Is There any Difference in the Survival of Conversion TKA After Previous HTO In Compare to Previous UKA? Factors to be Considered When Offering a Surgery | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 9، شماره 4، مهر و آبان 2021، صفحه 368-370 اصل مقاله (269.65 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: EDITORIAL | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2020.52131.2575 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| E. Carlos RODRIGUEZ-MERCHAN* 1؛ Amir R. Kachooei2 | ||
| 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain | ||
| 2Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran - Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) are reliable treatments for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis, which are often indicated in relatively young and active patients. However, when the aforementioned surgical procedures fail or the osteoarthritis progresses, patients are offered conversion to the total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It has been recently published that a previous UKA more than doubles the risk of revision than a previous HTO. Although such study has some important limitations, the aforesaid risk must be taken into account when offering surgery to help patients contribute in shared-decision making. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| TKA؛ previous UKA؛ previous HTO؛ risk of revision | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Robertsson O, W-Dahl A. The risk of revision after TKA is affected by previous HTO or UKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(1):90-93. 2. El-Galaly A, Nielsen PT, Kappel A, Jensen SL. Reduced survival of total knee arthroplasty after previous unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with previous high tibial osteotomy: a propensity-score weighted mid-term cohort study based on 2,133 observations from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop. 2020;91(2):177-183. 3. El-Galaly A, Nielsen PT, Jensen SL, Kappel A. Prior high tibial osteotomy does not affect the survival of total knee arthroplasties: Results from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 4. Batailler C, Fary C, Denjean S, Gaillard T, Lustig S. High midterm survival rate of uncemented total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: A casecontrol study. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(6):1595-1599. 5. Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW. Optimal usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 41,986 cases from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J. 2015;97- B(11):1506-1511. 6. El-Galaly A, Kappel A, Nielsen PT, Jensen SL. Revision risk for total knee arthroplasty converted from medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Comparison with primary and revision arthroplasties, based on mid-term results from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(22):1999- 2006. 7. Sasaki E, Akimoto H, Iio K, Fujita Y, Saruga T, Kakizaki H, et al. Long-term survival rate of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy with high valgus correction: a 15-year follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jun 29. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020- 06128-9. Online ahead of print. 8. Koh IJ, Kim MS, Sohn S, Song KY, Choi NY, Jung H, et al. Predictive factors for satisfaction after contemporary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy in isolated medial femorotibial osteoarthritis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019; 105(1):77-83. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 623 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 441 |
||