Comparison of Differences in Complications and Revision After Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty from Plating vs. Nailing vs. Hemiarthroplasty | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 10، شماره 9، آذر 2022، صفحه 785-790 اصل مقاله (431.53 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2021.60893.3000 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Senthil Sambandam* 1؛ Varatharaj Mounasamy2؛ Dane Wukich2 | ||
| 1University of Texas Southwestern, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon, Dallas VAMC, Dallas, Texas | ||
| 2Department of Orthopedics, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas VAMC, Dallas, Texas | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA)after previous hip surgery increases the procedure complexity and complication rate. We investigated the complication rates following conversion to total hip arthroplasty from three hip surgeries, namely plate fixation of the intertrochanteric fracture, nailing of the trochanteric fracture, and hemiarthroplasty of the hip. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted using the PearlDiver database (www.pearldiverinc.com, Colorado Springs) and identified all patients undergoing THA between 2010 and 2019. Among this group, we included all patients who had received one of the three procedures , hip hemiarthroplasty (CPT 27125), fixation of the intertrochanteric fracture with plates and screws (CPT 27444), or fixation of hip fracture with nail (CPT 27445) within two years of THA. We analyzed complications in these patients and compared it to the complication rate in primary THA patients. The complications analyzed were 30-day transfusion risk, 90-day surgical site infection (SSI) risk, 90-day periprosthetic fracture risk, 1-year dislocation risk, and 2-, 5-, and 10-year revision risk. Results: A total of 118,209 patients underwent THA between 2010 and 2019. A total of 9,173, 48,326, and 31,632 patients underwent fixation with plates and screws , nailing and hemiarthroplasty respectively. We identified 71, 42, and 160 patients with hemiarthroplasty, plates & screws, and nailing, respectively, within two years of THA. 117,936 primary THA patients were used as a comparison group. The nailing group had the highest rate of transfusion risk (OR=2.34, 95% CI=1.32, 4.13, P<0.05). Furthermore, the hemiarthroplasty group had highest rate of SSI risk (OR=9.25, 95% CI=4.86, 17.63, P<0.05) and highest revision risk at 2 years (OR=10.532, 95% CI= 6.09, 18.19, P<0.05). Conclusion: Conversion of hemiarthroplasty to THA was associated with a higher risk of infection and revision. Hence, surgeons considering primary hip hemiarthroplasty for severely comminuted intertrochanteric fracture should exercise caution, especially for active elderly patients. Level of evidence: III | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Cephalomedullary nailing؛ Complication؛ Conversion hip؛ Hemiarthroplasty؛ Plating؛ Revision | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Douglas SJ, Remily EA, Sax OC, Pervaiz SS, Delanois RE, Johnson AJ. How Does Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Compare to Primary? J Arthroplasty 2021; 36(7):S155-S159. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.023. 2. Godoy-Monzon D, Diaz Dilernia F, Piccaluga F, Cid Casteulani A, Turus L, Buttaro M. Conversion total hip arthroplasty with a proximally modular, distal Fixation reconstruction prosthesis following cephalomedullar nail failure. Hip Int 2020; 30(1_suppl):26-33. doi: 10.1177/1120700020937952. 3. Sarpong NO, Grosso MJ, Lakra A, Held MB, Herndon CL, Cooper HJ. Hemiarthroplasty Conversion: A Comparison to Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34(6):1168-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.043. 4. Hernandez NM, Fruth KM, Larson DR, Kremers HM, Sierra RJ. Conversion of Failed Hemiarthroplasty to Total Hip Arthroplasty Remains High Risk for Subsequent Complications. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34(9):2030-2036. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.042. 5. Qin CD, Helfrich MM, Fitz DW, Oyer MA, Hardt KD, Manning DW. Differences in Post-Operative Outcome between Conversion and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33(5):1477-1480. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.039. 6. Sarpong NO, Grosso MJ, Lakra A,et al. Outcomes and survivorship after conversion of failed hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2021; 31(3):388-392. doi: 10.1177/1120700019891427. 7. Schwarzkopf R, Chin G, Kim K, Murphy D, Chen AF. Do Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Yield Comparable Results to Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2017; 32(3):862-871. doi: 10.1016/j. arth.2016.08.036. 8. De Meo D, Ferraro D, Petriello L, et al. Outcome and technical consideration of conversion total hip arthroplasty after failed fixation of intracapsular and extracapsular hip fractures: Are they really that different? Injury 2020; 22:9040. doi: 10.1016/j. injury.2020.09.045. 9. Sah AP, Estok DM. Dislocation rate after conversion from hip Hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90(3):506-16. doi: 10.2106/ JBJS.G.00479. 10.Alazzawi S, Sprenger De Rover WB, Brown J, Davis B. The conversion rate of Bipolar hemiarthroplasty after a hip fracture to a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 2012; 4(2):117-20. doi: 10.4055/ cios.2012.4.2.117. 11.Fichman SG, Mäkinen TJ, Vincent A, Lozano B, Safir O, Kuzyk PR. Complications following conversion of a hip hemiarthroplasty to a total hip Arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2015; 39(12):2335-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264- 015-2827-2. 12.Diwanji SR, Kim SK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Yoon TR. Clinical results of Conversion total hip arthroplasty after failed bipolar hemiarthroplasty. JArthroplasty 2008; 23(7):1009-15. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.006. 13.Figved W, Dybvik E, Frihagen F, et al. Conversion from failed hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: a Norwegian Arthroplasty Register analysis of 595 hips with previous femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop 2007;78(6):711-8. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014473. 14.Baghoolizadeh M, Schwarzkopf R. The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is it a Primary or Revision Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31(9 Suppl):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.024. 15.Smith A, Denehy K, Ong KL, Lau E, Hagan D, Malkani A. Total hip arthroplasty Following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation treated with a cephalomedullary nail. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B (6_Supple_B):91-96. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6. BJJ-2018-1375.R1. 16.Yuan BJ, Abdel MP, Cross WW, Berry DJ. Hip Arthroplasty After Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32(11):3438-3444. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.06.032. 17.Exaltacion JJ, Incavo SJ, Mathews V, Parsley B, Noble P. Hip arthroplasty After intramedullary hip screw fixation: a perioperative evaluation. J Orthop Trauma 2012; 26(3):141-7. doi: 10.1097/ BOT.0b013e318221ea6b. 18.Zeng X, Zhan K, Zhang L, et al. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty after failed proximal femoral nail antirotations or dynamic hip screw fixations for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: a retrospective study with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/ s12891-017-1415-6. 19.Yu W, Han X, Chen W, et al. Conversion from a failed proximal femoral nail anti-rotation to a cemented or uncemented total hip arthroplasty device: a retrospective review of 198 hips with previous intertrochanteric femur fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21(1):791. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020- 03806-0. 20.Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Replacement arthroplasty versus internal fixation for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006: 2006(2):CD000086. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD000086.pub2. 21.Newman JM, Webb MR, Klika AK, Murray TG, Barsoum WK, Higuera CA. Quantifying Blood Loss and Transfusion Risk after Primary vs Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32(6):1902- 1909. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.038. 22.Pankaj A, Malhotra R, Bhan S. Conversion of failed hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: a short to mid-term follow-up study. Indian J Orthop 2008;42(3):294-300. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.41852. 23.Park KS, Chan CK, Lee DH, Yoon TR. Midterm Results of Conversion from Failed Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty to Total Hip Arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 2018; 52(4):369 373. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_494_16. 24.Ryan SP, DiLallo M, Attarian DE, Jiranek WA, Seyler TM. Conversion vs Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Increased Cost of Care and Perioperative Complications. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33(8):2405-2411. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.006. 25.Morice A, Ducellier F, Bizot P. Total hip arthroplasty after failed fixation of a proximal femur fracture: Analysis of 59 cases of intra- and extra-capsular fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2018; 104(5):681-686. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.015. 26.Dix DB, Araoye IB, Staggers JR, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications in conversion arthroplasty methods for failed intertrochanteric fracture fixation. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2019; 10(2):282-285. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.02.007. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 580 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 411 |
||