Impact of Age on Functional Outcome after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Performed for Proximal Humerus Fractures or Their Sequelae | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 11، شماره 1، فروردین 2023، صفحه 29-38 اصل مقاله (523.89 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2022.56366.2798 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Derek S Stenquist* 1؛ James Barger1؛ Amin Mohamadi2؛ Michael J. Weaver3؛ Nishant Suneja4؛ George S.M. Dyer5؛ Arvind Von Keudell6 | ||
| 1Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, USA | ||
| 2Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, USA | ||
| 3Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, USA | ||
| 4Orthopaedic Trauma Service, SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn, New York, USA | ||
| 5Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, MA, USA | ||
| 6Orthopaedic Geriatric Trauma Surgery and Research, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, MA, USA | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to treat displaced, unstable 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) has traditionally been reserved for patients over 70 years old. However, recent data suggest that nearly one third of all patients treated with RSA for PHF are between 55-69 years old. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes for patients younger than 70 versus patients older than 70 years of age treated with RSA for a PHF or fracture sequelae. Methods: All patients who underwent primary RSA for acute PHF or fracture sequelae (nonunion, malunion) between 2004 and 2016 were identified. A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing outcomes for patients younger than 70 versus patients older than 70. Bivariate and survival analyses were performed to evaluate for differences in complications, functional outcomes, and implant survival. Results: A total of 115 patients were identified, including 39 patients in the young group and 76 patients in the older group. 40 patients (43.5%) returned functional outcomes surveys at an average of 5.51 years (range 3.04-11.0). There were no significant differences in complications, reoperation, implant survival, range of motion, DASH (27.9 vs 23.8, p=0.46), PROMIS (43.3 vs 43.6, p=0.93), or EQ5D (0.75 vs 0.80, p=0.36) scores between the two age cohorts. Conclusion: At a minimum of 3 years after RSA for a complex PHF or fracture sequelae, we found no significant difference in complications, reoperation rates, or functional outcomes between younger patients with an average age of 64 years and older patients with an average age of 78 years. To our knowledge, this is the first study to specifically examine the impact of age on outcome after RSA for the treatment of a proximal humerus fracture. These findings indicate that functional outcomes are acceptable to patients younger than 70 in the short term, but more studies are needed. Patients should be counseled that the long-term durability of RSA performed for fracture in young, active patients remains unknown. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Arthroplasty؛ Shoulder Fracture؛ Age؛ Outcome؛ Function | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):691–7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. 2. Kim SH, Szabo RM, Marder RA. Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample, 2008. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(3):407–14. doi: 10.1002/ acr.21563. 3. Gupta AK, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, et al. Surgical management of complex proximal humerus fractures-a systematic review of 92 studies including 4500 patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(1):54–9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000229. 4. Hhg H, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults ( Review ) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR THE MAIN COMPARISON. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(11):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub4. 5. Rangan A, Handoll H, Brealey S, et al. Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(10):1037– 47. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1629. 6. Orman S, Mohamadi A, Serino J, et al. Comparison of surgical and non-surgical treatments for 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: A network metaanalysis. Shoulder Elbow. 2020;12(2):99–108. doi: 10.1177/1758573219831506. 7. Longo UG, Petrillo S, Berton A, Denaro V. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the management of fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg. 2016;100(2):83-91. doi: 10.1007/s12306-016-0409-0. 8. Spross C, Meester J, Mazzucchelli RA, Puskás GJ, Zdravkovic V, Jost B. Evidence-based algorithm to treat patients with proximal humerus fractures—a prospective study with early clinical and overall performance results. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2019;28(6):1022–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.02.015. 9. Fraser AN, Bjørdal J, Wagle TM, et al. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Superior to Plate Fixation at 2 Years for Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(6):477–85. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01071. 10.Acevedo DC, Vanbeek C, Lazarus MD, Williams GR, Abboud JA. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: update on indications, technique, and results. J shoulder Elb Surg.2014;23(2):279–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.10.003. 11.Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am.2011;93(24):2249–54. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01994. 12.Acevedo DC, Mann T, Abboud JA, Getz C, Baumhauer JF, Voloshin I. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures: patterns of use among newly trained orthopedic surgeons. J shoulder Elb Surg.2014;23(9):1363–7. doi: 10.1016/j. jse.2014.01.005. 13.Palsis JA, Simpson KN, Matthews JH, Traven S, Eichinger JK, Friedman RJ. Current Trends in the Use of Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States. Orthopedics. 2018;41(3):e416–23. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180409-05. 14.Dillon MT, Prentice HA, Burfeind WE, Chan PH, Navarro RA. The increasing role of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Injury. 2019;50(3):676–80. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.034. 15.Grubhofer F, Wieser K, Meyer DC, et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute head-splitting, 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. J shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25(10):1690–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.024. 16.Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L. Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res.2009;95(1):48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2008.09.002. 17.Klein M, Juschka M, Hinkenjann B, Scherger B, Ostermann PAW. Treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients with the Delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(10):698-704. doi: 10.1097/ BOT.0b013e31818afe40. 18.Ek ETH, Neukom L, Catanzaro S, Gerber C. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 65 years old: results after five to fifteen years. J shoulder Elb Surg.2013;22(9):1199–208. doi: 10.1016/j. jse.2012.11.016. 19.Chalmers PN, Slikker W, Mall NA, et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fracture: comparison to open reduction-internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty. J shoulder Elb Surg.2014;23(2):197–204doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013. 07.044.. 20.Jobin CM, Galdi B, Anakwenze OA, Ahmad CS, Levine WN. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the management of proximal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg.2015;23(3):190–201. doi: 10.5435/ JAAOS-D-13-00190. 21.Von Keudell A, Sodha S, Collins J, Minas T, Fitz W, Gomoll AH. Patient satisfaction after primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an agedependent analysis. Knee.2014;21(1):180–4. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.08.004. 22.Anakwenze OA, Zoller S, Ahmad CS, Levine WN. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review. J shoulder Elb Surg.2014;23(4):e73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jse. 2013.09.012. 23.Gallinet D, Cazeneuve JF, Boyer E, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for recent proximal humerus fractures: Outcomes in 422 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(5):805–11. doi: 10.1016/j. otsr.2019.03.019. 24.Namdari S, Horneff JG, Baldwin K. Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(18):1701–8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01115. 25.Ferrel JR, Trinh TQ, Fischer RA. Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Systematic Review. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(1):60-8. doi: 10.1097/ BOT.0000000000000224. 26.Dezfuli B, King JJ, Farmer KW, Struk AM, Wright TW. Outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as primary versus revision procedure for proximal humerus fractures. J shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25(7):1133–7doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.002.. 27.Gallinet D, Adam A, Gasse N, Rochet S, Obert L. Improvement in shoulder rotation in complex shoulder fractures treated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J shoulder Elb Surg.2013;22(1):38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.011. 28.Mata-Fink A, Meinke M, Jones C, Kim B, Bell JE. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older adults: A systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg.2013;22(12):1737–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.021. 29.Rotman D, Giladi O, Senderey AB, et al. Mortality After Complex Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly Patients: Conservative Versus Operative Treatment With Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil.2018;9:2151459318795241. doi: 10.1177/2151459318795241. 30.Torchia MT, Austin DC, Cozzolino N, Jacobowitz L, Bell J-E. Acute versus delayed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J shoulder Elb Surg.2019;28(4):765–73. doi: 10.1016/j. jse.2018.10.004. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 481 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 397 |
||