Rotational Stability of the Knee in a Comparative Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Double-Bundle and Single-Bundle Techniques | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 10، شماره 9، آذر 2022، صفحه 775-784 اصل مقاله (777.74 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2022.57558.2852 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Caio Oliveira D`Elia* 1؛ Alexandre Carneiro Bitar2؛ Maria Isabel Orselli3؛ Wagner Castropil3؛ Marcos Duarte4؛ Gilberto Camanho5 | ||
| 11 Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (IOT), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil 2 Instituto Vita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil | ||
| 2Instituto Vita, São Paulo, SP, Brazil | ||
| 3Instituto Vita, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil | ||
| 4Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil | ||
| 5Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (IOT), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: The purpsose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical outcomes of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction either with the DB or SB technique. We hypothesized that the DB technique would provide better rotation control of the knee following ACL reconstruction. Methods: The study included seventy-five participants (26 DB, 22 SB, and 27 healthy volunteers). Only cases with at least one year of postoperative follow-up were included. The participants performed three different demand tasks: walk task, walk and change direction, and stair descent and change direction, which was tracked using a three-dimensional 4-camera optoelectronic system. The following kinematic data were analyzed: tibial rotation amplitude and maximal internal and external rotation. Knees with ACL reconstruction were compared to contralateral knees with intact ACL and healthy knees. Clinical outcomes were determined using the subjective and objective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire and a manual arthrometer (KT 1000). Results: Both surgical groups exhibited similar clinical outcomes (mean subjective IKDC 91 SB vs. 90 DB, P=0.815; KT 1000 difference: 2mm in both groups, P=0.772). The vertical component of the ground force reaction revealed no differences between the surgical and control groups (P>0.05). Tibial rotation amplitude and maximal internal and external rotation were similar between the control, SB, and DB groups in all three different demand tasks (P>0.05). Conclusion: ACL reconstruction using either the SB or DB technique can restore rotational control to the level of a healthy knee. No clinical or functional differences were found between the SB and DB surgical options. Level of evidence: II | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Anterior cruciate ligament؛ Anatomy؛ Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction؛ Biomechanical phenomena | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, et al. Prospective trial of a treatment algorithm for the management of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. Am J Sports Med2005;33(3):335-46. doi: 10.1177/0363546504269590. 2. Georgoulis AD, Papadonikolakis A, Papageorgiou CD, Mitsou A, Stergiou N. Three-Dimensional Tibiofemoral Kinematics of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient and Reconstructed Knee during Walking. Am J Sports Med 2003;31(1):75-79. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310012401. 3. J Jarvela S, Kiekara T, Suomalainen P, Jarvela T. Double-Bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Study With 10-Year Results. Am J Sports Med 2017;45(11):2578-2585. doi: 10.1177/0363546517712231. 4. Dare D, Rodeo S. Mechanisms of post-traumatic osteoarthritis after ACL injury. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2014;16(10). doi: 10.1007/s11926-014-0448-1. 5. Georgoulis AD, Ristanis S, Chouliaras V, Moraiti C, Stergiou N. Tibial rotation is not restored after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; (454):89-94. doi: 10.1097/ BLO.0b013e31802b4a0a. 6. Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Patras K, Vasiliadis HS, Giakas G, Georgoulis AD. Excessive tibial rotation during high-demand activities is not restored by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2005;21(11):1323-1329. doi: 10.1016/j. arthro.2005.08.032. 7. Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Siarava E, Ntoulia A, Mitsionis G, Georgoulis AD. Effect of femoral tunnel placement for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on tibial rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(9):2151- 2158. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00940. 8. Carmont MR, Scheffler S, Spalding T, Brown J, Sutton PM. Anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2011;4(2):65. doi: 10.1007/s12178-011-9081-z. 9. Lord BR, El-Daou H, Zdanowicz U, Ś�migielski R, Amis AA. The Role of Fibers Within the Tibial Attachment of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Restraining Tibial Displacement. Arthroscopy 2019;35(7):2101-2111. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.058. 10.Zantop T, Herbort M, Raschke MJ, Fu FH, Petersen W. The role of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior tibial translation and internal rotation. Am J Sports Med 2007;35(2):223-227. doi: 10.1177/0363546506294571. 11.Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, Amis AA. Biomechanical analysis of knee laxity with isolated anteromedial or posterolateral bundle-deficient anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 2014;30(3):335-343. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.12.003. 12.Tanabe Y, Yasuda K, Kondo E, Kawaguchi Y, Akita K, Yagi T. Comparison of Graft Length Changes During Knee Motion Among 5 Different Anatomic SingleBundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Approaches: A Biomechanical Study. Orthop J Sport Med 2019;7(3). doi: 10.1177/2325967119834933. 13.Dargel J, Gotter M, Mader K, Pennig D, Koebke J, SchmidtWiethoff R. Biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament and implications for surgical reconstruction. Strateg trauma limb Reconstr 2007;2(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s11751-007-0016-6. 14.Amis AA. The functions of the fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior drawer, rotational laxity and the pivot shift. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20(4):613-620. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1864-7. 15.Robinson J, Carrat L, Granchi C, Colombet P. Influence of anterior cruciate ligament bundles on knee kinematics: clinical assessment using computer-assisted navigation. Am J Sports Med 2007;35(12):2006-2013. doi: 10.1177/0363546507308547. 16.Chhabra A, Starman JS, Ferretti M, Vidal AF, Zantop T, Fu FH. Anatomic, radiographic, biomechanical, and kinematic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament and its two functional bundles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(suppl_4):2-10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00616. 17.Gabriel MT, Wong EK, Woo SLY, Yagi M, Debski RE. Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res 2004;22(1):85-89. doi: 10.1016/S0736- 0266(03)00133-5. 18.Zantop T, Wellmann M, Fu FH, Petersen W. Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings. Am J Sports Med 2008;36(1):65-72. doi: 10.1177/0363546507308361. 19.Petersen W, Tretow H, Weimann A, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of two techniques for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one tibial tunnel versus two tibial tunnels. Am J Sports Med 2007;35(2):228-234. doi: 10.1177/0363546506294468. 20.Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2002;30(5):660-666. doi: 10.1177/03635465020300050501. 21.Zelle BA, Brucker PU, Feng MT, Fu FH. Anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Med 2006;36(2):99-108. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636020-00001. 22.Zelle BA, Vidal AF, Brucker PU, Fu FH. Doublebundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: anatomic and biomechanical rationale. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007;15(2):87-96. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200702000-00003. 23.Reinschmidt C, van den Bogert AJ, Nigg BM, Lundberg A, Murphy N. Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. J Biomech 1997;30(7):729-732. doi: 10.1016/s0021- 9290(97)00001-8. 24.Meredick RB, Vance KJ, Appleby D, Lubowitz JH. Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2008;36(7):1414- 1421. doi: 10.1177/0363546508317964. 25.Hemmerich A, van der Merwe W, Batterham M, Vaughan CL. Double-bundle ACL surgery demonstrates superior rotational kinematics to single-bundle technique during dynamic task. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011;26(10):998-1004. doi: 10.1016/j. clinbiomech.2011.06.005. 26.Misonoo G, Kanamori A, Ida H, Miyakawa S, Ochiai N. Evaluation of tibial rotational stability of singlebundle vs. anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during a high-demand activity - a quasi-randomized trial. Knee 2012;19(2):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.01.003. 27.Tsarouhas A, Iosifidis M, Kotzamitelos D, Spyropoulos G, Tsatalas T, Giakas G. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic analysis of knee rotational stability after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2010;26(7):885-893. oi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.11.016. 28.Tsarouhas A, Iosifidis M, Spyropoulos G, Kotzamitelos D, Tsatalas T, Giakas G. Tibial rotation under combined in vivo loading after single- and doublebundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2011;27(12):1654-1662. doi: 10.1016/j. arthro.2011.06.028. 29.Metsavaht L, Leporace G, Riberto M, de Mello Sposito MM, Batista LA. Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Brazilian Version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med 2010;38(9):1894-1899. doi: 10.1177/0363546510365314. 30.Pinczewski LA, Deehan DJ, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Clingeleffer A. A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 2002;30(4):523-536. doi: 10.1177/03635465020300041201. 31.Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J. A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 2007;35(4):564-574. doi: 10.1177/0363546506296042. 32.Järvelä T, Moisala A-S, Sihvonen R, Järvelä S, Kannus P, Järvinen M. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: prospective, randomized, clinical study with 2-year results. Am J Sports Med 2008;36:290-297. doi: 10.1177/0363546507308360. 33.Andriacchi TP, Dyrby CO. Interactions between kinematics and loading during walking for the normal and ACL deficient knee. J Biomech 2005;38(2):293- 298. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.010. 34.Andriacchi TP, Andersson GB, Fermier RW, Stern D, Galante JO. A study of lower-limb mechanics during stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62(5):749- 757. 35.Cappozzo A, Catani F, Leardini A, Benedetti MG, Croce U Della. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1996;11(2):90-100. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00046-1. 36.Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 1983;105(2):136-144. doi: 10.1115/1.3138397. 37.Song EK, Oh LS, Gill TJ, Li G, Gadikota HR, Seon JK. Prospective comparative study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the double-bundle and single-bundle techniques. Am J Sports Med 2009;37(9):1705-1711. doi: 10.1177/0363546509333478. 38.Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Evidence-Based ACL Reconstruction. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2015;3(1):9-12. 39.Maestro A, Herruzo I, Varillas-Delgado D, Martí�nSaborido C. Subjective assessment reported by patients shows differences between single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2021;11(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-021- 94868-0. 40.Seppänen A, Suomalainen P, Huhtala H, Mäenpää H, Kiekara T, Järvelä T. Double bundle ACL reconstruction leads to better restoration of knee laxity and subjective outcomes than single bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022;30(5):1795- 1808.. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06744-z. 41.Noyes FR. The function of the human anterior cruciate ligament and analysis of singleand double-bundle graft reconstructions. Sports Health 2009;1(1):66-75. doi: 10.1177/1941738108326980. 42.Mascarenhas R, Erickson BJ, Sayegh ET, et al. Is there a higher failure rate of allografts compared with autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy 2015;31(2):364-372. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.011. 43.Mascarenhas R, Cvetanovich GL, Sayegh ET, et al. Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy 2015;31(6):1185-1196. doi: 10.1016/j. arthro.2014.11.014. 44.Chen H, Chen B, Tie K, Fu Z, Chen L. Single-bundle versus double-bundle autologous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials at 5-year minimum follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res 2018;13(1). doi: 10.1186/s13018- 018-0753-x. 45.Desai N, Alentorn-Geli E, van Eck CF, et al. A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016;24(3):862-872. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3393-7. 46.Chouliaras V, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, Stergiou N, Georgoulis AD. Effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstrings and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts: an in vivo study comparing tibial internal-external rotation. Am J Sports Med 2007;35(2):189-196. doi: 10.1177/0363546506296040. 47.Moraiti C, Stergiou N, Ristanis S, Georgoulis AD. ACL deficiency affects stride-to-stride variability as measured using nonlinear methodology. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15(12):1406- 1413doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0373-1.. 48.Papadonikolakis A, Cooper L, Stergiou N, Georgoulis A, Soucacos P. Compensatory mechanisms in anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 2003;11(4):235-243. doi: 10.1007/s00167- 003-0367-6. 49.Ristanis S, Giakas G, Papageorgiou CD, Moraiti T, Stergiou N, Georgoulis AD. The effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on tibial rotation during pivoting after descending stairs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003;11(6):360-365. doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0428-x. 50.Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Patras K, Tsepis E, Moraiti C, Georgoulis AD. Follow-up evaluation 2 years after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft shows that excessive tibial rotation persists. Clin J Sport Med 2006;16(2):111-116. doi: 10.1097/00042752- 200603000-00005. 51.Stergiou N, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, Georgoulis AD. Tibial rotation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knees: a theoretical proposition for the development of osteoarthritis. Sports Med 2007;37(7):601-613. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200737070-00004. 52.Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K, Kolowich P, Anderst W. Abnormal Rotational Knee Motion during Running after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2004;32(4):975-983. doi: 10.1177/0363546503261709. 53.Cappozzo A, Catani F, Croce U Della, Leardini A. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1995;10(4):171-178. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)91394-t. 54.Alexander EJ, Andriacchi TP. Correcting for deformation in skin-based marker systems. J Biomech 2001;34(3):355-361. doi: 10.1016/s0021- 9290(00)00192-5 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 509 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 343 |
||