Psychometric Properties of Full and Shortened Persian-version of Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index Questionnaires in Persian-speaking Patients with Shoulder Pain | ||
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
مقاله 4، دوره 10، شماره 8، آبان 2022، صفحه 668-676 اصل مقاله (551.94 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2022.64227.3082 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Maryam Daghiani1؛ Hosein Negahban* 2؛ Neda Mostafaee1؛ Mohammad H. Ebrahimzadeh3؛ Ali Moradi3؛ Amir R. Kachooei3؛ Aref Saidi4 | ||
1Department of Physical Therapy, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
21 Department of Physical Therapy, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran 2 Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
3Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
4Faculty Member, University of Lahore, Pakistan | ||
چکیده | ||
Background: This study aimed to translate the shortened Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (Short-WORC) questionnaire into Persian and determine the psychometric features of WORC and Persian-Short-WORC in patients with shoulder pain. Methods: A total of 130 patients completed Persian-WORC and -Short-WORC, Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI), shortened Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH), WORC, as well as Short-Form health survey (SF-36), in the evaluation and re-evaluation sessions with an interval of 5-7 days to assess reliability and validity. To determine responsiveness, all patients completed questionnaires and a global rating of change scale before and after the 4-week physiotherapy. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for assessing reliability, two-tailed Pearson (r) for validity, as well as longitudinal validity, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis for responsiveness. Results: The ICC was 0.95 (confidence interval: 0.93-0.96) for Short-WORC. A strong correlation was found between Short-WORC, SPADI (r=-0.82), Quick-DASH (r=-0.79), WORC (r=0.92), SF-36 physical (r=0.76), and SF-36 mental (r=0.71). Floor and ceiling effects were not detected. The responsiveness of Short-WORC and WORC was proven with an area under the curve of >0.90, and their minimal important change was 28.56 and 26.28 points, respectively. Conclusion: The Persian version of WORC has good psychometric properties to measure disability and health-related quality of life in patients with shoulder pain. Level of evidence: IV | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Persian؛ Psychometrics؛ Short-WORC؛ WORC | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Greving K, Dorrestijn O, Winters JC, Groenhof F, van der Meer K, Stevens M, et al. Incidence, prevalence, and consultation rates of shoulder complaints in general practice. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012;41(2):150-5. 2. Ö stör AJK, Richards CA, Prevost AT, Speed CA, Hazleman BL. Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care. Rheumatology. 2005;44(6):800-5. 3. Lewis J. Rotator cuff related shoulder pain: Assessment, management and uncertainties. Manual Therapy. 2016;23:57-68. 4. Kirkley A, Alvarez C, Griffin S. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for disorders of the rotator cuff: The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13(2):84-92. 5. Furtado R, MacDermid JC, Nazari G, Bryant DM, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. Cross-cultural adaptions and measurement properties of the WORC (Western Ontario rotator cuff index): a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):17. 6. Wiertsema SH, Rietberg MB, Hekman KM, Schothorst M, Steultjens MP, Dekker J. Reproducibility of the Dutch version of the Western Ontario rotator cuff Index. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(2):165-70. 7. Brix LD, Bjørnholdt KT, Nikolajsen L, Kallestrup K, Thillemann TM. The Danish version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Dan Med J. 2020;67(2). 8. Mousavi SJ, Hadian MR, Abedi M, Montazeri A. Translation and validation study of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Clin Rheumatol. 2009;28(3):293-9. 9. Razmjou H, Stratford P, Holtby R. A Shortened Version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Disability Index: Development and Measurement Properties. Physiother Can. 2012;64(2):135-44. 10.Wessel J, Razmjou H, Mewa Y, Holtby R. The factor validity of the western ontario rotator cuff index. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6(1):1-7. 11.Dewan N, MacDermid JC, MacIntyre N, Grewal R. Reproducibility: reliability and agreement of short version of Western Ontario rotator cuff index (shortWORC) in patients with rotator cuff disorders. J Hand Ther. 2016;29(3):281-91. 12.Dewan N, MacDermid JC, MacIntyre N. Validity and Responsiveness of the Short Version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (Short-WORC) in Patients With Rotator Cuff Repair. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(5):409-18. 13.Furtado R, MacDermid JC, Bryant DM, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. Interpretation and content validity of the items of the numeric rating version short-WORC to evaluate outcomes in management of rotator cuff pathology: a cognitive interview approach. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):88. 14.Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91. 15.Houweling TA. Reporting improvement from patientreported outcome measures: A review. Clinical Chiropractic. 2010;13(1):15-22. 16. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(5):459-68. 17.Holtby R, Razmjou H. Measurement properties of the Western Ontario rotator cuff outcome measure: a preliminary report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(5):506-10. 18.Ebrahimzadeh MH, Moradi A, Vahedi E, Kachooei AR, Birjandinejad A. Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (Quick-DASH). Int J Prev Med. 2015;6:59. 19.Budtz CR, Andersen JH, de Vos Andersen N-B, Christiansen DH. Responsiveness and minimal important change for the quick-DASH in patients with shoulder disorders. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):226. 20.Williams JW, Jr., Holleman DR, Jr., Simel DL. Measuring shoulder function with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(4):727-32. 21.Ebrahimzadeh MH, Birjandinejad A, Golhasani F Moradi A, Vahedi E, Kachooei AR. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability testing of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in the Persian population with shoulder problems. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38(1):84-7. 22.Negahban H, Behtash Z, Sohani SM, Salehi R. Responsiveness of two Persian-versions of shoulder outcome measures following physiotherapy intervention in patients with shoulder disorders. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(24):2300-4. 23.Jerosch-Herold C, Chester R, Shepstone L, Vincent JI, MacDermid JC. An evaluation of the structural validity of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) using the Rasch model. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(2):389-400. 24.Motamed N, Ayatollahi AR, Zare N, SadeghiHassanabadi A. Validity and reliability of the Persian translation of the SF-36 version 2 questionnaire. East Mediterr Health J. 2005;11(3):349-57. 25.Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539-49. 26.Negahban H, Pouretezad M, Yazdi MJS, Sohani SM, Mazaheri M, Salavati M, et al. Persian translation and validation of the Kujala Patellofemoral Scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2259-63. 27.Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420. 28.Zhaeentan S, Legeby M, Ahlstrom S, Stark A, Salomonsson B. A validation of the Swedish version of the WORC index in the assessment of patients treated by surgery for subacromial disease including rotator cuff syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:165. 29.Razmjou H, Bean A, van Osnabrugge V, MacDermid JC, Holtby R. Cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two rotator cuff disease-specific outcome measures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7(1):26. 30.Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:S15-20. 31.de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. 32.Miller, J. Philip, Rao, C. Radhakrishna, Rao, D. C. Essential Statistical Methods for Medical Statistics. Burlington: North Holland; 2011. 33.Furtado R, MacDermid JC, Bryant DM, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. Evaluating the reproducibility of the short version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (ShortWORC) prospectively. JSES Int. 2020;4(1):197-201. 34.Locker D, Jokovic A, Clarke M. Assessing the responsiveness of measures of oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004;32(1):10-8. 35.St-Pierre C, Dionne CE, Desmeules F, Roy JS. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a Canadian French adaptation of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index. J Hand Ther. 2015;28(3):292-9. 36.de Witte PB, Henseler JF, Nagels J, Vliet Vlieland TP, Nelissen RG. The Western Ontario rotator cuff index in rotator cuff disease patients: a comprehensive reliability and responsiveness validation study. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(7):1611-9. 37.Braun C, Handoll HH. Estimating the Minimal Important Difference for the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) in adults with shoulder pain associated with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018;35:30-3. 38.Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 620 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 498 |