سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

UCPUNAR, Hanifi, CAMURCU, Yalkin, BUYUK, Abdul, AYDIN, Abdurrahman, TAS, Suleyman, SAHIN, Vedat. (1400). Comparison of Contemporary Surgical Indications for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty between 2005–2011 and 2012–2017 in a Referral Center. , 10(1), 32-37. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2021.47457.2326
Hanifi UCPUNAR; Yalkin CAMURCU; Abdul Fettah BUYUK; Abdurrahman AYDIN; Suleyman Kasım TAS; Vedat SAHIN. "Comparison of Contemporary Surgical Indications for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty between 2005–2011 and 2012–2017 in a Referral Center". , 10, 1, 1400, 32-37. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2021.47457.2326
UCPUNAR, Hanifi, CAMURCU, Yalkin, BUYUK, Abdul, AYDIN, Abdurrahman, TAS, Suleyman, SAHIN, Vedat. (1400). 'Comparison of Contemporary Surgical Indications for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty between 2005–2011 and 2012–2017 in a Referral Center', , 10(1), pp. 32-37. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2021.47457.2326
UCPUNAR, Hanifi, CAMURCU, Yalkin, BUYUK, Abdul, AYDIN, Abdurrahman, TAS, Suleyman, SAHIN, Vedat. Comparison of Contemporary Surgical Indications for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty between 2005–2011 and 2012–2017 in a Referral Center. , 1400; 10(1): 32-37. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2021.47457.2326

Comparison of Contemporary Surgical Indications for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty between 2005–2011 and 2012–2017 in a Referral Center

The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
مقاله 5، دوره 10، شماره 1، فروردین 2022، صفحه 32-37    اصل مقاله (727.15 K)
نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2021.47457.2326
نویسندگان
Hanifi UCPUNAR* 1؛ Yalkin CAMURCU1؛ Abdul Fettah BUYUK2؛ Abdurrahman AYDIN2؛ Suleyman Kasım TAS2؛ Vedat SAHIN1
1Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Erzincan University Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan, Turkey
22Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Baltalimani Bone and Joint Diseases Education and Research Hospital, Turkey
چکیده
Background: Different causative factors for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgeries are elucidated in the arthroplasty registry data of different countries and the patient records at tertiary care centers. We aimed to determine the changes in the causes for revision TKAs before and after 2011 (The year that the Musculoskeletal Infection Society proposed a new definition for periprosthetic joint infection) and the changes in the demographics of patients who underwent revision TKAs during the same time intervals. Methods: Patients who underwent revision TKAs between 2004 and 2017 were evaluated. A total of 291 patients operated before (period 1, n = 139) and after (period 2, n = 152) 2011 were included, while 53 patients with inconclusive diagnoses were excluded. The demographic data of patients and the causes for revision TKAs were collected and compared between the two periods. Results: Infection was the most common cause of revision TKAs during periods 1 (58%) and 2 (48%). Aseptic loosening (46%) and infection (37%) were the 2 most common causes for late revisions during period 2. Aseptic loosening almost doubled during period 2 compared with that in period 1. Age, sex, and body mass index distribution in patients were similar across both the periods. Conclusion: Although the incidence of aseptic loosening has significantly increased since 2011, infection is still the most common cause for revision knee arthroplasty surgery. Level of evidence: III
کلیدواژه‌ها
Revision knee arthroplasty؛ Periprosthetic joint infection؛ Aseptic loosening
مراجع
  1. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, Mowat F, Saleh K, Dybvik E, et al. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(3):144-151.
    2. Ceyhan E, Gursoy S, Akkaya M, Ugurlu M, Koksal I, Bozkurt M. Toward the Turkish national registry system: aprevalence study of total knee arthroplasty in Turkey. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31:1878–84.
    3. Cram P, Lu X, Kates SL, Singh JA, Li Y, Wolf BR. Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010. JAMA. 2012;308(12):1227‐1236.
    4. Dyrhovden GS, Lygre SHL, Badawy M, Gøthesen Ø, Furnes O. Have the causes of revision for total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties changed during the past two decades? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475:1874–86
    5. Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP, Glyn-Jones S, Prieto-Alhambra D, Judge A, et al. The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 2017(8); 389(10077):1424-1430
    6. Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today-has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty2014; 29(9):1774-8.
    7. Lum ZC, Shieh AK, Dorr LD. Why total knees fail-A modern perspective review. World J Orthop 2018(18); 9(4):60-64.
    8. Schroer WC, Berend KR, Lombardi A V., Barnes CL, Bolognesi MP, Berend ME, et al. Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28(8 Suppl):116-9.
    9. Hossain F, Patel S, Haddad FS. Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(5):1221-8.
    10. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, et al. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res., 2010; 476(10):1951-1960.
    11. Lombardi A V., Berend KR, Adams JB. Why knee replacements fail in 2013: Patient, surgeon, or implant? Bone Joint J. 2014; 96:101-4.
    12. Niinimäki TT. The reasons for knee arthroplasty revisions are incomparable in
    the different arthroplasty registries. Knee. 2015; 22(2):142-4.
13. Greidanus N V., Peterson RC, Masri BA, Garbuz DS. Quality of life outcomes in revision versus primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26(4):615-20.
14. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Della Valle CJ, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(11):2992-2994.
15. Moreland JR. Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988:49–64.
16. Rand JA, Bryan RS. Revision after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North
Am. 1982; 13(1):201-12.
17. Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total
knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 392:315-8.
18. Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Scully S, Callaghan JJ, Saleh KJ. Current etiologies and modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 446:45-50.
19. Schroer WC, Berend KR, Lombardi A V., Barnes CL, Bolognesi MP, Berend ME, et al. Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28:116–9.
20. Delanois RE, Mistry JB, Gwam CU, Mohamed NS, Choksi US, Mont MA. Current epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32(9):2663-2668.
21. Kasahara Y, Majima T, Kimura S, Nishiike O, Uchida J. What are the causes of revision total knee arthroplasty in Japan? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471(5):1533-8.
22. Koh IJ, Cho WS, Choi NY, Kim TK. Causes, risk factors, and trends in failures after TKA in Korea over the past 5 years: A multicenter study knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472(1):316-26.
23. Shahi A, Parvizi J. Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015;3(2):72-81.
24. Koh CK, Zeng I, Ravi S, Zhu M, Vince KG, Young SW. Periprosthetic joint infection is the main cause of failure for modern knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 11,134 knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475: 2194–201.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 642
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 428