The Surgical Treatment of Deep Infection in the Native Shoulder Joint | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 9، شماره 4، مهر و آبان 2021، صفحه 412-417 اصل مقاله (461.71 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2020.50100.2484 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Tyler W. Henry1؛ Michael Gutman2؛ Amy Backal2؛ Surena Namdari* 3 | ||
| 1Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA | ||
| 2Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA | ||
| 31 Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA 2 Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: The overall clinical picture surrounding native shoulder infections, and, in particular, the associated long-term functional outcomes of treatment are presently underreported. The purpose of this study is to examine the demographics, diagnostic and treatment strategies, and functional outcomes of isolated shoulder joint sepsis treated with surgical irrigation and debridement (I&D). Methods: All patients treated with I&D for native shoulder sepsis between 2007 – 2017 were identified. Those without a minimum of one-year follow-up were excluded. Functional outcomes scores, reoperations, and predictors of poor outcome were evaluated. Results: Twenty-three patients were included in the final study population. Mean age-adjusted CCI score was 4.1 (SD = 3.4, Range = 0 – 10). Twelve patients (52.2%) were treated with open I&D, while 11 patients (47.8%) were treated arthroscopically. Nine patients (39.1%) required multiple I&Ds (mean total number of I&Ds = 1.7, SD = 1.0, Range: 1 – 4). Five patients (21.7%) had at least one documented reinfection after their initial hospitalization, with the initial recurrence of infection occurring 2 – 15 months after the index procedure. Mean ASES score at final follow-up was 55.3 (SD = 26.7, Range: 5.8 – 98.3) and mean SANE score was 53.3 (SD = 30.6, Range: 0 – 100). Stepwise multiple linear regression modeling identified intravenous drug abuse as the most significant predictor for final ASES score [F(1,18) = 6.12, p = .024, adjusted R2 = .254]. Conclusion: Following isolated shoulder joint sepsis, infection clearance and acceptable functional outcomes can be achieved using surgical I&D followed by a course of antibiotics, but outcomes are variable. Level of evidence: IV | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Infection؛ Native؛ Outcomes؛ Sepsis؛ Shoulder؛ Treatment | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Kennedy N, Chambers ST, Nolan I, Gallagher K, Werno A, Browne M, et al. Native joint septic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, and microbiological causes in a New Zealand population. The Journal of rheumatology. 2015; 42(12):2392-7. 2. Mathews CJ, Weston VC, Jones A, Field M, Coakley G. Bacterial septic arthritis in adults. Lancet. 2010; 375(9717):846-855. 3. Assunção JH, Noffs GG, Malavolta EA, Gracitelli MEC, Lima ALM, Ferreira Neto AA. Septic arthritis of the shoulder and elbow: one decade of epidemiological analysis at a tertiary referral hospital. Rev Bras Ortop. 2018; 53(6):707-713. 4. Maneiro JR, Souto A, Cervantes EC, Mera A, Carmona L, Gomez-Reino JJ. Predictors of treatment failure and mortality in native septic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2015; 34(11):1961-1967. 5. Cleeman E, Auerbach JD, Klingenstein GG, Flatow EL. Septic arthritis of the glenohumeral joint: a review of 23 cases. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2005;14(2):102-107. 6. Sweet MC, Sheena GJ, Liu S, Fisk FE, Lynch JR, Muh SJ. Clinical Characteristics and Long-term Outcomes After Septic Arthritis of the Native Glenohumeral Joint: A 20-Year Retrospective Review. Orthopedics. 2019; 42(1):e118-e123. 7. Cho C-H, Oh G-M. Prognostic Factors Affecting the Clinical Outcome of Septic Arthritis of the Shoulder. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2016; 21(3):339-344. 8. Abdel MP, Perry KI, Morrey ME, Steinmann SP, Sperling JW, Cass JR. Arthroscopic management of native shoulder septic arthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(3):418-421. 9. Duncan SFM, Sperling JW. Treatment of Primary Isolated Shoulder Sepsis in the Adult Patient. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(6):1392-1396. 10. Klinger H-M, Baums MH, Freche S, Nusselt T, Spahn G, Steckel H. Septic arthritis of the shoulder joint: an analysis of management and outcome. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76(5):598-603. 11. Smith AM, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Outcomes are poor after treatment of sepsis in the rheumatoid shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 439:68-73. 12. Themistocleous G, Zalavras C, Stine I, Zachos V, Itamura J. Prolonged implantation of an antibiotic cement spacer for management of shoulder sepsis in compromised patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16(6):701-705. 13. Jeon I-H, Choi C-H, Seo J-S, Seo K-J, Ko S-H, Park J-Y. Arthroscopic management of septic arthritis of the shoulder joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(8):1802-1806. 14. Lossos IS, Yossepowitch O, Kandel L, Yardeni D, Arber N. Septic arthritis of the glenohumeral joint. A report of 11 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 1998; 77(3):177-187. 15. Lansky A, Finlayson T, Johnson C, Holtzman D, Wejnert C, Mitsch A, et al. Estimating the number of persons who inject drugs in the United States by meta-analysis to calculate national rates of HIV and hepatitis C virus infections. PloS one. 2014; 9(5):e97596. 16. Padegimas EM, Nicholson TA, Silva S, Ramsey ML, Williams GR, Lazarus MD, et al. Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty performed for postinfectious arthritis. Clinics in orthopedic surgery. 2018; 10(3):344. 17. Stutz G, Kuster MS, Kleinstück F, Gächter A. Arthroscopic management of septic arthritis: stages of infection and results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(5):270-274. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 630 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 391 |
||