Anterior Bridge Plate Osteosynthesis in Comminuted Fracture Shaft of Humerus in Manual Workers- is it Optimum Choice? | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 9، شماره 6، بهمن 2021، صفحه 702-707 اصل مقاله (779.92 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2021.52287.2579 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Pankaj Mishra1؛ Maneesh Verma* 2؛ Rahul Verma3 | ||
| 1Department of orthopaedics All India institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal M.P India | ||
| 2Department of orthopaedics Government medical college Datia M.P India | ||
| 3Department of orthopaedics Gandhi medical college Bhopal M.P India | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Bridge plate osteosynthesis of fractures by minimal invasion and near acceptable reduction is becoming popular and acceptable entity. Management of humeral shaft fracture has evolved a lot with their pros and cons. Anterior bridge plate osteosynthesis (ABPO) for humeral shaft fracture is pertinent to a minimal invasive procedure, and it has evolved as a new entrant in the surgical techniques. This study was designed to carry out the results and efficacy of ABPO in the comminuted fracture shaft of the humerus in the manual workers. Methods: Study included the closed comminuted fracture of shaft of humerus in skeletally mature patients engaged predominantly in manual works, like overhead sports activity, laborers, and industrial workers. All fractures were managed by either 4.5-mm narrow locking compression plate (LCP) or dynamic compression plate (DCP).The functional outcome for elbow was measured by Mayo's elbow performance score (MEPS) and functional outcome of shoulder was measured by UCLA (University of California at Los Angeles) shoulder score system. Results: In this study 37 patients were enrolled. Mean duration for satisfactory radiographic union was 12.3 weeks. The mean duration of follow-up period was 14.5 months. In respect to elbow function, the average Mayo elbow score was 92.42 ±2.17 and average UCLA score of shoulder function was 34 ±0.34. Conclusion: The ABPO is an optimum choice for managing the comminuted fracture shaft of humerus in manual labors. The outcomes are favorable and reproducible with very few risks. Level of evidence: IV | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Humerus؛ Fractures؛ Comminuted | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1- Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, Latta LL, Capps CA. Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(4):478-86. 2- Chao TC, Chou WY, Chung JC, Hsu CJ. Humeral shaft fractures treated by dynamic compression plates, Ender nails and interlocking nails. Int Orthop. 2005; 29(2):88-91. 3- Seroyer ST, Nho SJ, Bach BR, Bush-Joseph CA, Nicholson GP, Romeo AA. The kinetic chain in overhand pitching: its potential role for performance enhancement and injury prevention. Sports Health. 2010; 2(2):135-46. 4- Jiang R, Luo CF, Zeng BF, Mei GH. Minimally invasive plating for complex humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007; 127(7):531-5. 5- Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation. 4th ed. Springler-Verlog; New York: 1991. pp. 118–120. 6- Morrey BF, An KN, Chao EYS. The Elbow and Its Disorders. 2nd edition. Philadelphia, Pa, USA: WB Saunders; 1993. Functional evaluation of the elbow; pp. 86–89. 7- Ellman H, Hanker G, Bayer M. Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986; 68(8):1136-44. 8- Wang C, Li J, Li Y, Dai G, Wang M. Is minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fracture advantageous compared with the conventional open technique? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24(11):1741-8. 9- Krettek C, Miclau T, Grun O, Schandelmaier P, Tscherne H. Intraoperative control of axes, rotation and length in femoral and tibial fractures: technical note. Injury. 1998; 29 Suppl 3:C29-39. 10- Hunter J. In: Collected works. Palmer JF, editor. $4. London: Longman Rees; 1837. 11- Kloen P. AO manual of fracture management: internal fixators; concepts and cases using LCP and LISS. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Traumatologie. 2008 Feb;16(1):31 12- Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH. Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop. 2006; 77(2):279-84. 13- Kurup H, Hossain M, Andrew JG. Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 ;( 6):CD005959. 14- Esmailiejah AA, Abbasian MR, Safdari F, Ashoori K. Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures: Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation. Trauma Mon. 2015; 20(3):e26271. 15- Breederveld RS, Patka P, van Mourik JC. Refractures of the femoral shaft. Neth J Surg. 1985; 37(4):114-6 16- Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(8):1093-110. 17- Changulani M, Jain UK, Keswani T. Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A randomised controlled study. Int Orthop. 2007; 31(3):391-395. 18- O'Toole RV, Andersen RC, Vesnovsky O, Alexander M, Topoleski LD, Nascone JW, et al. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22(10):709-15. 19 – Davis C, Stall A, Knutsen E, Whitney A, Becker E, Hsieh AH, et al. Locking plates in osteoporosis: a biomechanical cadaveric study of diaphyseal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012; 26(4):216-21. 20- Ziran BH, Belangero W, Livani B, Pesantez R. Percutaneous plating of the humerus with locked plating: technique and case report. J Trauma. 2007; 63(1):205-10. 21- Apivatthakul T, Patiyasikan S, Luevitoonvechkit S. Danger zone for locking screw placement in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of humeral shaft fractures: A cadaveric study. Int J Care Injured. 2010; 41(2):169–72. 22- Livani B, Belangero W, Andrade K, Zuiani G, Pratali R. Is MIPO in humeral shaft fractures really safe. Postoperative ultrasonographic evaluation? Int Orthop. 2009; 33(6):1719–23. 23- Shetty MS, Kumar MA, Sujay K, Kini AR, Kanthi KG. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humerus diaphyseal fractures. Indian J Orthop. 2011; 45(6):520-526. 24- Dabezies EJ, Banta CJ 2nd, Murphy CP, d'Ambrosia RD. Plate fixation of the humeral shaft for acute fractures, with and without radial nerve injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 1992; 6(1):10-3. 25- Zhiquan A, Bingfang Z, Yeming W, Chi Z, Peiyan H. Minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis (MIPO) of middle and distal third humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2007; 21(9):628-33. 26- Mahajan AS, Kim YG, Kim JH, D’sa P, Lakhani A, Ok HS. Is Anterior Bridge Plating For Mid-Shaft Humeral Fractures A Suitable Option For Patients Predominantly Involved In Overhead Activities? A Functional Outcome Study In Athletes And Manual Laborers. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016; 8(4):358–66. 27- Niall DM, O'Mahony J, McElwain JP. Plating of humeral shaft fractures--has the pendulum swung back? Injury. 2004; 35(6):580-6 28- Jawa A, McCarty P, Doornberg J, Harris M, Ring D. Extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A comparison of functional bracing and plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(11):2343-7. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 655 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 563 |
||