Deep Infection after Distal Radius Open-reduction Internal Fixation: A Case Series | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 9، شماره 4، مهر و آبان 2021، صفحه 427-431 اصل مقاله (460.32 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2020.52635.2603 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Tyler W. Henry1؛ Richard M. McEntee2؛ Jonas L. Matzon2؛ Pedro K. Beredjiklian2؛ Kevin F. Lutsky* 2 | ||
| 1Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA | ||
| 2Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Given its low incidence, the management of deep infection following distal radius open-reduction internal fixation (ORIF) has not been well reported. In an effort to expand our current understanding, the purpose of this case series is to present the treatment strategies and functional outcomes associated with deep infection after distal radius ORIF. Methods: All patients with deep infections after distal radius ORIF over a ten-year period were identified and their treatment courses asessed. Results: The cohort consisted of three women and one man with an average age of 55.5 ± 17.6 years. Mean time from infection presentation to irrigation and debridement (I&D) with removal of hardware (ROH) was 16 days (Range: 3 – 44 days). The identified bacterial species in all cases was Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA = 2, MSSA = 2). Three patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics, while one patient was treated with oral antibiotics. Mean time from infection presentation to final clinical follow-up was 11 months (Range: 3 – 20 months). Two patients required repeat I&D. A clinical determination of successful infection eradication was made in all cases. Conclusion: The reported rate of deep infection after distal radius ORIF is less than 1%. There is no well-defined treatment algorithm for patients with deep infection after distal radius ORIF. However, removal of hardware and postoperative oral or intravenous antibiotic therapy appears effective, and is consistent with the standard practices of treating infection after other orthopaedic surgeries. Level of evidence: IV | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Distal radius؛ Infection؛ Open-reduction internal fixation؛ Treatment | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Chaudhry H, Kleinlugtenbelt YV, Mundi R, Ristevski B, Goslings JC, Bhandari M. Are Volar Locking Plates Superior to Percutaneous K-wires for Distal Radius Fractures? A Meta-analysis. Clin Orthop. 2015; 473(9):3017–27. 2. Zong S-L, Kan S-L, Su L-X, Wang B. Meta-analysis for dorsally displaced distal radius fracture fixation: volar locking plate versus percutaneous Kirschner wires. J Orthop Surg. 2015; 10:108. 3. Iorio ML, Harper CM, Rozental TD. Open Distal Radius Fractures: Timing and Strategies for Surgical Management. Hand Clin. 2018; 34(1):33–40. 4. Margaliot Z, Haase SC, Kotsis SV, Kim HM, Chung KC. A meta-analysis of outcomes of external fixation versus plate osteosynthesis for unstable distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg. 2005; 30(6):1185–99. 5. Kuzyk PRT, Dhotar HS, Sternheim A, Gross AE, Safir O, Backstein D. Two-stage revision arthroplasty for management of chronic periprosthetic hip and knee infection: techniques, controversies, and outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014; 22(3):153–64. 6. Molina CS, Stinner DJ, Fras AR, Evans JM. Course of treatment and rate of successful salvage following the diagnosis of deep infection in patients treated for pilon fractures (AO/OTA: 43). J Orthop. 2015; 12(Suppl 1):S18–24. 7. Zalavras CG, Christensen T, Rigopoulos N, Holtom P, Patzakis MJ. Infection Following Operative Treatment of Ankle Fractures. Clin Orthop. 2009; 467(7):1715–20. 8. Li H-K, Rombach I, Zambellas R, Walker AS, McNally MA, Atkins BL, et al. Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(5):425–36. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 643 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 457 |
||