenous tranexamic acid in hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Translat. 2019; 19:1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.03.007 33. Wang Y. Current concepts in developmental dysplasia of the hip and total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplasty. 2019; 1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s42836-019-0004-6 34. Sarkovich S, Chapple A, Dasa V, Krause P. Comparison of Premium Technology Utilization in Total Hip Arthroplasty Between Safety-net Hospitals and Non-safety-net Hospitals. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022; 30(21):e1402-e1410. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00376 35. La M, Tangel V, Gupta S, Tedore T, White RS. Hospital safety net burden is associated with increased inpatient mortality and postoperative morbidity after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective multistate review, 2007-2014. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019; doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100305 36. Meadows KA. Patient-reported outcome measures: an overview. British Journal of Community Nursing. 2011; 16(3):146-151. doi:10.12968/bjcn.2011.16.3.146 37. Swarup I, Lee Y-y, Chiu Y-f, Sutherland R, Shields M, Figgie MP. Implant Survival and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(9):2893-2898. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.016 38. Schwartz AM, Wilson JM, Farley KX, Roberson JR, Guild III GN, Bradbury Jr TL. Modifiability of depression’s impact on early revision, narcotic usage, and outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: the impact of psychotherapy. J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35(10):2904-2910. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.021. 39. Zalikha AK, Karabon P, Hajj Hussein I, El-Othmani MM. Anxiety and Depression Impact on Inhospital Complications and Outcomes after Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Weighted Retrospective Analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021; 29(20):873-884. doi: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00721 40. Chun DS, Leonard AK, Enchill Z, Suleiman LI. Racial Disparities in Total Joint Arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021; 14(6):434-440. doi: 10.1007/s12178-021-09718-3 41. Kaul V, Enslin S, Gross SA. History of artificial intelligence in medicine. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 92(4):807-812. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.040 42. Myers TG, Ramkumar PN, Ricciardi BF, Urish KL, Kipper J, Ketonis C. Artificial Intelligence and Orthopaedics: An Introduction for Clinicians. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020; 102(9):830-840. doi:10.2106/JBJS.19.01128 43. Purnomo G, Yeo S-J, Liow MHL. Artificial intelligence in arthroplasty. Arthroplasty. 2021; 3(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s42836-021-00095-3 44. Shi J, Zhu W, Liang S, Li H, Li S. Cross-Linked Versus Conventional Polyethylene for Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis. J Invest Surg. 2021; 34(3):307-317. doi:10.1080/08941939.2019.1606370 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 724 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 697 |