Dynamic Rod Constructs as the Preventive Strategy against Adjacent Segment Disease in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disorders: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study | ||
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
مقاله 5، دوره 11، شماره 6، شهریور 2023، صفحه 404-413 اصل مقاله (823.6 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2022.68498.3239 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Sajjad Saghebdoust1؛ Reza Zare1؛ Bipin Chaurasia2؛ Mohammad Moein Vakilzadeh3؛ Omid Yousefi4؛ Mohammad Reza Boustani* 5 | ||
1Department of Neurosurgery, Razavi Hospital, Mashhad, Iran | ||
2Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinic, Birgunj, Nepal | ||
3Cancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
4Trauma Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
5Department of Neurosurgery, Golestan Hospital, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Objectives: Adjacent segment degeneration (ASDe) and adjacent segment disease (ASDi) are potential long-term complications after lumbar fusion with rigid instrumentation. Dynamic fixation techniques (Topping-off) adjacent to the fused segments have been developed to curtail the risk of ASDe and ASDi. The current study sought to investigate whether the addition of dynamic rod constructs (DRC) in patients with preoperative degeneration in the adjacent disc was effective in reducing the risk of ASDi. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data of 207 patients with degenerative lumbar disorders (DLD) from January 2012 to January 2019, who underwent posterior transpedicular lumbar fusion (without Topping-off, NoT/O), and posterior dynamic instrumentation with DRC. Clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and lumbar radiographs one, three, and 12 months postoperatively and annually. ASDe was defined as disc height collapse > 20% and disc wedging > 5. Patients with confirmed ASDe and aggravation of ODI > 20 or VAS score > 5 at final follow-up were diagnosed as ASDi. The Kaplan-Meier hazard method was used to estimate the cumulative probability of ASDi within 63 months of surgery. Results: Over three years of follow-up, 65 patients in the NoT/O (59.6%) and 52 cases (53.1%) in the DRC groups met the diagnostic criteria for ASDe. Furthermore, 27 (24.8%) patients in the NoT/O group showed ASDi during the follow-up, compared to 14 (14.3%) cases in the DRC group (P=0.059). Revision surgery was performed on 19 individuals in the NoT/O and 8 cases in the DRC groups (P=0.048). The Cox regression model identified a significantly decreased risk of ASDi if DRC was used (Hazard ratio: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.13-0.6). Conclusion: Dynamic fixation adjacent to the fused segment is an effective strategy for preventing ASDi in carefully selected individuals with preoperative degenerative changes at the adjacent level. Level of evidence: II | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Adjacent segment disease؛ Degenerative lumbar spinal disorders؛ Dynamic fixation؛ Lumbar instrumentation؛ Rigid fixation | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Sears WR, Solterbeck AC, Kos JA. Risk of adjacent segment disease after ‘topping-off’ multi-level lumbar fusions with posterior dynamic stabilisers: an observational cohort study. Eur Spine J.2021; 30(1):181-190. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020- 06628-9. 2. Lingutla K, Pollock R, Benomran E, et al. Outcome of lumbar spinal fusion surgery in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J.2015; 97-B (10):1395-404. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.35724. 3. Chou P-H, Lin H-H, An HS, Liu K-Y, Su W-R, Lin C-L. Could the Topping-Off Technique Be the Preventive Strategy against Adjacent Segment Disease after Pedicle Screw-Based Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases? A Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:4385620. doi: 10.1155/2017/4385620. 4. Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Adjacent segment disease followinglumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2007; 32(20):2253-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b2d8e. 5. Dobran M, Nasi D, Esposito DP, Gladi M, Scerrati M, Iacoangeli M. The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after the Use of a Versatile Dynamic Hybrid Stabilization Device in Lumbar Stenosis: Results of a 5–8-Year Follow-up. Asian Spine J. 4 2018; 12(2):263-271. doi:10.4184/asj.2018.12.2.263. 6. Fuster S, Martínez-Anda JJ, Castillo-Rivera SA, VargasReverón C, Tornero E. Dynamic Fixation Techniques for the Prevention of Adjacent Segment Disease: A Retrospective Controlled Study. Asian Spine J. 2022; 16(3):401-410. doi:10.31616/asj.2020.0585. 7. Wang T, Ding W. Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion surgery in treatment for degenerative lumbar disorders: a metaanalysis. J Orthop Surg Res.2020; 15(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02032-7. 8. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine. 2004; 29(17):1938-1944. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03. 9. Chen B-L, Wei F-X, Ueyama K, Xie D-H, Sannohe A, Liu S-Y. Adjacent segment degeneration after single-segment PLIF: the risk factor for degeneration and its impact on clinical outcomes. Eur Spine J.2011; 20(11):1946-50. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1888-1. 10. Okuda S, Oda T, Miyauchi A, et al. Lamina horizontalization and facet tropism as the risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF. Spine .2008; 33(25):2754-2758. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817bb9c2. 11. Khoueir P, Kim KA, Wang MY. Classification of posterior dynamic stabilization devices. Neurosurg Focus.2007; 22(1):E3. doi: 10.3171/foc.2007.22.1.3. 12. Baioni A, Di Silvestre M, Greggi T, Vommaro F, Lolli F, Scarale A. Does hybrid fixation prevent junctional disease after posterior fusion for degenerative lumbar disorders? A minimum 5-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J.2015; 24 Suppl 7:855-64. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4269-3. 13. Maserati MB, Tormenti MJ, Panczykowski DM, Bonfield CM, Gerszten PC. The use of a hybrid dynamic stabilization and fusion system in the lumbar spine: preliminary experience. Neurosurg Focus.2010; 28(6):E2. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1055. 14. Putzier M, Hoff E, Tohtz S, Gross C, Perka C, Strube P. Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part II. No clinical benefit for asymptomatic, initially degenerated adjacent segments after 6 years follow-up. Eur Spine J.2010; 19(12):2181-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1517-4. 15. Lee C-H, Jahng T-A, Hyun S-J, et al. Dynamic stabilization using the Dynesys system versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disease: a clinical and radiological outcomes-based metaanalysis. Neurosurg Focus.2016; 40(1):E7. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15426. 16. Wang H, Chow SC. Sample size calculation for comparing proportions. Wiley Encyclopedia of Clinical Trials. 2007 Dec 14; 10:9781118445112. 17. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2001; 26(17):1873- 8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011. 18. Liang J, Dong Y, Zhao H. Risk factors for predicting symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration requiring surgery in patients after posterior lumbar fusion. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014; 9:97. doi:10.1186/s13018-014-0097-0 19. Kim DY, Lee SH, Lee HY, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30(5):E123 doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000157172.00635.3a 20. Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, et al. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) .2011; 36(21 Suppl):S54-68. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef74d 21. Froud R, Patel S, Rajendran D, et al. A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Use, Analytical Approaches, Reporting Methods, and Publication Volume by Year in Low Back Pain Trials Published between 1980 and 2012: Respice, adspice, et prospice. PLoS One 2016; 11(10):e0164573. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164573 22. Alentado VJ, Lubelski D, Healy AT, et al. Predisposing characteristics of adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2016; 41(14):1167-1172. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001493. 23. Bydon M, Xu R, Santiago-Dieppa D, et al. Adjacent-segment disease in 511 cases of posterolateral instrumented lumbar arthrodesis: floating fusion versus distal construct including the sacrum. J Neurosurg Spine.2014; 20(4):380-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.12.SPINE13789. 24. Norvell DC, Dettori JR, Skelly AC, Riew KD, Chapman JR, Anderson PA. Methodology for the systematic reviews on an adjacent segment pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2012; 37(22 Suppl):S10-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826cd9c8 25. Kaito T, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Makino T, Fuji T, Yonenobu K. Induction of early degeneration of the adjacent segment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion by excessive distraction of lumbar disc space. J Neurosurg Spine.2010; 12(6):671-9. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.SPINE08823. 26. Helgeson MD, Bevevino AJ, Hilibrand AS. Update on the evidence for adjacent segment degeneration and disease. Spine J.2013; 13(3):342-51. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.12.009. 27. Spallone A. A less-invasive technique for harvesting autologous iliac crest grafts for cervical interbody fusion. Surg Neurol.2007; 67(2):160-2; discussion 162. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.07.012. 28. Sasso R, Garrido B. Journal of spinal disorders & techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20(2):118-122. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211263.13250.b1. 29. Zhu Z, Liu C, Wang K, et al. Topping-off technique prevents aggravation of degeneration of adjacent segment fusion revealed by retrospective and finite element biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Surg Res.2015; 10:10. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0142-z. 30. Kashkoush A, Agarwal N, Paschel E, Goldschmidt E, Gerszten PC. Evaluation of a hybrid dynamic stabilization and fusion system in the lumbar spine: a 10 year experience. Cureus.2016; 8(6):e637. doi: 10.7759/cureus.637. 31. Beastall J, Karadimas E, Siddiqui M, et al. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2007; 32(6):685-90. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000257578.44134.fb. 32. Cabello J, Cavanilles-Walker J, Iborra M, Ubierna M, Covaro A, Roca J. The protective role of dynamic stabilization on the adjacent disc to a rigid instrumented level. An in vitro biomechanical analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.2013; 133(4):443-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1685-x. 33. Herren C, Sobottke R, Pishnamaz M, et al. The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome-and radiological-based prospective clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018; 19(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2103-x. 34. Chen X-L, Guan L, Liu Y-Z, Yang J-C, Wang W-L, Hai Y. Interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to fusion versus double-segment fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disease with a minimum follow-up of three years. Int Orthop.2016; 40(6):1275-83. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016- 3199-y. 35. Pan A, Hai Y, Yang J, Zhou L, Chen X, Guo H. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion compared with motion-preservation procedures: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J.2016; 25(5):1522-1532. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4415-6. 36. Wang W, Sun X, Zhang T, Sun S, Kong C, Lu S. Topping-off technology versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int.2020; 2020:2953128. doi: 10.1155/2020/2953128. 37. Roitberg B, Zileli M, Sharif S, Anania C, Fornari M, Costa F. Mobility-Preserving Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations. World Neurosurg X.2020; 7:100078. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2020.100078. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 384 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 324 |