Arthroscopic Recession Technique in the Surgery of Tennis Elbow by Sharp Cutting the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis (ECRB) Tendon Origin | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 9، شماره 2، خرداد 2021، صفحه 174-179 اصل مقاله (670.58 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2020.48173.2383 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohamad Behazin1؛ : Amir R. Kachooei* 2 | ||
| 1Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 21 Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran 2 Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson Univesity, Philadelphia, USA | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to assess the functional outcomes and time to improve after the modified arthroscopic technique (recession technique) by using a knife to sharply cut the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) tendon origin in patients with recalcitrant tennis elbow. Methods: In a prospective study, we included 11 consecutive patients. Following the routine elbow arthroscopy and after exposing the ECRB tendon, we used a knife (no. 11 blade) to cut the tendon at the level of radiocapitellar articulation while avoiding the lateral collateral ligament, which is considered a tendon recession as is done in spastic muscles. Patients were followed up for 1, 3, 6, and 12 month intervals and were asked to fill the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder Hand (QuickDASH), and Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE). Results: The mean PRTEE, QuickDASH, and MEPI scores showed significant improvement over time (p <0.001). There were 5 excellent, 5 good and 1 fair results based on MEPI. The patient with fair result was the only patient with existing varus instability on examination under anesthesia although we could not elicit the test positive on clinical examination. Substantial functional and pain improvement was reported almost 6 months after surgery. We did not find any nerve injury or post-operative infection. Conclusion: Arthroscopic recession surgery by using a knife is a safe and effective way in managing recalcitrant tennis elbow although patients should be informed of the expected time to improve. A simple tendon recession by a sharp cut is a time-saving technique that works effectively and is comparable with the piecemeal shaving. Clinical Relevance: The modified muscle recession technique is a rapid and safe way to manage the recalcitrant tennis elbow arthroscopically while the outcomes are comparable to the routine piecemeal shaving of the pathologic tissue. Level of evidence: IV | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Arthroscopy؛ ECRB؛ Recession؛ Tennis elbow | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, Ransom JE, Smith J, Morrey BF. The epidemiology and health care burden of tennis elbow: a population-based study. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(5):1066-71. 2. Pierce TP, Issa K, Gilbert BT, Hanly B, Festa A, McInerney VK, et al. A systematic review of tennis elbow surgery: open versus arthroscopic versus percutaneous release of the common extensor origin. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2017;33(6):1260-8. 3. Kachooei AR, Talaei-Khoei M, Faghfouri A, Ring D. Factors associated with operative treatment of enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2016;25(4):666-70. 4. Claessen FM, Heesters BA, Chan JJ, Kachooei AR, Ring D. A meta-analysis of the effect of corticosteroid injection for enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin. The Journal of hand surgery. 2016;41(10):988-98. e2. 5. Vaquero-Picado A, Barco R, Antuña SA. Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow. EFORT open reviews. 2016;1(11):391-7. 6. Field LD. Editorial Commentary: Dealer’s Choice for Arthroscopic Versus Open Lateral Epicondylitis Release? It’s Not That Simple. Elsevier; 2018. 7. Claessen FM, Kachooei AR, Kolovich GP, Buijze GA, Oh LS, van den Bekerom MP, et al. Portal placement in elbow arthroscopy by novice surgeons: cadaver study. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2017;25(7):2247-54. 8. Kalainov DM, Makowiec RL, Cohen MS. Arthroscopic Tennis Elbow Release. Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery. 2007;11(1):2-7. 9. Vasileiadis GI, Ramazanian T, Kamaci S, Bachman DR, Park SE, Thaveepunsan S, et al. Loss of pronation-supination in patients with heterotopic ossification around the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(7):1406-10. 10. Clark T, McRae S, Leiter J, Zhang Y, Dubberley J, MacDonald P. Arthroscopic Versus Open Lateral Release for the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2018;34(12):3177-84. 11. Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2006;20(8):S127. 12. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602-8. 13. Rompe JD, Overend TJ, MacDermid JC. Validation of the Patient-rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire. J Hand Ther. 2007;20(1):3-10; quiz 1. 14. Field LD. Editorial commentary: the needle or the knife? platelet-rich plasma versus surgery for lateral epicondylitis. Elsevier; 2017. 15. Hoy G, Wood T, Phillips N, Connell D. When physiology becomes pathology: the role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating bone marrow oedema in the humerus in elite tennis players with an upper limb pain syndrome. British journal of sports medicine. 2006;40(8):710-3. 16. Saremi H, Seyedan MA. MID TERM RESULTS OF ARTHROSCOPIC RELEASE OF TENNIS ELBOW, PRELIMINARY REPORT IN IRAN. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2018;6(supple):7-. 17. Othman AMA. Arthroscopic versus percutaneous release of common extensor origin for treatment of chronic tennis elbow. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(3):383-8. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 693 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 438 |
||