Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repairs Using All-Suture Anchors as Medial Row Anchors | ||
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
مقاله 8، دوره 9، شماره 5، آذر و دی 2021، صفحه 527-535 اصل مقاله (685.77 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2021.52827.2654 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Kashif A. Memon1؛ Richard Dimock1؛ Alessio Bernasconi2؛ Anshul Sobti3؛ Paolo Consigliere3؛ Mohamed A. Imam4؛ A. Ali Narvani* 5 | ||
1Rowley Bristow Unit, Ashford and St Peter’s NHS Trust, Chertsey, United Kingdom | ||
2Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, University “Federico II” of Naples, Naples, Italy | ||
3The Reading Shoulder Unit, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, Berkshire, England | ||
41 Rowley Bristow Unit, Ashford and St Peter’s NHS Trust, Chertsey, United Kingdom- 5 Smart Health Academic Unit, University of East London, London UK | ||
51 Rowley Bristow Unit, Ashford and St Peter’s NHS Trust, Chertsey, United Kingdom 2 Fortius Clinic, London, England | ||
چکیده | ||
Background: The aim of our study is to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of a series of prospectively enrolled patients who have had double-row transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repairs, where all-suture anchors were used as medial-row anchors, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Methods: Twenty-two consecutive patients underwent arthroscopic transosseous equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair using all-suture anchors as medial-row anchors. Oxford Shoulder Score, Constant Score and Visual Analogue Scale pain score, together with shoulder range of motion, were used preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months and final follow-up. Radiological evaluation was performed with magnetic resonance imaging at one-year post surgery to assess the structural integrity of the repair and the rate of cyst formation in greater tuberosity. Results: The patient mean age was 61 years (range 46-75). Minimum follow-up was 1 year, and the mean final follow-up was 15 months (range 12-24). Healing failure in our patients was less than 5% (1/22 patients). There were significant improvements in shoulder function outcome scores at final follow-up. The Constant and Oxford scores were 78 and 44 at final follow-up respectively. There were similar magnitudes of improvement in range of motion (combined abduction and rotation), pain score and supraspinatus strength at final follow up. The improvements in outcome scores were already statistically significant at 3 months (p <.001). Using Kim’s classification for cyst formation on T2-weighted MRI images, we observed no fluid or minimal fluid collection in 85% of the patients (17/22 patients). There were no correlations between the grade of bone changes and the clinical outcomes. Conclusion: It is safe to use all-suture anchors as medial-row anchors when performing double-row anchor transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repairs. The purported advantages of all-suture anchors may outweigh their perceived disadvantages in rotator cuff repair surgery. Level of evidence: IV | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
All-suture anchors؛ Clinical outcome؛ Healing rates؛ Rotator cuff repair | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Narvani AA, Imam MA, Polyzois I, Sarkhel T, Gupta R, Levy O, et al. The “pull-over” technique for all arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with extracellular matrix augmentation. Arthroscopy techniques. 2017; 6(3):e679-87. 2. Pandey. V, Willems. W.J. Rotator cuff tear: A detailed update. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2015; 2(1): 1–14 3. Narvani AA, Consigliere P, Polyzois I, Sarkhel T, Gupta R, Levy O. The “Pull-Over” Technique for Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2016 ;5(6): e1441–e1447. 4. Consigliere P, Polyzois I, Sarkhel T, Gupta R, Levy O, Narvani AA. Preliminary, Results of a Consecutive Series of Large & Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Treated with Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs Augmented with Extracellular Matrix. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017 ;5(1) :14‐21. 5. Denard PJ, Burkhart SS. The evolution of suture anchors in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(9):1589‐1595. 6. Consigliere P, Salamat S, Kader N, Imam M, Gowda A, Narvani AA. The X-Pulley. Technique for Subpectoral Long Head of the Biceps Tenodesis Using All-Suture Anchors. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 ;8(2): e189–e197 7. Consigliere P, Morrissey N, Imam M, Narvani AA. The Tripod-Pulley Technique for Arthroscopic Remplissage in Engaging Hill-Sachs Lesions. Arthrosc Tech. 2017 ;6(5): e1675–e1684 8. Dimock RAC, Kontoghiorghe C, Consigliere P, Salamat S, Imam MA, Narvani AA. Distal Triceps Rupture Repair: The Triceps Pulley-Pullover Technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 ;8(1): e85–e91 9. Outerbridge RE. The Etiology of Chondromalacia Patellae. 1961. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(389) :5-8. 10. Goschka AM, Hafer JS, Reynolds KA. Biomechanical Comparison of Traditional Anchors to All-Suture Anchors in a Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Cadaver Model Clin Boimech (Bristol, Avon). 2015;30(8) :808-13 11. Brolin TJ, Updegrove GF, Horneff JG. Classifications in Brief : Hamada Classification of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475(11): 2819–2823 12. Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Holder J, Gerber C. Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: Assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg .1999;8(6):599-605 13. Cofield RH. Subscapular muscle transposition for repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics. 1982; 154(5):667-72. 14. Narvani AA , Imam MA , Godenèche A, Calvo E, Corbett S , Wallace AL, et al. Degenerative Rotator Cuff Tear, Repair or Not Repair? A Review of Current Evidence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020;102(4) :248-255 15. Kim S H, Kim D Y, Kwon J E, Park J S , Oh J H. Perianchor Cyst Formation Around Biocomposite Biodegradable Suture Anchors After Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(12):2907-12 16. Sgaglione NA. Editorial Commentary: Shoulder Repair All-Suture Fixators: Anchors Away or Tell Us Why Not? Arthroscopy.2019.35(5):1359-61. 17. Van Den Bracht H, Van den Langenbergh T , Pouillon M , Verhasselt S , Verniers P, Stoffelen D. Rotator Cuff Repair with All-Suture Anchors: A Midterm Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Repair Integrity and Cyst Formation J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27(11):2006-2012. 18. Imam MA, Abdelkafy A. Out Comes following arthroscopic transosseous equivalent suture bridge double row rotator cuff repair: a prospective study and short-term results SICOT J. 2016; 2:7. 19. Koh. K. H, Kang. K.C, Lim. T. K, Shon. M.S, Yoo . J.C. Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Single- Versus Double-Row Suture Anchor Repair in 2- To 4-cm Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results Arthroscopy 2011;27(4):453-62. 20. Pfeiffer. FM, Smith MJ, Cook JL, Kuroki K. The Histologic and Biomechanical Response of Two Commercially Available Small Glenoid Anchors for Use in Labral Repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(8) :1156- 21. Ro K. Peri anchor Cyst Formation After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using All-Suture-Type, Bioabsorbable-Type, and PEEK-Type Anchors. Arthroscopy. 2019 ;35(8) :2284-92. 22. Dhinsa BS, Bhamra JS, Aramberri-Gutierrez M, Kochhar T, Mid-term clinical outcome following rotator cuff repair using all-suture anchors. J of clinic orthop Trauma. 2018, p241–243 23. Hughes A, Even T, Narvani AA, Atoun E, Van Tongel A, Sforza G, et al. Pattern and time phase of shoulder function and power recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2012; 21(10):1299-303. 24. Visscher LE, Jeffery C, Gilmour T, Anderson L, Couzens G. The History of Suture Anchors in Orthopaedic Surgery. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2019;61 :71-8 25. Kilinc AS, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Lafosse L. Subacromial internal spacer for rotator cuff tendon repair:“the balloon technique”. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2009 1;25(8):921-4 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,095 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 755 |