سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

Ghazanfarpour, Masumeh. (1401). Psychometric Properties of the Attitude toward Menopause Checklist-Persian Version: A Comparison between Girls’ and their Menopause Mothers’ Attitudes. , 11(1), 17333-17345. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2021.52983.4194
Masumeh Ghazanfarpour. "Psychometric Properties of the Attitude toward Menopause Checklist-Persian Version: A Comparison between Girls’ and their Menopause Mothers’ Attitudes". , 11, 1, 1401, 17333-17345. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2021.52983.4194
Ghazanfarpour, Masumeh. (1401). 'Psychometric Properties of the Attitude toward Menopause Checklist-Persian Version: A Comparison between Girls’ and their Menopause Mothers’ Attitudes', , 11(1), pp. 17333-17345. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2021.52983.4194
Ghazanfarpour, Masumeh. Psychometric Properties of the Attitude toward Menopause Checklist-Persian Version: A Comparison between Girls’ and their Menopause Mothers’ Attitudes. , 1401; 11(1): 17333-17345. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2021.52983.4194

Psychometric Properties of the Attitude toward Menopause Checklist-Persian Version: A Comparison between Girls’ and their Menopause Mothers’ Attitudes

Journal of Pediatric Perspectives
مقاله 14، دوره 11، شماره 1، فروردین 2023، صفحه 17333-17345    اصل مقاله (332.54 K)
نوع مقاله: original article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/ijp.2021.52983.4194
نویسنده
Masumeh Ghazanfarpour*
Student Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
چکیده
Background: The current study was conducted to examine the psychometric properties, including internal consistency, content validity, construct validity of the scale through which the attitude of girls and menopause women were compared.
Methods: This is a psychometric study on 350 healthy postmenopausal Iranian women referred to healthcare centers in Semnan and Mashhad cities. The study is conducted in two phases: revalidating the scale of Attitude toward Menopause (ATM) in the Iranian context and then comparing the attitudes of girls and menopause women. Due to the special circumstances caused by the Corona crisis and the lack of direct access to girls, as well as the limited research time, a number of ATM questionnaires were completed online and some in person by 200 postmenopausal women and 200 adolescent girls.
Results: Mean age of subjects were 55.45±5.58 years. Cronbach's alpha was 0.68% and original modified model was reported to be unidentified. Therefore, the exploratory factor analysis was performed through principal-component analysis with varimax rotation. Given the results of scree plot, eigenvalues and the interpretability of the different factor solutions, five factors were identified as the most appropriate predictors of attitude toward menopause. These five factors explained 48% of variance. In the second phase of the study, 200 postmenopausal women and 200 girls participated. The mean score of attitude of postmenopausal women was 45.67 66 5.66 and the mean score of attitude of girls was 48.75 74 5.74; and the difference between the mean scores was found to be statistically significant (00 0.001). The correlation coefficient between age and attitude score was equal to (r = -0.228, P˂0.001). In other words, for each year of increasing the age of the participants, their attitude score was reduced by 0.228 and this decrease was significant.
Conclusions: Our findings revealed that attitude toward menopause Checklist (ATM) should be modified in accordance with Iranian culture to predispose for feasible assessment of attitudes towards menopause. Further investigations are needed to evaluate all of the psychometric properties of this scale. The findings of the second part of the study showed that the attitude of adolescent girls is significantly more positive than postmenopausal women.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Keyword: Psychometric properties؛ attitude toward menopause؛ girl؛ menopause
مراجع
  1. Ghorbani R, Nassaji M, Shahbazi A, Tabar SB, Rahaei F. Attitudes toward menopause among middle-aged women in Semnan, Iran. The Journal Of The Egyptian Public Health Association. 2014;89 (1): 42-5.
  2. Jamshidi Manesh M, Jouybary L, Peyrovi H, Sanagoo A. The ups and downs of sex life in menopausal stage: a qualitative study. Qom University of Medical Sciences Journal. 2009; 3 (2): 41-6.
  3. Neugarten BL, Wood V, Kraines RJ, Loomis B. Women’s attitudes toward the menopause. Human Development. 1963; 6(3): 140-51.
  4. Avis NE, McKinlay SM. A longitudinal analysis of women's attitudes toward the menopause: results from the Massachusetts Women's Health Study. Maturitas. 1991; 13(1): 65-79.
  5. Cheng M-H, Wang S-J, Wang P-H, Fuh J-L. Attitudes toward menopause among middle-aged women: a community survey in an island of Taiwan. Maturitas. 2005; 52(3): 348-55.
  6. Khademi S, Cooke M. Comparing the attitudes of urban and rural Iranian women toward menopause. Maturitas. 2003; 46(2): 113-21.
  7. Bowles C. Measure of attitude toward menopause using the semantic differential model. Nursing Research. 1986; 35(2): 81-5.
  8. Huffman SB, Myers JE, Tingle LR, Bond LA. Menopause symptoms and attitudes of African American women: Closing the knowledge gap and expanding opportunities for counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development. 2005; 83(1): 48-56.
  9. Ghaderi E, Ghazanfarpour M, Kaviani M. Evaluation of menopausal women's attitudes towards menopause in Shiraz. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2010; 26(3).
  10. Jassim GA, Al-Shboul Q. Attitudes of Bahraini women towards the menopause: implications for health care policy. Maturitas. 2008; 59(4): 358-72.
  11. Aksu H, Sevinçok L, Kücük M, Sezer S, Ogurlu N. The attitudes of menopausal women and their spouses towards menopause. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2011; 38(3): 251.
  12. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000; 25(24): 3186-91.
  13. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology. 1975; 28(4): 563-75.
  14. Waltz CF, Bausell BR. Nursing research: design statistics and computer analysis: Davis FA; 1981.
  15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. Bmj. 1997; 314(7080): 572.
  16. Hu Lt, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal. 1999; 6(1): 1-55.
  17. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming: Routledge; 2013.
  18. Hagger MS, Orbell S. A confirmatory factor analysis of the revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R) in a cervical screening context. Psychology & Health. 2005; 20(2): 161-73.
  19. Marsh HW, Hocevar D. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological bulletin. 1985; 97(3): 562.
  20. Little TD, Lindenberger U, Nesselroade JR. On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When" good" indicators are bad and" bad" indicators are good. Psychological Methods. 1999; 4(2): 192.
  21. King PAL. Replicability of structural models of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a community sample of postpartum African American women with low socioeconomic status. Archives of women's mental health. 2012; 15(2): 77-86.
  22. Sanagou A, Jouybari L. A phenomenological study of Turkmen women's in menopause experience. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2013; 15(35): 1-10.
  23. Hakimi S, Simbar M, Ramezani Tf. Concerns of Menopausal Women: a Phenomenological Study in North West Iran. 2014.
  24. Rimaz S, Zareie F, Shamsalizadeh N. Iranian women's understandings of menopause and cultural scenarios. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2013; 11(1): 1-16.
  25. Kazemian S, Abbasian ZS. experience of menopausal women in dealing with menopause: A qualitative study. 2016.
  26. van Doorn-Klomberg AL, Braspenning JC, Feskens RC, Bouma M, Campbell SM, Reeves D. Precision of individual and composite performance scores: the ideal number of indicators in an indicator set. Medical care. 2013: 115-21.
  27. Faraji R, Asgharnia M, Hosseinzadeh F, Emadi A. Attitude and knowledge of women about menopause and hormone replacement therapy. Journal of Holistic Nursing And Midwifery. 2014; 24(1): 48-55.
  28. Erbil N, Gümüşay M. Relationship Between Perceived Social Support and Attitudes Towards Menopause among Women and Affecting Factors. Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science. 2018; 4(2): 7-18.
  29. Kısa S, Zeyneloğlu S, Ozdemir N. Examination of midlife women's attitudes toward menopause in Turkey. Nursing & health sciences. 2012; 14(2): 148-55.
  30. Tortumluoğlu G, Erci B. The impact of the attitude and health behaviors of the climacteric women on the menopausal symptoms. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences. 2003; 6: 77-90.
  31. Standing TS, Glazer G. Attitudes of low‐income clinic patients toward menopause. Health Care for Women International. 1992; 13(3): 271-80.
  32. Cheng M-H, Wang S-J, Wang P-H, Fuh J-L. Attitudes toward menopause among middle-aged women: a community survey in an island of Taiwan. Maturitas. 2005; 52(3-4): 348-55.
  33. Nusrat N, Nishat Z, Gulfareen H, Aftab M, Asia N. Knowledge, attitude and experience of menopause. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008; 20(1): 56-9.
  34. Avis NE, Crawford S. Cultural differences in symptoms and attitudes toward menopause. Menopause Management. 2008; 17(3): 8.
  35. L S. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility: Translated by B: Ghazijahani. Golban medical publication; 2012.
  36. Eslamimehr F, Rakhshani F, Ramezankhani A, Khodakarim S. Assessment of an educational intervention effectiveness on promoting menstrual knowledge and related health behaviors in female high school students in Khamir city in 2015-2016. Journal of Health in the Field. 2017; 5(1).
  37. Unicef. The State of the World’s Children 2011: Adolescence: an age of opportunity. 2011. New York: Unicef. 2020.
  38. Gebretatyos H, Ghirmai L, Amanuel S, Gebreyohannes G, Tsighe Z, Tesfamariam EH. Effect of health education on knowledge and attitude of menopause among middle-age teachers. BMC Women's Health. 2020; 20(1): 1-10.
  39. Erbil N, Boyacı S, Kurt İ, Akdoğan Y, Kaya İ. A Turkish study on menarche and menstrual experiences and their effects on attitudes towards menopause. International journal of nursing practice. 2012; 18(2): 107-16.
  40. Nosek M, Kennedy HP, Beyene Y, Taylor D, Gilliss C, Lee K. The effects of perceived stress and attitudes toward menopause and aging on symptoms of menopause. Journal of midwifery & women's health. 2010; 55(4): 328-34.
  41. Ataei-Almanghadim K, Farshbaf-Khalili A, Ostadrahimi AR, Shaseb E, Mirghafourvand M. The effect of oral capsule of curcumin and vitamin E on the hot flashes and anxiety in postmenopausal women: a triple blind randomised controlled trial. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2020; 48: 102267.
  42. Yazdizadeh V, Modares GM, Kazemnejad A. The effect of fluoxetin on hot flashes in menopaused women. 2009.
  43. Johnston-Robledo I, Ball M, Lauta K, Zekoll A. To bleed or not to bleed: Young women's attitudes toward menstrual suppression. Women & Health. 2003; 38(3): 59-75.
  44. DiMattia KM. The Care and Keeping of You: A Workshop on Young Women’s Attitudes Towards Their Bodies: Indiana University of Pennsylvania; 2019.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 292
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 449