Amputation Versus Reconstruction in Severe Lower Extremity Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 11، شماره 6، شهریور 2023، صفحه 378-387 اصل مقاله (1.06 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2023.67643.3207 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Freideriki Poutoglidou* 1؛ Rahul Khan2؛ Matija Krkovic1 | ||
| 1Addenbrookes Major Trauma Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK | ||
| 2School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 0SP, UK | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Objectives: Cases of severe lower limb injuries that previously were amenable only to amputation can now, in certain circumstances, be managed with reconstruction. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to compare the results of amputation and reconstruction in severe lower extremity injuries. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL) were comprehensively searched for studies comparing amputation and reconstruction for severe lower extremity injuries. The search terms used were the following: “amputation”, “reconstruction”, “salvage”, “lower limb”, “lower extremity”, and “mangled limb”, “mangled extremity”, “mangled foot”. Two investigators screened eligible studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted the data from each study. Meta-analysis was conducted using the Review Manager Software (RevMan, Version 5.4). The I2 index was used to assess heterogeneity. Results: Fifteen studies with 2,732 patients were included. Amputation is associated with lower rehospitalization rates, lower length of stay in the hospital, lower number of operations and additional surgery and fewer cases of infection and osteomyelitis. Limb reconstruction leads to faster return to work and lower rates of depression. The outcomes with respect to function and pain are variable among the studies. Statistically significance was achieved only with regards to rehospitalization and infection rates. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that amputation yields better outcomes in variables during the early postoperative period, while reconstruction is associated with improved outcomes in certain long-term parameters. Severe lower limb injuries should be managed on their individual merit. The results of this study may be a useful tool to aid in the decision-making for the treating surgeon. High-quality Randomized Controlled Studies are still required to further our conclusions. Level of evidence: III | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Amputation؛ Lower limb injury؛ Mangled؛ Meta-analysis؛ Reconstruction؛ Salvage | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, P. Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336-341. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007. 2. Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016; 355:i4919. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919. 3. Georgiadis GM, Behrens FF, Joyce MJ, Earle AS, Simmons AL. Open tibial fractures with severe soft-tissue loss. Limb salvage compared with below-the-knee amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75:1431-1441. doi:10.2106/00004623- 199310000-00003. 4. Dahl B, Andersson AP, Andersen M, Ebskov LB, Reumert T. Functional and social long-term results after free tissue transfer to the lower extremity. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 34:372- 375. doi:10.1097/00000637-199504000-00005. 5. Hertel R, Strebel N, Ganz R. Amputation versus reconstruction in traumatic defects of the leg: outcome and costs. J Orthop Trauma .1996;10:223-229. doi:10.1097/00005131- 199605000-00001. 6. Dagum AB, Best AK, Schemitsch EH, Mahoney JL, Mahomed MN, Blight KR. Salvage after severe lower-extremity trauma: are the outcomes worth the means? Plast Reconstr Surg, 103(4), 1212-1220. doi:10.1097/00006534-199904040- 00017. 7. Hoogendoorn JM, van der Werken C. Grade III open tibial fractures: functional outcome and quality of life in amputees versus patients with successful reconstruction. Injury. 2001; 32:329-334. doi:10.1016/s0020-1383(00)00250-3. 8. Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ, Kellam JF, et al. An analysis of outcomes of reconstruction or amputation after legthreatening injuries. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1924-1931. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa012604. 9. Higgins TF, Klatt JB, Beals TC. Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP)--the best available evidence on limbthreatening lower extremity trauma. Orthop Clin North Am .2010; 41:233-239. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2009.12.006. 10. Doukas WC, Hayda RA, Frisch HM, et al. The Military Extremity Trauma Amputation/Limb Salvage (METALS) study: outcomes of amputation versus limb salvage following major lower-extremity trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95:138-145. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00734. 11. Ellington JK, Bosse MJ, Castillo RC, MacKenzie EJ, L.S. Group. The mangled foot and ankle: results from a 2-year prospective study. J Orthop Trauma. 2013; 27:43-48. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31825121b6. 12. Melcer T, Sechriest VF, Walker J, Galarneau M. A comparison of health outcomes for combat amputee and limb salvage patients injured in Iraq and Afghanistan wars.J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2013;75(2):S247-54. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318299d95e. 13. Demiralp B, Ege T, Kose O, Yurttas Y, Basbozkurt M. Amputation versus functional reconstruction in the management of complex hind foot injuries caused by landmine explosions: a long-term retrospective comparison. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014; 24:621-626. doi:10.1007/s00590-013-1345-4. 14. Edelstein DA, Florescu I. Crushing injuries of the foot and ankle, with complex open fractures: result of a prospective study with a 3 year follow-up. J Med Life .2016;9:255-258. 15. Ladlow P, Phillip R, Coppack R, et al. Influence of Immediate and Delayed Lower-Limb Amputation Compared with LowerLimb Salvage on Functional and Mental Health Outcomes Post-Rehabilitation in the U.K. Military. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98:1996-2005. doi:10.2106/JBJS.15.01210. 16. Barla M, Gavanier B, Mangin M, Parot J, Bauer C, Mainard D. Is amputation a viable treatment option in lower extremity trauma? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017; 103:971-975. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.022. 17. Fioravanti M, Maman P, Curvale G, Rochwerger AA, Mattei JC. Amputation versus conservative treatment in severe open lower-limb fracture: A functional and quality-of-life study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018; 104:277-281. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2017.12.013. 18. Johansen K, Daines M, Howey T, Helfet D, Hansen Jr ST. Objective criteria accurately predict amputation following lower extremity trauma. J Trauma. 1990; 30:568-572. doi:10.1097/00005373-199005000-00007. 19. Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ, Kellam JF, et al. A prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of the lower-extremity injuryseverity scores. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83:3-14. doi:10.2106/00004623-200101000-00002. 20. Schiro GR, Sessa S, Piccioli A, Maccauro G. Primary amputation vs limb salvage in mangled extremity: a systematic review of the current scoring system. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16:372. doi:10.1186/s12891- 015-0832-7. 21. Loja MN, Sammann A, DuBose J, et al. The mangled extremity score and amputation: Time for a revision. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017; 82:518-523. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001339. 22. Akula M, Gella S, Shaw CJ, McShane P, Mohsen AM. A metaanalysis of amputation versus limb salvage in mangled lower limb injuries--the patient perspective. Injury. 2011; 42:1194- 1197. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2010.05.003. 23. Busse JW, Jacobs CL, Swiontkowski MF, Bosse J, Bhandari M, Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working G. Complex limb salvage or early amputation for severe lower-limb injury: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Orthop Trauma. 2007; 21:70-76. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31802cbc43. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 667 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 592 |
||