سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

Afshari, Mostafa, Majidi, Masoud, Yadolahzadeh, Ahdiyeh. (1401). Risky Decision Making and Impulsivity in Adolescents’ Chess Players: Does Chess Modify or Induce Risky Decisions?. , 10(5), 16101-16111. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2020.51599.4100
Mostafa Afshari; Masoud Majidi; Ahdiyeh Yadolahzadeh. "Risky Decision Making and Impulsivity in Adolescents’ Chess Players: Does Chess Modify or Induce Risky Decisions?". , 10, 5, 1401, 16101-16111. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2020.51599.4100
Afshari, Mostafa, Majidi, Masoud, Yadolahzadeh, Ahdiyeh. (1401). 'Risky Decision Making and Impulsivity in Adolescents’ Chess Players: Does Chess Modify or Induce Risky Decisions?', , 10(5), pp. 16101-16111. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2020.51599.4100
Afshari, Mostafa, Majidi, Masoud, Yadolahzadeh, Ahdiyeh. Risky Decision Making and Impulsivity in Adolescents’ Chess Players: Does Chess Modify or Induce Risky Decisions?. , 1401; 10(5): 16101-16111. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2020.51599.4100

Risky Decision Making and Impulsivity in Adolescents’ Chess Players: Does Chess Modify or Induce Risky Decisions?

International Journal of Pediatrics
دوره 10، شماره 5، مرداد 2022، صفحه 16101-16111    اصل مقاله (747.44 K)
نوع مقاله: original article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/ijp.2020.51599.4100
نویسندگان
Mostafa Afshari1؛ Masoud Majidi* 2؛ Ahdiyeh Yadolahzadeh3
1Department of Sport Management, Sport Management Research center, Sport Science Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.
2Department of Physical Education, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3Department of Physical Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Background: Our main goal in this study was to evaluate impulsivity and risky decision making in adolescents’ intermediate-expert chess players and compare them with non-players. We also looked at the relationship between impulsivity and risky decision making in the two groups.
Method: The present study employed a comparative-correlational method which was performed in 2019 in Tehran. Based on the previous research, 55 chess players (14-17 years old) and 79 non-players (13-17 years old) participated in the study. Impulsivity was measured by the Go/no-go task; and risky decision making was assessed via the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Independent t-test and Pearson Correlation Coefficient were used for statistical analysis.
Results: There were no significant differences between groups regarding age or education. In the go/no go tasks, there were significant differences between the groups in commission error, omission error and inhibition subscales. In the IGT, we observed significant differences between the groups in the net score, raw score and ratio of advantageous/disadvantageous choices in different subscales. In both groups, net scores, raw scores and ratio of advantageous/disadvantageous choices were negatively correlated with the commission error. Additionally, omission error was positively correlated with the inhibition subscale. We found that the relationship between impulsivity and risky decision making was stronger in non-chess players than chess players.
Conclusion: The results of this study might put chess in the spotlight as an option to improve impulsivity and risky decision making in clinical settings.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Chess؛ impulsivity؛ risky decision making؛ adolescents
مراجع
  1. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain, 1992; 5(4): 297-323.
  2. Kusev P, van Schaik P. Preferences under risk: content-dependent behavior and psychological processing. Front Psychol, 2011; 2: 269.
  3. Vlaev I, Kusev P, Stewart N, Aldrovandi S, Chater N. Domain effects and financial risk attitudes. Risk Anal, 2010; 30(9): 1374-1386.
  4. Loewenstein G, Lerner JS. The role of affect in decision making. In R. Davidson, H. Goldsmith, & K. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of Affective Science (pp. 619-642). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003.
  5. Rolison M, Scherman A. Factor’s influencing adolescents' decision to engage in risk-taking behavior. Adolescence, 2002; 37(147): 585-596.
  6. Eysenck SBG. The I₇: Development of a measure of impulsivity and its relationship to the superfactors of personality. In The impulsive client: Theory, research, and treatment. (pp. 141-149). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. 1993.
  7. Dickman SJ. Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: personality and cognitive correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1990; 58(1): 95-102.
  8. Dickman S. Impulsivity and Information Processing. 1993.
  9. Barratt ES. Impulsiveness and aggression. In Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment. (pp. 61-79). Chicago, IL, US: University of Chicago Press. 1994.
  10. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol, 1995; 51(6): 768-774.
  11. Chamberlain SR, Sahakian BJ. The neuropsychiatry of impulsivity. Curr Opin Psychiatry, 2007; 20(3): 255-261.
  12. Chudasama Y. Animal models of prefrontal-executive function. Behav Neurosci, 2011; 125(3): 327-343.
  13. Raine A, Reynolds C, Venables PH, Mednick SA, Farrington DP. Fearlessness, stimulation-seeking, and large body size at age 3 years as early predispositions to childhood aggression at age 11 years. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1998; 55(8): 745-751.
  14. Masse LC, Tremblay RE. Behavior of boys in kindergarten and the onset of substance use during adolescence. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1997; 54(1): 62-68.
  15. Moeller FG, Barratt ES, Dougherty DM, Schmitz JM, Swann AC. Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. Am J Psychiatry, 2001; 158(11): 1783-1793.
  16. Martin LE, Potts GF. Impulsivity in Decision-Making: An Event-Related Potential Investigation. Pers individ differ, 2009; 46(3): 303-303.
  17. Omizo MM, Michael WB. Biofeedback-Induced Relaxation Training and Impulsivity, Attention to Task, and Locus of Control among Hyperactive Boys. J Learn Disabil, 1982; 15(7): 414-416.
  18. Thompson L, Thompson M. Neurofeedback Combined with Training in Metacognitive Strategies: Effectiveness in Students with ADD. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 1998; 23(4): 243-263.
  19. Giel KE, Schag K, Plewnia C, Zipfel S. Anti-Saccadic Training to Improve Impulsivity in Binge Eating Disorder. Eur Eat Disord Rev, 2013; 21(6): 488-492.
  20. Tárrega S, Castro-Carreras L, Fernández-Aranda F, Granero R, Giner-Bartolomé C, Aymamí N, Jiménez-Murcia S. A Serious Videogame as an Additional Therapy Tool for Training Emotional Regulation and Impulsivity Control in Severe Gambling Disorder. Front Psychol, 2015; 6(1721).
  21. Franco C, Amutio A, López-González L, Oriol X, Martínez-Taboada C. Effect of a Mindfulness Training Program on the Impulsivity and Aggression Levels of Adolescents with Behavioral Problems in the Classroom. Front Psychol, 2016; 7(1385).
  22. Kazemi F, Yektayar M, Abad AMB. Investigation the impact of chess play on developing meta-cognitive ability and math problem-solving power of students at different levels of education. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 2012; 32: 372-379.
  23. Wessel TC, Aciego R. Neuropsychological impact of chess on executive functions and attention of adolescents: A quasi-experimental pilot study. 2017.
  24. Connors M, Burns B, Campitelli G. Expertise in Complex Decision Making: The Role of Search in Chess 70 Years after de Groot. Cog Sci, 2011; 35(8): 1567-1579.
  25. Sigman M, Etchemendy P, Slezak DF, Cecchi GA. Response time distributions in rapid chess: a large-scale decision making experiment. Front Neurosci, 2010; 4: 60-60.
  26. Eagle DM, Bari A, Robbins TW. The neuropsychopharmacology of action inhibition: cross-species translation of the stop-signal and go/no-go tasks. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 2008; 199(3): 439-456.
  27. Bolt T, Laurienti PJ, Lyday R, Morgan A, Dagenbach D. Graph-theoretical study of functional changes associated with the Iowa gambling task. Front Hum Neurosci, 2016; 10: 314.
  28. Li X, Lu ZL, Dargembeau A, Ng M, Bechara A. The Iowa gambling task in fMRI images. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010; 31(3): 410-423.
  29. Avni A, Kipper DA, Fox S. Personality and leisure activities: an illustration with chess players. Pers Individ Differ, 1978; 8(5):715-719.
  30. Mazur A, Booth A, Dabbs Jr J. Testosterone and Chess Competition, Soc Psychol Q, 1992; 55(1): 70-77.
  31. Joireman J, Fick C, Anderson J. Sensation seeking and involvement in chess, Pers Individ Differ, 2002; 32(3): 509-515.
  32. Magid V, Maclean MG, Colder CR. Differentiating between sensation seeking and impulsivity through their mediated relations with alcohol use and problems. Addict Behav, 2007; 32(10): 2046-2061.
  33. Nagoshi CT, Wilson JR, Rodriguez LA. Impulsivity, sensation seeking, and behavioral and emotional responses to alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 1991; 15(4): 661-667.
  34. Sheridan H, Reingold EM. Chess players' eye movements reveal rapid recognition of complex visual patterns: Evidence from a chess-related visual search taskSheridan & Reingold. J Vis, 2017; 17(3): 4-14.
  35. Church RM, Church KW. Plans, goals, and search strategies for the selection of a move in chess. In P. W. Frey (Ed.), Chess Skill in Man and Machine (pp. 131-156). New York, NY: Springer New York. 1983.
  36. Cheng GL, Lee TM. Altering risky decision-making: Influence of impulsivity on the neuromodulation of the prefrontal cortex. Soc Neurosci, 2016; 11(4): 353-364.
  37. Burnett Heyes S, Adam R, Urner M, van der Leer L, Bahrami B, Bays P, Husain M. Impulsivity and Rapid Decision-Making for Reward. Front Psychol, 2012; 3(153).
  38. Martini A, Ellis SJ, Grange JA, Tamburin S, Dal Lago D, Vianello G, Edelstyn NMJ. Risky decision-making and affective features of impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna), 2018; 125(2): 131-143.
  39. Gabriel DBK, Freels TG, Setlow B, Simon NW. Risky decision-making is associated with impulsive action and sensitivity to first-time nicotine exposure. Behav Brain Res, 2019; 359: 579-588.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 356
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 360