سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

متصدی زرندی, سعید, نصیری, رسول, احمدی, مهتاب. (1401). ارزیابی اثرات زیست محیطی توسعه سیستم حمل و نقل عمومی برقی در شهر تهران. , 8(2), 193-210. doi: 10.22038/jreh.2022.63008.1474
سعید متصدی زرندی; رسول نصیری; مهتاب احمدی. "ارزیابی اثرات زیست محیطی توسعه سیستم حمل و نقل عمومی برقی در شهر تهران". , 8, 2, 1401, 193-210. doi: 10.22038/jreh.2022.63008.1474
متصدی زرندی, سعید, نصیری, رسول, احمدی, مهتاب. (1401). 'ارزیابی اثرات زیست محیطی توسعه سیستم حمل و نقل عمومی برقی در شهر تهران', , 8(2), pp. 193-210. doi: 10.22038/jreh.2022.63008.1474
متصدی زرندی, سعید, نصیری, رسول, احمدی, مهتاب. ارزیابی اثرات زیست محیطی توسعه سیستم حمل و نقل عمومی برقی در شهر تهران. , 1401; 8(2): 193-210. doi: 10.22038/jreh.2022.63008.1474

ارزیابی اثرات زیست محیطی توسعه سیستم حمل و نقل عمومی برقی در شهر تهران

مجله پژوهش در بهداشت محیط
مقاله 8، دوره 8، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 30، مرداد 1401، صفحه 193-210    اصل مقاله (572.21 K)
نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/jreh.2022.63008.1474
نویسندگان
سعید متصدی زرندی1؛ رسول نصیری2؛ مهتاب احمدی* 2
1گروه بهداشت محیط، دانشکده بهداشت و ایمنی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
2گروه بهداشت محیط، دانشکده بهداشت و ایمنی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
زمینه و هدف : پایداری محیط زیست یک الزام برای سیستم های حمل و نقل شهری مدرن است. انتخاب گزینه ی مناسب حمل و نقل عمـومی در هر سیستم شهری نه تنها منجر به توسعه ی پایدار حمـل و نقل شهری میگردد، بلکه همچنین فرآینـد برنامـه ریزی را با خصوصیات افراد آن جامعه تطبیـق داده و ســبب تشــویق افــراد بــه اســتفاده از آن و در نتیجــه افزایش بهره وری آن می گردد. از این رو هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر ارزیابی اثرات زیست محیطی توسعه سیستم حمل و نقل عمومی برقی در شهر تهران می باشد.
مواد و روش ها: در این مطالعه پس از اخذ داده های مستند و منتشر شده شامل (کتب ، مقالات حمل و نقلی و اخذ آمارهای حمل و نقل شهر تهران از شرکت های اتوبوس رانی و سازمان حمل و نقل و ترافیک شهرداری)، از روش AHP-TOPSSIS برای انتخاب بهترین گزینه جهت توسعه حمل و نقل عمومی در شهر تهران بهره گرفته شده است.
یافته ها: نتایج نشان داد که گزینه اجرای سیستم حمل و نقل برقی با سرمایه گزاری بخش خصوصی و اعطای تسهیلات دولتی (0.5798)، استفاده از سیستم حمل و نقل برقی در هسته مرکزی شهر (0.3972)، تبدیل BRT ها به برقی (0.2886) و گزینه عدم اجرا (0.2672) به ترتیب بالاترین و پایین ترین اولویت را در بین روش های توسعه سیستم حمل و نقل عمومی برقی شهر تهران داشته اند.
نتیجه گیری: برای نیل به هدف حذف استفاده از سوخت های فسیلی در آینده ای نه چندان دور برای جلوگیری از تغییرات آب و هوایی و حذف آلودگی های محیطی حاصل از سوخت های فسیلی، سیستم حمل و نقل شهری تهران باید در جهت حذف سوخت های فسیلی، توسعه و تبدیل ناوگان خود به سیستم های برقی روی آورد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
کلمات کلیدی: ارزیابی اثرات زیست محیطی؛ حمل و نقل عمومی برقی؛ AHP-TOPSIS؛ تهران
مراجع
  1.  Mikulčić H, Duić N, Dewil R. Environmental management as a pillar for sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017;203:867-71.
  2.  Mottaghi A GA, Mohammadi Z. Analysis of the role of local governments in sustainable urban development (case study; Iranian cities. Journal of New Attitudes in Human Geography. 2019;11(4):349-25.
  3. Muñoz-Villamizar A, Santos J, Montoya-Torres JR, Velázquez-Martínez JC. Measuring environmental performance of urban freight transport systems: A case study. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2020;52:101844.
  4. Raza SA, Shah N, Sharif A. Time frequency relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and environmental degradation in the United States: Evidence from transportation sector. Energy. 2019;173:706-20.
  5.  Abas AP, Yong J, Mahlia TMI, Hannan M. Techno-economic analysis and environmental impact of electric vehicle. IEEE Access. 2019;7:98565-78.
  6.  Fattah A, Morshed SR. Assessing the sustainability of transportation system in a developing city through estimating CO2 emissions and bio-capacity for vehicular activities. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2021;10:100361.
  7. Gallet M, Massier T, Hamacher T. Estimation of the energy demand of electric buses based on real-world data for large-scale public transport networks. Applied Energy. 2018;230:344-56.
  8.  Danaie H GF. examining the effect of users ' perceptions and satisfaction of the public transport system on their loyalty ( studied : region 11 tehran ). New Applied Studies in Management,Economics and Accounting. 2019;16.
  9. Hrelja R, Khan J, Pettersson F. How to create efficient public transport systems? A systematic review of critical problems and approaches for addressing the problems. Transport Policy. 2019.
  10. 10. A M. Modeling and Evaluation of Factors Affecting Public Transportation System User Satisfaction (Case Study: Tehran Metro and BRT). Journal of Road Science. 2021;17.
  11. 11. Holmberg K, Erdemir A. The impact of tribology on energy use and CO2 emission globally and in combustion engine and electric cars. Tribology International. 2019;135:389-96.
  12. 12. Lemonde C, Arsenio E, Henriques R. Public transportation multimodality in the City of Lisbon. Transportation research procedia. 2021;58:75-82.
  13. 13. Desta M, Lee T, Wu H. Life cycle energy consumption and environmental assessment for utilizing biofuels in the development of a sustainable transportation system in Ethiopia. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 2022;13:100144.
  14. 14. Illgen S, Höck M. Electric vehicles in car sharing networks – Challenges and simulation model analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2018;63:377-87.
  15. Lemme RFF, Arruda EF, Bahiense L. Optimization model to assess electric vehicles as an alternative for fleet composition in station-based car sharing systems. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2019;67:173-96.
  16. Li Y, Zhong Z, Zhang K, Zheng T. A car-following model for electric vehicle traffic flow based on optimal energy consumption. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2019;533:122022.
  17. Xylia M, Silveira S. The role of charging technologies in upscaling the use of electric buses in public transport: Experiences from demonstration projects. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2018;118:399-415.
  18. Ahmadi P. Environmental impacts and behavioral drivers of deep decarbonization for transportation through electric vehicles. Journal of cleaner production. 2019;225:1209-19.
  19. Gabsalikhova L, Sadygova G, Almetova Z. Activities to convert the public transport fleet to electric buses. Transportation Research Procedia. 2018;36:669-75.
  20. Shirazi H. Review of Public Transportation Policies in Tehran, Necessity of an Integrated Policy Package. Strategic Studies of public policy. 2020;10(37):336-58.
  21. Fallah E. Investigating barriers and problems facing sustainable transportation in Tehran. Conference on Sustainable Urban Development; University of Tehran2011.
  22. Gheitasi Vand F SF, Hoseinpour D. designing a general policy framework with a network governance approach ; study : public transport in tehran. Public policy. 2021;6:89-113.
  23. Conti V, Orchi S, Valentini MP, Nigro M, Calò R. Design and evaluation of electric solutions for public transport. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017;27:117-24.
  24. Zhang X, Nie S, He M, Wang J. Charging system analysis, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions of battery electric buses in Beijing. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2021;26:101197.
  25. Hosseini S, Sarder MD. Development of a Bayesian network model for optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2019;105:110-22.
  26. Jabari E SS. A new method for solving public transportation problem using linear programming and combined PS-ACO metaheuristic algorithm. Transportation Engineering. 2017;20.
  27. E{Esmaeili Alavijeh sA, Elham, Karimi S, Alavipoor F. Vulnerability Assessment in Urban Areas against Flood with Fuzzy Logic (case study: Tehran District 22). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2020;22(3):349-61.
  28. Organization TMIaCT. TehranStatisticalYearBook-98. 2018;474.
  29. Gharehbakhsh H, Mollaei M, Taghavi L. Interactions of Tehran Urban Management Indices and Environmental Performance Indices (EPI). Human & Environment. 2020;18(1):35-48.
  30. Faridi S, Niazi S, Yousefian F, Azimi F, Pasalari H, Momeniha F, et al. Spatial homogeneity and heterogeneity of ambient air pollutants in Tehran. Science of The Total Environment. 2019;697:134123.
  31. Jafari AJ, Delikhoon M, Rastani MJ, Baghani AN, Sorooshian A, Rohani-Rasaf M, et al. Characteristics of gaseous and particulate air pollutants at four different urban hotspots in Tehran, Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021;70:102907.
  32. MOTESADDI ZS, Nasiri R. Spatio-temporal Analysis of PM2. 5 Pollutant in Tehran Metropolis During the Years 2014-2017. 2020.
  33. Duarte CG, Sánchez LE. Addressing significant impacts coherently in environmental impact statements. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2020;82:106373.
  34. Mareddy AR. Conceptual facets of EIA. In: Mareddy AR, editor. Environmental Impact Assessment: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2017. p. 1-29.
  35. Nouri J, Nourbakhsh Z, Nourbakhsh M, Tahmasbpour A, editors. Managing Environmental Aspects and Impacts of Pulp and Paper Industries using Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ).
  36. Omidvari M, Ghandehari M. A pattern of Environmental System Assessment in Urban Management by AHP Method. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2019;21(7):207-19.
  37. Samari Jahromi H, Hossein Zade Asl H. Comparing and ranking methods for monitoring NO2 in the air by using Analytical Hierarchy Process Model. Human & Environment. 2012;10(22):17-26.
  38. Azar A MA. AHP is a new technique for group decision making. Management Knowledge Quarterly. 1373;11.
  39. Mehri A, Salmanmahiny A. A review of rural land use planning models. Human & Environment. 2017;15(1):71-92.
  40. Feyzi A, Hashemi T, Hashemi A. The Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Model for Performance Evaluation of Employees in Environmental Offices. Human & Environment. 2017;15(3):13-30.
  41. Amini S. The combined method of AHP and TOPSIS: Sanaye20.ir; 2021 [
  42. Wu YA, Ng AW, Yu Z, Huang J, Meng K, Dong ZY. A review of evolutionary policy incentives for sustainable development of electric vehicles in China: Strategic implications. Energy Policy. 2021;148:111983.
  43. Hoseini T MM. Unpolluted urban logistics;Use of electric vehicles in the distribution chain and distribution of goods and urban traffic. Scientific Quarterly of Traffic Management Studies. 1395(41):91-114.
  44. Rasti-Barzoki M, Moon I. A game theoretic approach for analyzing electric and gasoline-based vehicles’ competition in a supply chain under government sustainable strategies: A case study of South Korea. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021;146:111139.
  45. Mohamed M, Ferguson M, Kanaroglou P. What hinders adoption of the electric bus in Canadian transit? Perspectives of transit providers. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2018;64:134-49.
  46. Soltani-Sobh A, Heaslip K, Stevanovic A, Bosworth R, Radivojevic D. Analysis of the Electric Vehicles Adoption over the United States. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017;22:203-12.
  47. Jung J, Yeo S, Lee Y, Moon S, Lee D-J. Factors affecting consumers’ preferences for electric vehicle: A Korean case. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 2021:100666.
  48. Moradi E MS. Factors affecting the willingness of consumers to pay for electric vehicles in the country. Journal of Energy Planning and Policy Research. 2020;6(1):195-227.
  49. Schlüter J, Weyer J. Car sharing as a means to raise acceptance of electric vehicles: An empirical study on regime change in automobility. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2019;60:185-201.
  50. Shi X, Wang X, Yang J, Sun Z. Electric vehicle transformation in Beijing and the comparative eco-environmental impacts: A case study of electric and gasoline powered taxis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;137:449-60.
  51. Pardo-Ferreira MdC, Rubio-Romero JC, Galindo-Reyes FC, Lopez-Arquillos A. Work-related road safety: The impact of the low noise levels produced by electric vehicles according to experienced drivers. Safety Science. 2020;121:580-8.
  52. Uslu T, Kaya O. Location and capacity decisions for electric bus charging stations considering waiting times. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2021;90:102645.
  53. Lin Y, Zhang K, Shen Z-JM, Ye B, Miao L. Multistage large-scale charging station planning for electric buses considering transportation network and power grid. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2019;107:423-43.
  54. Miao Q, Welch EW, Sriraj PS. Extreme weather, public transport ridership and moderating effect of bus stop shelters. Journal of Transport Geography. 2019;74:125-33.
  55. Wu J, Liao H. Weather, travel mode choice, and impacts on subway ridership in Beijing. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2020;135:264-79.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,542
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 780