Sabzehei, Mohammad Kazem, Basiri, Behnaz, Shokouhi, Maryam, Afkhami Goli, Mojdeh, Eghbalian, Fatemeh, Moradi, Abbas. (1401). Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) Vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) after Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. , 10(5), 15972-15981. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2022.62445.4775
Mohammad Kazem Sabzehei; Behnaz Basiri; Maryam Shokouhi; Mojdeh Afkhami Goli; Fatemeh Eghbalian; Abbas Moradi. "Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) Vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) after Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome". , 10, 5, 1401, 15972-15981. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2022.62445.4775
Sabzehei, Mohammad Kazem, Basiri, Behnaz, Shokouhi, Maryam, Afkhami Goli, Mojdeh, Eghbalian, Fatemeh, Moradi, Abbas. (1401). 'Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) Vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) after Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome', , 10(5), pp. 15972-15981. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2022.62445.4775
Sabzehei, Mohammad Kazem, Basiri, Behnaz, Shokouhi, Maryam, Afkhami Goli, Mojdeh, Eghbalian, Fatemeh, Moradi, Abbas. Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) Vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) after Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. , 1401; 10(5): 15972-15981. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2022.62445.4775

Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) Vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) after Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Journal of Pediatric Perspectives
دوره 10، شماره 5، مرداد 2022، صفحه 15972-15981    اصل مقاله (539.36 K)
نوع مقاله: original article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/ijp.2022.62445.4775
نویسندگان
Mohammad Kazem Sabzehei* 1؛ Behnaz Basiri2؛ Maryam Shokouhi3؛ Mojdeh Afkhami Goli4؛ Fatemeh Eghbalian5؛ Abbas Moradi6
1Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
2Department of Pediatrics, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3hamedan university of medical science
4Department of Pediatrics, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
5Pediatric department, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences , Hamadan , Iran
6Department of community medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Science , Hamadan, Iran.
چکیده
Background: There is insufficient evidence supporting the superiority of the Nasal Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) over the Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) in initial respiratory support of preterm neonates suffering from the Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS). The present study intended to compare the effectiveness of these two approaches in preterm neonates with RDS who receive the Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA).
Methods: The present clinical trial included 95 preterm neonates at the Fatemieh Hospital, Hamadan, Iran, from October 2019 to September 2020, with RDS, admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Sampling was performed using the convenience method. The participants were randomly assigned into two groups that received the NIPPV (n=48) or NCPAP (n=47) as the respiratory support method. Moreover, the neonates received LISA if needed. The groups were compared in the outcomes, such as the need for intubation within 72 hours after birth.
Results: The groups were similar in clinical characteristics at birth. According to our findings, the NIPPV group had a significantly lower rate of need for intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation within 72 hours after birth  compared to the control group (8.3% vs. 27.7%, P=0.014); however, the groups were not significantly different regarding the need for the second dose of surfactant (66% vs. 56.2%, P=0.332), the mean respiratory support duration (6.89±3.20 vs. 6.70±3.71 days, P=0.295), the mean hospital stay (19.52±12.364 vs. 17.40±9.57 days, P=0.591), development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (4.2% vs. 8.5%, P=0.435), and mortality (6.25% vs. 12.8%, P=0.317).
Conclusion: Compared to NCPAP, the NIPPV could significantly reduce the need for invasive mechanical ventilation within 72 hours after birth in neonates undergoing LISA
کلیدواژه‌ها
RDS؛ Preterm infants؛ NIPPV؛ NCPAP؛ LISA
مراجع
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 912
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 761
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد
آمار
تعداد نشریات29
تعداد شماره‌ها2,322
تعداد مقالات24,844
تعداد مشاهده مقاله82,636,608
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله45,755,336
اخبار نشریات