Outcomes of the Pin and Plate Technique in Complex Fractures and Nonunions of Distal Humerus | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 11، شماره 8، آبان 2023، صفحه 503-509 اصل مقاله (870.04 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2023.69446.3268 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mehdi Komijani1؛ Ahmad Shamabadi2؛ Leila Oryadi Zanjani3؛ Mohammad Hossein Nabian4؛ Behnam Panjavi1؛ Reza Shahriar Kamrani* 1 | ||
| 1Department of Orthopedics, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 21 Department of Orthopedics, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2 School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 31 Department of Orthopedics, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 3 Center of Orthopedic Trans-Disciplinary Applied Research (COTAR), School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 41 Department of Orthopedics, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2 School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 3 Center of Orthopedic Trans-Disciplinary Applied Research (COTAR), School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Objectives: This study investigates outcomes and complications of the pin and plate fixation technique, which was suggested for distal humerus fractures. It also reports the results of its application in nonunions for the first time. Methods: Forty-nine fracture and 17 nonunion cases who underwent surgery using the technique and were followed for at least 18 months were assessed through the range of motion (ROM), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score (Quick-DASH), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), four-category verbal rating scale (VRS4), and complications. Results: At the last follow-up, the mean scores of flexion, extension deficit, supination, and pronation ranges in fracture cases were 116.7, 22.9, 90.0, and 90.0 degrees, respectively. These values in nonunion cases were 112.2, 26.4, 86.7, and 85.5 degrees, respectively. The average ROM in fracture cases was 93.8, while it was 85.8 degrees in nonunion cases. The mean Quick-DASH in fracture and nonunion patients were 25.2 and 31.1, respectively. According to the MEPS, 77.5% of fracture and 64.7% of nonunion patients had excellent and good results. In fracture cases, the mean scores of VRS-4 at rest, light activity, and hard activity were 1.3, 1.8, and 2.3, respectively. These values in nonunion cases were 1.8, 2.2, and 2.5, respectively. The most common complications were device prominence and ulnar neuropathy. Conclusion: An acceptable union rate and proper elbow function can be expected by using this technique. Owing to the promising results of this study, further high-quality studies are recommended. Hereby this technique is called Persian Fixation. Level of evidence: IV | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Fracture fixation؛ Humeral fractures؛ Humerus؛ Humerus nonunion؛ Orthopedic fixation devices | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Beazley JC, Baraza N, Jordan R, Modi CS. Suppl-8, M3: Distal Humeral Fractures-Current Concepts. The open orthopaedics journal. 2017; 11:1353. doi: 10.2174/1874325001711011353. 2. Amir S, Jannis S, Daniel R. Distal humerus fractures: a review of current therapy concepts. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016; 9(2):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s12178-016-9341-z. 3. Savvidou OD, Zampeli F, Koutsouradis P, et al. Complications of open reduction and internal fixation of distal humerus fractures. EFORT open reviews. 2018; 3(10):558-567. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180009. 4. O’Driscoll SW. Optimizing stability in distal humeral fracture fixation. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2005; 14(1):S186-S194. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.033. 5. Doornberg JN, Van Duijn PJ, Linzel D, et al. Surgical treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal part of the humerus: functional outcome after twelve to thirty years. JBJS. 2007; 89(7):1524-1532. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00369. 6. Korner J, Lill H, Müller LP, et al. Distal humerus fractures in elderly patients: results after open reduction and internal fixation. Osteoporosis international. 2005; 16(2):S73-S79. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1764-5. 7. Bhashyam AR, Jupiter JB. Revision Fixation of Distal Humerus Fracture Nonunions in Older Age Patients with Poor Bone Quality or Bone Loss–Is This Viable as a Long-term Treatment Option? Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019; 7(3):251. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2018.33009.1872. 8. Fu E, Ring D. Distal humerus nonunion. Shoulder and elbow trauma and its complications. Elsevier; 2016:257-267. 9. LaPorte DM, Murphy MS, Moore JR. Distal humerus nonunion after failed internal fixation: reconstruction with total elbow arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2008; 37(10):531-4. 10. Kamrani RS, Mehrpour SR, Aghamirsalim MR, et al. Pin and plate fixation in complex distal humerus fractures: surgical technique and results. International orthopaedics. 2012; 36(4):839-844. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1343-2. 11. Abdoli A, Farhoud AR, Kamrani RS. Treatment of Distal Humerus Articular Fracture with Pin-and-Plate Technique. The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume). 2020; 25(03):332-339. doi: 10.1142/S242483552050037X. 12. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P. Classification AO des fractures: les os longs. Springer-Verlag; 1987. 13. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. Jun 1996; 29(6):602-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L. 14. Morrey BF, An K, Chao E. Functional evaluation of the elbow. 2000; 5:66-74. 15. Chung T, Prasad K, Lloyd TE. Peripheral neuropathy: clinical and electrophysiological considerations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014; 24(1):49-65. doi:10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.023. 16. Thong ISK, Jensen MP, Miro J, Tan G. The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure? Scand J Pain. Jan 26 2018; 18(1):99-107. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0012. 17. Theivendran K, Duggan PJ, Deshmukh SC. Surgical treatment of complex distal humeral fractures: functional outcome after internal fixation using precontoured anatomic plates. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Jun 2010; 19(4):524-32. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.09.011. 18. Lustenberger T, Leonardy R, Marzi I, Frank J. Outcome after surgical treatment of complex elbow fractures: a singlecenter follow-up study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020; 46(6):1445-1449. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01157-7. 19. Patel J, Motwani G, Shah H, Daveshwar R. Outcome after internal fixation of intraarticular distal humerus (AO type B & C) fractures: Preliminary results with anatomical distal humerus LCP system. J Clin Orthop Trauma. Jan-Mar 2017; 8(1):63-67. doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2017.02.004. 20. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Torchia ME, O'Driscoll SW. Complex distal humeral fractures: internal fixation with a principle-based parallel-plate technique. JBJS. 2007; 89(5):961-969. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01311. 21. Vazquez O, Rutgers M, Ring DC, Walsh M, Egol KA. Fate of the ulnar nerve after operative fixation of distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24(7):395-9. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e3e273. 22. Shearin JW, Chapman TR, Miller A, Ilyas AM. Ulnar Nerve Management with Distal Humerus Fracture Fixation: A MetaAnalysis. Hand Clin. Feb 2018; 34(1):97-103. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2017.09.010. 23. Donders JC, Lorich DG, Helfet DL, Kloen P. Surgical technique: treatment of distal humerus nonunions. HSS Journal®. 2017; 13(3):282-291. doi: 10.1007/s11420-017-9551-y. 24. Allende C, Allende BT. Post-traumatic distal humerus nonunion. International orthopaedics. 2009; 33(5):1289-1294. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0650-8. 25. Cha SM, Shin HD. Open reduction and internal fixation for nonunion of extra-articular distal humeral fractures in patients 70 years and older. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27(1):118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.08.024. 26. Bhashyam AR, Jupiter JB. Revision Fixation of Distal Humerus Fracture Nonunions in Older Age Patients with Poor Bone Quality or Bone Loss - Is This Viable as a Long-term Treatment Option? Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019; 7(3):251-257. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2018.33009.1872. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 609 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 365 |
||
