A Systematic Review of Self-Reported Outcome Measures Assessing Disability Following Hand and Upper Extremity Conditions in Persian Population | ||
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
مقاله 2، دوره 9، شماره 2، خرداد 2021، صفحه 141-151 اصل مقاله (595.13 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2020.48859.2423 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Erfan Shafiee1؛ Maryam Farzad* 2؛ Mahdieh Karbalaei3 | ||
1Department of Physical Therapy and Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada | ||
2Department of Physical Therapy and Surgery, University of Western Ontario, Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph’s Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
3Department of Occupational Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Background: Disability following hand and upper extremity conditions is common. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) are used to capture patients’ status subjectively. This review has aimed to synthesis the literature regarding the extent and methodological quality of translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the hand and upper extremity disability PROs in the Persian language. Methods: Seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psychinfo, Scopus, ISI, Science direct, and Google Scholar) were searched until May 2020. Studies reporting cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties testing of the Persian validated disability PROs of the hand and upper extremity were identified. We appraised the eligible studies using Guidelines for the Process of Cross-cultural Adaptation of Self-report Measures and COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) risk of bias checklist. Results: Out of 98 identified records, 22 studies on 17 PROs were reviewed. Most of the PROs (47%) were regionspecific and the others were condition-specific (29%) and multi-region (24%). Most of the studies (67%) followed 80 to 100% of the recommended steps for cross-cultural adaptation and translation of a PRO. The evidence of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity was available for all the PROs. Structural validity, measurement error, and responsiveness were evaluated for five, six, and four PROs, respectively. The overall risk of bias ranged from “inadequate” to “very good” for all studies. Conclusion: A reasonable number of PROs for the evaluation of hand and upper extremity disability are available in the Persian language. Although all of them are not of very good psychometric properties, they all have sufficient quality to be used in clinical settings. Level of evidence: II | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Cross-cultural adaptation؛ Disability؛ Hand and upper extremity؛ Patient-reported outcome measure؛ Psychometric properties | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Ameri M, Aghakhani K, Ameri E, Mehrpisheh S, Memarian A. Epidemiology of the Upper Extremity Trauma in a Traumatic Center in Iran. Glob J Health Sci. 2017;9(4):97-105. 2. Wenzinger E, Rivera-Barrios A, Gonzalez G, Herrera F. Trends in Upper Extremity Injuries Presenting to US Emergency Departments. Hand. 2019 ;14(3):408-12. 3. MacDermid JC. Patient-reported outcomes: State-ofthe- art hand surgery and future applications. Hand Clin. 2014; 30(3):293-304. 4. Jayakumar P, Overbeek CL, Lamb S, Williams M, Funes C, Gwilym S, et al. What factors are associated with disability after upper extremity injuries? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018; 476(11):2190- 215. 5. De Putter CE, Selles RW, Polinder S, Panneman MJM, Hovius SER, Van Beeck EF. Economic impact of hand and wrist injuries: Health-care costs and productivity costs in a population-based study. J Bone Jt Surg. 2012 ;94(9):e56. 6. Döring AC, Nota SPFT, Hageman MGJS, Ring DC. Measurement of upper extremity disability using the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system. J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39(6):1160-5. 7. Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: What is it and what is it for? Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25(11-12):596-601. 8. St-Pierre C, Desmeules F, Dionne CE, Frémont P, MacDermid JC, Roy JS. Psychometric properties of self-reported questionnaires for the evaluation of with rotator cuff disorders: A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2016; 38(2):103-22. 9. Jayakumar P, Williams M, Ring D, Lamb S, Gwilym S. A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Assessing Disability Following Upper Extremity Trauma. JAAOS Glob Res Rev. 2017; 1(4) 10. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000; 25(24):3186-91. 11. Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68(4):435-41. 12. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46(12):1417-32 13. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60(1):34-42. 14. Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias. J Cranio- Maxillofacial Surg. 2011; 39(2):91-2. 15. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010; 19(4):539-49. 16. Menezes Costa L da C, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Costa LOP. Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill Pain Questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62(9):934-43. 17. Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5):1147-57. 18. Terwee CB, Prinsen CA, Chiarotto A, Cw De Vet H, Bouter LM, Marjan JA, et al. COSMIN. Amsterdam,The Netherlands. VU University Medical Center. 2018 [Updated 2019 February]. Available from: https:// www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-systreview- for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018.pdf 19. Mahmoudi Hashemi F, Mousavi J, Attarbashi Moghadam B, Talebian Moaghadam S, Mousavi S. Cross cultural adaptation, Validity and Reliability study of the Persian version of the American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) Questionnaire for evaluation of shoulder function in injured athletes. J Mod Rehabil. 2013; 7(1): 34-39. 20. Negahban H, Behtash Z, Sohani SM, Salehi R. Responsiveness of two Persian-versions of shoulder outcome measures following physiotherapy intervention in patients with shoulder disorders. Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 37(24):2300-4. 21. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Birjandinejad A, Golhasani F, Moradi A, Vahedi E, Kachooei AR. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability testing of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in the Persian population with shoulder problems. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015; 38(1):84-7. 22. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Birjandinejad A, Razi S, Mardani- Kivi M, Kachooei AR. Oxford shoulder score: A crosscultural adaptation and validation study of the Persian version in Iran. Iran J Med Sci. 2015; 40(5):404. 23. Naghdi S, Nakhostin Ansari N, Rustaie N, Akbari M, Ebadi S, Senobari M, et al. Simple shoulder test and Oxford Shoulder Score: Persian translation and crosscultural validation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015; 135(12):1707-18. 24. Olyaei GR, Mousavi SJ, Montazeri A, Malmir K. Translation and Validation Study of the Persian Version of the Oxford Shoulder Instabilit. J Mod Rehabil . 2016; 28:24-8. 25. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Vahedi E, Baradaran A, Birjandinejad A, Seyyed-Hoseinian SH, Bagheri F, et al. Psychometric properties of the persian version of the simple shoulder test (SST) questionnaire. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016; 4(4):387. 26. Mousavi SJ, Hadian MR, Abedi M, Montazeri A. Translation and validation study of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Clin Rheumatol. 2009; 28(3):293-9. 27. Negahban H, Mohtasebi E, Goharpey S. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Persian version of Shoulder Activity Scale in a group of patients with shoulder disorders. Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 37(19):1777-82. 28. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Kachooei AR, Vahedi E, Moradi A, Mashayekhi Z, Hallaj-Moghaddam M, et al. Validity and cross-cultural adaptation of the persian version of the oxford elbow score. Int J Rheumatol. 2014; 2014 (10):381237. 29. Farazdaghi MR, Mansoori A, Vosoughi O, Kordi Yoosefinejad A. Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Persian version of Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire. Rheumatol Int. 2017; 37(5):743-50. 30. Mansoori A, Noorizadeh Dehkordi S, Mansour Sohani S, Nodehi Moghadam A. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Determination of the Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) Questionnaire in Iranian Tennis Players. Funct Disabil J. 2019; 2(1):17-26. 31. Jafarian FS, Barati H, Sadeghi-Demneh E. The Patient- Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire was successfully translated to Persian. J Hand Ther. 2020; In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2019.12.005 32. Shafiee E, Farzad M, Macdermid J, Smaeel Beygi A, Vafaei A, Farhoud A. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Patient- Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation for the Persian language. Hand Ther. 2020;In press. https://doi. org/10.1177/1758998320910177 33. Fadavi-Ghaffari M, Azad A, Shariatzadeh H, Taghizadeh G, Aminizadeh S. Translation, Cultural Adaptation, Face and Content Validity of the Persian Version “Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation” (PRWE-Persian) Questionnaire. J Mod Rehabil. 2017; 11 (1):51-62. 34. Hassankhani GG, Vahedi E, Moradi A, Hoseinian SHS, Jahani Z, Rahmani M, et al. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the patient rated wrist evaluation. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017; 5(4):243. 35. Hassankhani GG, Moradi A, Birjandinejad A, Vahedi E, Kachooei AR, Ebrahimzadeh MH. Translation and validation of the Persian version the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018; 6(1):71. 36. Kordi Yoosefinejad A, Motealleh A, Babakhani M. Evaluation of validity and reliability of the Persian version of the functional index of hand osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2017; 37(5):719-25. 37. Farzad M, MacDermid JC, Asgary A, Shafiee E, Azizi H. The patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation was successfully translated to Persian. J Hand Ther. 2019; 32(4):515-8. 38. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Birjandinejad A, Kachooei AR ez. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire among Persian population. Hand Surg. 2015; 20(01):25-31. 39. Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Abedi M, Askary-Ashtiani A, Karimi A, Khorsandi A, et al. Cultural adaptation and validation of the persian version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome measure. Clin Rehabil. 2008; 22(8):749-57. 40. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Moradi A, Vahedi E, Kachooei AR, Birjandinejad A. Validity and reliability of the persian version of shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (quick‑DASH). Int J Prev Med. 2015; 6:59. 41. Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and Its Short Version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society Standardized Shoulder . Arthritis Care Res. 2011; 63(S11):S174-88. 42. Bhandari M, Petrisor B, Schemitsch E. Outcome measurements in orthopedic. Indian J Orthop. 2007; 41(1):32. 43. Kleinlugtenbelt Y V., Nienhuis RW, Bhandari M, Goslings JC, Poolman RW, Scholtes VAB. Are validated outcome measures used in distal radial fractures truly valid? A critical assessment using the Consensusbased Standards For The Selection Of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Bone Joint Res. 2016; 5(4):153-61. 44. Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5):1171-9. 45. Sijtsma K. On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika. 2009; 74(1):107. 46. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011; 2:53. 47. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. USA. Oxford University Press; 2015. 48. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. QUAL LIFE RES. 2010;19(4):539-49.; 49. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10(1):22. 50. Bobos P, Ziebart C, Furtado R, Lu Z, MacDermid JC. Psychometric properties of the global rating of change scales in patients with low back pain, upper and lower extremity disorders. A systematic review with metaanalysis. J Orthop. 2020; 21:40-8. 51. Beaton D, Richards RR. Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1998; 7(6):565-72. 52. Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2002; 11(6):587-94. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 895 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 558 |