Glenoid Radiolucent Lines in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty are Unaffected by Thrombin Glenoid Preparation | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 9، شماره 5، آذر و دی 2021، صفحه 543-547 اصل مقاله (429.12 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2020.47033.2297 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Jason C. Ho1؛ Liam T. Kane1؛ Bernardo Nunes2؛ Gerald R. Williams1؛ Joseph A. Abboud1؛ Surena Namdari* 1 | ||
| 1Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA | ||
| 2Sao João University Hospital, Porto, Portugal | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Modern glenoid cementing techniques for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty has improved the ability to achieve a stable cement mantle, but the efficacy of adjunctive agents in glenoid preparation is unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare the early radiolucency rate s of glenoids prepared with and without thrombin. Methods: We identified patients between January 2017 and February 2019 undergoing primary anatomic TSA using two glenoid types. Group A glenoids had a cemented central peg without peripheral peg cementation, and Group B glenoids had cemented peripheral pegs without central peg cementation. The first postoperative radiograph was assessed for radiolucent lines. All patients had the same glenoid preparation except some had the addition of thrombin as a preparation agent. Results: We identified 83 Group A glenoids with and 63 without thrombin glenoid preparation, and109 Group B glenoids with and 48 without thrombin preparation. All Group A glenoids had no radiolucent lines and 5 (3%) Group B glenoids had radiolucent lines. Use of thrombin showed no difference in early radiolucencies (p=1.00) in either Group. Conclusion: The addition of thrombin as a preparation agent had no effect on early glenoid radiolucent lines in anatomic TSA, and its routine use should be reconsidered. Level of evidence: III | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty؛ Glenoid Preparation؛ Glenoid Loosening؛ Glenoid Radiolucency؛ Thrombin | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Denard PJ, Raiss P, Sowa B, Walch G. Mid- to long-term follow-up of total shoulder arthroplasty using a keeled glenoid in young adults with primary glenohumeral arthritis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013 Jul;22(7):894–900. 2. McLendon PB, Schoch BS, Sperling JW, Sánchez-Sotelo J, Schleck CD, Cofield RH. Survival of the pegged glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty: part II. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017;26(8). 3. Norris BL, Lachiewicz PF. Modern cement technique and the survivorship of total shoulder arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1996 Jul;328(328):76–85. 4. Lazarus MD, Jensen KL, Southworth C, Matsen 3rd FA. The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Jul;84-A(7):1174–82. 5. Yian EH, Werner CML, Nyffeler RW, Pfirrmann CW, Ramappa A, Sukthankar A, et al. Radiographic and computed tomography analysis of cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87(9):1928–36. 6. Ho JC, Sabesan VJ, Iannotti JP. Glenoid component retroversion is associated with osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 19;95(12):e82. 7. Walch G, Moraga C, Young A, Castellanos-Rosas J. Results of anatomic nonconstrained prosthesis in primary osteoarthritis with biconcave glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Nov;21(11):1526–33. 8. Hasan SS, Leith JM, Campbell B, Kapil R, Smith KL, Matsen FA. Characteristics of unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 11(5):431–41. 9. Klepps S, Chiang AS, Miller S, Jiang CY, Hazrati Y, Flatow EL. Incidence of early radiolucent glenoid lines in patients having total shoulder replacements. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2005 Jun;NA;(435):118–25. 10. Torchia ME, Cofield RH, Settergren CR. Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997 Dec;6(6):495–505. 11. Choi T, Horodyski M, Struk AM, Sahajpal DT, Wright TW. Incidence of early radiolucent lines after glenoid component insertion for total shoulder arthroplasty: a radiographic study comparing pressurized and unpressurized cementing techniques. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2013 Mar;22(3):403–8. 12. Gross RM, High R, Apker K, Haggstrom J, Fehringer JA, Stephan J. Vacuum assist glenoid fixation: does this technique lead to a more durable glenoid component? Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2011 Oct;20(7):1050–60. 13. Halawa M, Lee AJ, Ling RS, Vangala SS. The shear strength of trabecular bone from the femur, and some factors affecting the shear strength of the cementbone interface. Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall- Chirurgie. 1978 Aug 11;92(1):19–30. 14. Majkowski RS, Miles AW, Bannister GC, Perkins J, Taylor GJ. Bone surface preparation in cemented joint replacement. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 1993 May;75(3):459–63. 15. Ackland DC, Yap V, Ackland ML, Williams JF, de Steiger R. Pulse-Lavage Brushing Followed by Hydrogen Peroxide-Gauze Packing for Bone-Bed Preparation in Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Bovine Model. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery. 2009 Dec 1;17(3):296–300. 16. Edwards TB, Sabonghy EP, Elkousy H, Warnock KM, Hammerman SM, O’Connor DP, et al. Glenoid component insertion in total shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of three techniques for drying the glenoid before cementation. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2007 May;16(3 Suppl):S107-10. 17. Howells RJ, Salmon JM, McCullough KG. The effect of irrigating solutions on the strength of the cementbone interface. The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery. 1992 Mar;62(3):215–8. 18. Cheng CM, Meyer-Massetti C, Kayser SR. A review of three stand-alone topical thrombins for surgical hemostasis. Clinical Therapeutics. 2009 Jan;31(1):32–41. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 523 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 435 |
||