Skin Tenting in Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 9، شماره 4، مهر و آبان 2021، صفحه 418-422 اصل مقاله (448.57 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2020.45004.2230 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Dafang Zhang* ؛ Brandon E. Earp؛ George S.M. Dyer | ||
| 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA 2 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: The objectives of this study were to (1) identify factors associated with skin tenting in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures and (2) analyze individual surgeon variation in this diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at two Level I trauma centers of 396 patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures treated by 47 surgeons with open reduction internal fixation from January 2010 to March 2019. Our main outcome measure was skin tenting, as diagnosed by the treating surgeon and used as an indication for surgical treatment. Results: Skin tenting was diagnosed by the treating surgeon in 34 out of 396 patients (9%) with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that lower BMI (P=0.002) and fracture shortening (P=0.03) were independently associated with skin tenting in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. There was wide variation among surgeons in the rate of diagnosis of skin tenting, ranging from 0% to 41% prevalence of skin tenting depending on the treating surgeon (p <0.0001). Conclusion: Although lower BMI and greater fracture shortening were associated with skin tenting, the diagnosis is subjective. We found wide variation in the diagnosis of skin tenting, even among surgeons within a single metropolitan area. Level of evidence: III | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Body mass index؛ Displaced clavicle fracture؛ Midshaft clavicle fracture؛ Skin tenting؛ Surgeon variation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Ahrens PM, Garlick NI, Barber J, Tims EM. The clavicle trial: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing operative with nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. JBJS. 2017; 99(16):1345-54. 2. McKee MD, Kreder HJ, Mandel S, McCormack R, Reindl R, Pugh DM, et al. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society: Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures-a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am A. 2007; 89:1-0. 3. Qvist AH, Væsel MT, Jensen CM, Jensen SL. Plate fixation compared with nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a randomized clinical trial. Bone Joint J. 2018; 100(10):1385-91. 4. Tamaoki MJ, Matsunaga FT, da Costa AR, Netto NA, Matsumoto MH, Belloti JC. Treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: figure-of-eight harness versus anterior plate osteosynthesis: a randomized controlled trial. JBJS. 2017; 99(14):1159-65. 5. Woltz S, Stegeman SA, Krijnen P, van Dijkman BA, van Thiel TP, Schep NW, et al. Plate fixation compared with nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. JBJS. 2017; 99(2):106-12. 6. Chalmers PN, Van GT, Ferry ST. Is Skin Tenting Secondary to Displaced Clavicle Fracture More Than a Theoretical Risk? A Report of 2 Adolescent Cases. American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, NJ). 2015; 44(10):E414-6. 7. Kirmani SJ, Pillai SK, Madegowda BR. Vertical fragment in adult midshaft clavicle fractures: an indicator for surgical intervention. Orthopedics. 2009; 32(10). 8. Persico F, Lorenz E, Seligson D. Complications of operative treatment of clavicle fractures in a Level I Trauma Center. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. 2014; 24(6):839-44. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 653 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 374 |
||