Evaluation of debridement effects of bromelain-loaded sodium alginate nanoparticles incorporated into chitosan hydrogel in animal models | ||
Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences | ||
دوره 24، شماره 10، دی 2021، صفحه 1404-1412 اصل مقاله (1.21 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/ijbms.2021.58798.13060 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Samaneh Bayat1؛ Akram Rabbani Zabihi1؛ Sara Amel Farzad2؛ Jebreel Movafagh3؛ Ezzat Hashemi4؛ Sepideh Arabzadeh5؛ Maryam Hashemi* 6، 7 | ||
1Scool of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
2Pharmaceutical Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
3Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
4Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA | ||
5Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
6Nanotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
7Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Objective(s): Bromelain, a mixture of proteolytic enzymes from pineapple (Ananas comosus) is known as a potential debriding agent in burn treatment. In this research, the debridement efficiency of chitosan hydrogel loaded by sodium alginate-chitosan nanoparticles (NPs) containing bromelain (Br 10%-AG-CS NPs) was evaluated in animal models. Materials and Methods: The NPs were prepared using the ionic gelation technique and their properties were identified. Then, the debridement effect of bromelain NPs incorporated into chitosan hydrogel was evaluated 4 hr after wound treatment in animal models. Results: The particle size of positively charged Br-AG-Cs NPs was about 390±25 nm. The encapsulation efficiency of bromelain into AG-CS NPs was about 92%. The in vitro release profile showed that the maximum release of bromelain from NPs occurred during the first 4 hr (70%). The hydrogel structure did not significantly affect the profile release of bromelain in the formulation. After 6 months of storage at 4 and 25 °C, the synthesized NPs indicated no significant changes in bromelain activity. It was found that Br 10%-Ag-Cs NPs-CS hydrogel had the most beneficial effects on reducing necrotic tissues and resulted in re-epithelialization compared with other treated groups (negative and positive control, CS hydrogel, and Br 10%-CS hydrogel). Conclusion: Therefore, using this novel formulation can be considered a potential debridement agent. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Bromelain؛ Chitosan؛ Debridement؛ Nanoparticles؛ Sodium alginate | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Evdokiou A, O Kanisicak, S Gierek, A Barry, MJ Ivey, X Zhang, et al. Characterization of Burn Eschar Pericytes. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 606-628. 2. Cinat ME and Smith MM. Acute burn management. Achauer and Sood’s Burn Surgery Reconstruction and rehabilitation, Philadelphia: Saunders 2006; 1: 50-76. 3. Hirche C, Citterio A, Hoeksema H, Koller J, Lehner M, Martinez JR, et al. Eschar removal by bromelain based enzymatic debridement (Nexobrid®) in burns: An European consensus. Burns 2017; 43: 1640-1653. 4. Rosenberg L, Krieger Y, Bogdanov-Berezovski A, Silberstein E, Shoham Y, and Singer AJ. A novel rapid and selective enzymatic debridement agent for burn wound management: a multi-center RCT. Burns 2014; 40: 466-474. 5. Singer AJ, Taira BR, Anderson R, McClain SA, and Rosenberg L. Reepithelialization of mid-dermal porcine burns after rapid enzymatic debridement with Debrase®. J Burn Care Res 2011; 32: 647-653. 6. Singer AJ, McClain SA, Taira BR, Rooney J, Steinhauff N, Rosenberg L. Rapid and selective enzymatic debridement of porcine comb burns with bromelain-derived Debrase®: acute-phase preservation of noninjured tissue and zone of stasis. J Burn Care Res 2010; 31: 304-309. 7. Silvestre MPC, Carreira RL, Silva MR, Corgosinho FC, Monteiro MRP, Morais HA. Effect of pH and temperature on the activity of enzymatic extracts from pineapple peel. Food Bioproc Tech 2012; 5: 1824-1831. 8. Ataide JA, Gérios EF, Mazzola PG, Sout EB., Bromelain-loaded nanoparticles: A comprehensive review of the state of the art. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2018; 254: 48-55. 9. Schulz A, Fuchs PC, Oplaender C, Valdez LB, Schiefer JL. Effect of Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement on Skin Cells. J Burn Care Res 2018; 39: 527-535. 10. Bayat S, Amiri N, Pishavar E, Kalalinia F, Movaffagh J, Hahsemi M. Bromelain-loaded chitosan nanofibers prepared by electrospinning method for burn wound healing in animal models. Life Sci 2019; 229: 57-66. 11. Wang W, Lu K-j, Yu C-h, Huang Q-l, DuY -Z. Nano-drug delivery systems in wound treatment and skin regeneration. J Nanobiotechnology 2019 ;17:82. 12. Du J and Wong KK, Nanomaterials for Wound Healing: Scope and Advances, in Theranostic Bionanomaterials. 2019, Elsevier. p. 211-230. 13. El-Feky GS, Banna ST El-, El-Bahy GS, Abdelrazek E, Kamal M. Alginate coated chitosan nanogel for the controlled topical delivery of Silver sulfadiazine. Carbohydr Polym 2017; 177: 194-202. 14. Ataide JA, Cefali LC, Rebelo MA, Spir LG, Tambourgi EB, Jozala AF, et al. Bromelain Loading and Release from a Hydrogel Formulated Using Alginate and Arabic Gum. Planta Med 2017; 83: 870-876. 15. Choukaife H, Doolaanea AA, Alfatama M. Alginate nanoformulation: Influence of process and selected variables. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2020; 13:335. 16. Kim HS, Sun X, LeeJ -H, Kim H-W, Fu X, Leong KW. Advanced drug delivery systems and artificial skin grafts for skin wound healing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2019; 146: 209-239. 17. Ji M, Sun X, Guo X, Zhu W, Wu J, Chen L, et al. Green synthesis, characterization and in vitro release of cinnamaldehyde/sodium alginate/chitosan nanoparticles. Food Hydrocoll 2019; 90: 515-522. 18. Liu H, Wang C, Li C, Qin Y, Wang Z, Yang F, et al. A functional chitosan-based hydrogel as a wound dressing and drug delivery system in the treatment of wound healing. RSC Adv 2018; 8: 7533-7549. 19. Grebinişan D, Holban M, Şunel V, Popa M, Desbrieres J, Lionte C. Novel acyl derivatives of N-(p-aminobenzoyl)-L-glutamine encapsulated in polymeric nanocapsules with potential antitumoral activity. Cellul Chem Technol 2011; 45: 571-577. 20. Li P, Dai Y-N, Zhang J-P, Wang A-Q, and Wei Q. Chitosan-alginate nanoparticles as a novel drug delivery system for nifedipine. Int J Biomed Sci 2008; 4:221-228. 21. Dubey R, Reddy S, Murthy N. Optimization of activity of bromelain. Asian J Chem 2012. 24: 1429-1431. 22. Mudshinge SR, Deore AB, Patil S, Bhalgat CM. Nanoparticles: emerging carriers for drug delivery. Saudi Pharm J 2011;19: 129-141. 23. Demetzos C and Pippa N. Advanced drug delivery nanosystems (aDDnSs): a mini-review. Drug deliv 2014; 21: 250-257. 24. Siafaka PI, Ustundag Okur N, Karavas E, Bikiaris DN. Surface Modified Multifunctional and Stimuli Responsive Nanoparticles for Drug Targeting: Current Status and Uses. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17:1440. 25. Aderibigbe BA and Buyana B. Alginate in wound dressings. Pharmaceutics 2018; 10: 42-60. 26. Szekalska M, Puciłowska A, Szymańska E, Ciosek P, Winnicka K, Alginate: current use and future perspectives in pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Int J Polym Sci 2016; 8: 1-17. 27. Nagpal K, Singh SK, Mishra DN. Chitosan nanoparticles: a promising system in novel drug delivery. Chem Pharm Bull 2010; 58: 1423-1430. 28. Charernsriwilaiwat N, Rojanarata T, Ngawhirunpat T, Opanasopit P. Electrospun chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol nanofibre mats for wound healing. Int Wound J 2014; 11: 215-222. 29. Hamidi M, Azadi A, Rafiei P. Hydrogel nanoparticles in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008; 60: 1638-1649. 30. Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE, Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine. 2004: Elsevier. 31. Rachmawati H, Sulastri E, Immaculata Iwo M, Safitri D, Rahma A. Bromelain Encapsulated in Self Assembly Nanoemulsion Exhibits Better Debridement Effect in Animal Model of Burned Skin. J Nano Res 2016; 40: 158-166. 32. Shoham Y, Krieger Y, Tamir E, Silberstein E, Bogdanov‐Berezovsky A, Haik J, et al. Bromelain‐based enzymatic debridement of chronic wounds: A preliminary report. Int Wound J.2018. 15: 769-775. 33. Honardar S, Kordestani S, Daliri M, NayebHabib F. The effect of chitosan-based gel on second degree burn wounds. J Wound Care 2016; 25: 488-494. 34. Sorasitthiyanukarn FN, Muangnoi C, Bhuket PRN, Rojsitthisak P, Rojsitthisak P. Chitosan/alginate nanoparticles as a promising approach for oral delivery of curcumin diglutaric acid for cancer treatment. Mater Sci Eng C 2018; 93: 178-190. 35. Motwani SK, Chopra S, Talegaonkar S, Kohli K, Ahmad FJ, Khar RK. Chitosan–sodium alginate nanoparticles as submicroscopic reservoirs for ocular delivery: Formulation, optimisation and in vitro characterisation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008; 68: 513-525. 36. Panyam J and Labhasetwar V, Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to cells and tissue. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2003; 55: 329-347. 37. Liu X, Shen B, Shen C, Zhong R, Wang X, Yuan H. Nanoparticle-loaded gels for topical delivery of nitrofurazone: effect of particle size on skin permeation and retention. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2018; 45: 367-372. 38. Mahmoud AA, El-Feky GS, Kamel R, Awad GE. Chitosan/sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin nanoparticles as a potential approach for ocular drug delivery. Int J Pharm 2011; 413: 229-236. 39. Hoffmann F, Cinatl J, Kabičková H, Kreuter J, Stieneker F. Preparation, characterization and cytotoxicity of methylmethacrylate copolymer nanoparticles with a permanent positive surface charge. Int J Pharm 1997; 157: 189-198. 40. Kim JH, Kim YS, Kim S, Park JH, Kim K, Choi K, et al. Hydrophobically modified glycol chitosan nanoparticles as carriers for paclitaxel. J Control Release 2006; 111: 228-234. 41. Pal K, Paulson AT, Rousseau D, Biopolymers in controlled-release delivery systems, In book: Modern Biopolymer Science 2009, Elsevier. p. 519-557. 42. Bhatnagar P, Pant AB, Shukla Y, Chaudhari B, Kumar P, Gupta KC. Bromelain nanoparticles protect against 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene induced skin carcinogenesis in mouse model. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2015; 91: 35-46. 43. Percival SL, McCarty S, Hunt JA, Woods EJ. The effects of pH on wound healing, biofilms, and antimicrobial efficacy. Wound Repair Regen 2014; 22: 174-186. 44. Amid A, Ismail NA, Yusof F, Salleh HM. Expression, purification, and characterization of a recombinant stem bromelain from Ananas comosus. Process Biochem 2011; 46: 2232-2239. 45. Rosenberg L, Krieger Y, Silberstein E, Arnon O, Sinelnikov IA, Bogdanov-Berezovsky A, et al. Selectivity of a bromelain based enzymatic debridement agent: a porcine study. Burns 2012; 38: 1035-1040. 46. NexoBrid | European Medicines Agency. Assessment report. Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/002246. 2012. 47. Hirche C, Almeland SK, Dheansa B, Fuchs P, Governa M, Hoeksema H, et al. Eschar removal by bromelain based enzymatic debridement (Nexobrid®) in burns: European consensus guidelines update. Burns 2020; 46: 782-796. 48. Gunde M and AmnerNar N. An Investigation on Burn Wound Healing in Rats with Chitosan gel Formulation containing Plant Enzymes. Burns 2006; 32: 319-327. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 881 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 563 |