پیشبینی رفتار اخلاقی براساس هوش اخلاقی و ویژگیهای شخصیتی: نقش میانجی سازه خود –فراروی | ||
مجله اصول بهداشت روانی | ||
دوره 23، شماره 4، مرداد و شهریور 1400، صفحه 273-284 اصل مقاله (554.01 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/jfmh.2021.18995 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Hossein Mohagheghi* 1؛ Mehran Farhadi2؛ Khosro Rashid3؛ Arezou Delfan Beiranvand4 | ||
1Associate professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economic and Social Science, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran | ||
2Assistant professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economics and Sciences Social, Bu- Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran | ||
3Associate professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
4PhD. student in educational psychology, Faculty of Economics and Sciences Social, Bu- Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
مقدمه: هدف این پژوهش، پیشبینی رفتار اخلاقی براساس هوش اخلاقی و ویژگیهای شخصیتی با میانجیگری سازه خود-فراروی بود. روش کار: جامعهی آماری این مطالعه توصیفی-همبستگی شامل تمام دانشجویان دانشگاه بوعلی سینا در سال تحصیلی 400-1399 بود. تعداد 285 نفر، مقیاسهای رفتار اخلاقی، هوش اخلاقی، شخصیت هگزاکو و مقیاس خود - فراروی را تکمیل کردند. تحلیل دادهها با مدل معادلات ساختاری با نرمافزار لیزرل انجام شد. یافته ها: مدل پیشنهادی با دادههای تجربی برازش مناسبی دارد (94= GFI، 93= IFI، 95= CFI). نتایج تحلیل ضرایب رگرسیونی در مدل معادلات ساختاری نشان داد که اثر هوش اخلاقی (01/0, P< 41/0β= )، صداقت- فروتنی (01/0, P< 27/0 β=)، وظیفهشناسی (01/0, P< 30/0 β=) و تجربهگرایی (01/0, P< 24/0 β=) بر خود-فراروی، و اثر هوش اخلاقی (01/0, P< 49/0β= )، صداقت- فروتنی (01/0, P< 25/0 β=)، وظیفهشناسی (01/0, P< 23/0 β=) و تجربهگرایی (01/0, P< 21/0 β=) و اثر خود-فراروی (01/0, P< 43/0 β=) بر رفتار اخلاقی مثبت و معنادار بودند. نتایج حاصل از آزمون سوبل نشان داد که متغیر خود - فراروی در ارتباط بین هوش اخلاقی (01/0, P< 30/7 Z=)، و صداقت- فروتنی (01/0, P< 29/5 Z=)، وظیفهشناسی (01/0, P< 61/4 Z=) و تجربه گرایی (01/0, P< 16/4 Z=) با رفتار اخلاقی نقش واسطهای معناداری دارد. نتیجهگیری: به نظر می رسد خود-فراروی نقش میانجی در رابطه میان هوش اخلاقی و ویژگیهای شخصیتی با رفتار اخلاقی بازی میکند. یافتههای این پژوهش میتواند تلویحات تازهای در زمینه رفتار اخلاقی در موقعیتهای گوناگون به همراه داشته باشد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Keywords: Moral behavior؛ Moral intelligence؛ Personality traits؛ Self-transcendence | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Starc M. Ethics and the ethical attitude. Jung journal 2017; 11(1), 47-52. 2. Miller MJ, Woehr DJ. Hudspeth N. Monography: The meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventory. J Vocat Behav 2002; 60(2): 451-89. 3. Treynor WFC. Are the Mistrustful the least trustworthy? Studies of unethical behavior. USA: University of Michigan; 2004. 4. Haidt J. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Random House; 2012. 5. Reynolds SJ, Ceranic TL. The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. J Appl Psychol 2007; 92(6): 1610-24. 6. Suhonen R, Stolt M, Virtanen H, Leino-Kilpi H. Organizational ethics: A literature review. Nurs Ethics 2011; 18(3): 285-303. 7. Kochanksa G, Aksan, N. Children’s conscience and self-regulation. J Pers 2006; 74(6): 1578-617. 8. Koenig AL, Cicchetti D, Rogosch FA. Child compliance/noncompliance and maternal contributors to internalization in maltreating and no maltreating dyads. Child Dev 2000; 71(1): 1018-32. 9. Saleh K. Moral intelligence and its role in formulating children characters. Multi knowledge electronic comprehensive journal for education and science publications 2018; 7: 301-13. 10. Lennick D, Kiel F. Worksheet for defining your code of ethics. Moral IQ 2011; 21(1): 1-13. 11. Martin DE, Sloan R. Plagiarism, integrity, and workplace deviance: a criterion study. Ethics Behav 2008; 19(1): 36-51. 12. Borba M. Building moral intelligence. USA: Jossey-Bass; 2011. 13. Narvaez D. The emotional foundation of high moral intelligence. Directions for child and adolescents development 2010; 129: 77-94. 14. Khaleghi N, Chenari M. [The relationship of moral intelligence and altruism]. Ethics in science and technology 2016; 10(4): 55-64. (Persian) 15. Auvinen J, Suominen T, Leino-Kilpi H, Helkama K. The development of moral judgment during nursing education in Finland. Nurs Edus Today 2004; 24(7): 538-46. 16. Ngammuk P. A study of 8 fundamental moral characteristics among Thai undergraduate students. The Hawaii International Conference on Education; 2011: 4-7. 17. Ansari Shahidi M, Tat M, Badrizadeh A, Maleki S. [The role of ethical intelligence and professional value in predicting nurses' resilience]. Yafte 2018; 20(3): 48-58. (Persian) 18. Kalshoven K, Den Hartog DN, De Hoogh AHB. Ethical leader behavior and big five factors of personality. J Bus Ethics 2011; 100(1): 349-66. 19. Lee K, Ogunfowora B, Ashton MC. Personality traits beyond the big five: are they within the HEXACO space? J Pers 2005; 73(5): 1437-63. MORAL INTELLIGENCE AND PERSONALITY TRAITS MOHAGHEGHI ET AL. Fundamentals of Mental Health, 2021 Jul-Aug http://jfmh.mums.ac.ir 284 20. Khezri S, Manavipour D. [Psychometric properties of HEXACO personality inventory among students]. Shefaye Khatam 2016; 4(4): 50-60. (Persian) 21. Yablovi B, Mostahfezian M, Meshkati Z. [Relationship between ethical factors and personality traits]. Ethics in science and technology 2016; 11(1): 137-44. (Persian) 22. Fischer A. Assessment of problem solving skills by means of multiple complex systems – validity of finite automata and linear dynamic systems. Ph.D. Dissertation. Heidelberg; 2015. 23. Le TN, Levenson MR. Wisdom as self-transcendence: What’s love (and individualism) have to do with it? J Res Pers 2005; 39(4): 443-57. 24. Thomas ML, Bangen KJ, Ardelt M, Jeste DV. Development of a 12-Item Abbreviated Three Dimensional Wisdom Scale (3D-WS-12) item selection and psychometric properties. Assessment 2017; 24(1): 71-82. 25. Kordnoghabi R. [The psychology of wisdom]. Tehran: Arjmand; 2017. (Persian) 26. Kohlberg L. Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In: Goslin DA. (editor). Handbook of socialization theory and research, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally; 1969: 347-480. 27. Levenson M, Jenninges PA, Aldwin CM, Shiraishi RW. Self-transcendence: conceptualization and measurement. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2005; 60(2): 127-43. 28. Oden CD, Ardelt M, Ruppel CP. Wisdom and its relation to ethical attitude in organizations. Bus Prof Ethics J 2015; 34(2): 141-64. 29. Azadmanesh M, Abolmaali K, Mohammadi A. [The structural relationship between wisdom and moral behavior: The mediating role of self-control]. Journal of developmental 2020; 16: 321-32. (Persian) 30. Desi D, Rodelando O. Levels of moral intelligence virtues and wisdom development among selected Filipino working adults. The Bedan journal of psychology 2017; 1(1): 61-66. 31. Kang MJ, Glassman M. Moral action as social capital, moral thought as cultural capital. J Moral Educ 2010; 39(1): 21‐36. 32. Termini KA, Golden JA. Moral behaviors: What can behaviorists learn from the developmental literature? Int J Behav Consult Ther 2007; 3(4): 1-16. 33. Ellemers N, Van der Toorn JV, Paunov Y, Van Leeuwen T. The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies published from 1940 through 2017. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2019; 23(4): 332-66. 34. Hiro TY, Yamamoto T. Statistical inference in vector auto regressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econom 1995; 66(1-2): 225-50. 35. Hooman H. [Structural equation modeling using LISREL Software]. 1 st ed. Tehran: Samat; 2005. (Persian) 36. Mohammadi S, Nakhaei N, Borhani F, Roshanzadeh M. [Moral intelligence in nursing: a cross-sectional study in East of Iran]. Iranian journal of medical ethics and history of medicine 2013; 6(5): 57-66. (Persian) 37. Arasteh HR, Azizi Shamami M, Jafari Rad A, Mohammadi Jozani Z. [Assessing the status of students' moral intelligence]. Journal of cultural strategy 2010; 10: 201-14. (Persian) 38. Bahrami MA, Asami M, Fatehpanah A, Dehghani Tafti A, Ahmadi Tehrani G. [Moral intelligence status of the faculty members and staff of the Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences of Yazd]. Iranian journal of medical ethics and history of medicine 2012; 5(6): 81-95. (Persian) 39. Ashton MC, Lee K. The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. J Pers Assess 2009; 91(1): 340-45. 40. Ghalenei RI, Abolghasemi A, Rostami M. [Role of HEXACO personality dimensions, D personality type and emotions in the quality of life of people suffering from cancer]. Journal of Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences 2014; 2(3): 10-21. (Persian) 41. Aghababaei N. [The relationship between honesty and humility with personality, religion and subjective wellbeing]. Journal of psychology and religion 2012; 19(1): 40-2. (Persian) Kord Noghabi R, Jahan F, Rashid Kh, Rezaei A. [Measure of wisdom in Iran (introduce and validate3 scale)]. Measurement | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 933 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 725 |