Anthropometric Measurements of Distal Femur to Design the Femoral Component of Total Knee Arthroplasty for the Iranian Population | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| دوره 8، شماره 3، مرداد 2020، صفحه 400-406 اصل مقاله (746.71 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2018.32420.1861 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ali Birjandinejad1؛ Reza Zandi2؛ elham karimi* 3 | ||
| 1Orthopedic Research Center, Shahid Kamyab Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| 2Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Acquiring knowledge about anatomic and geometric quantities of bones is among the most vital parameters in orthopedic surgery that has a significant effect on the treatment of various disorders and subsequent outcomes. The aim of this study was to obtain anthropometric information for distal femur in order to compare with similar dimensions of prosthesis used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery and to design more suitable and optimal components. Methods: Morphological data of distal femur were measured in 132 knees (81 males and 51 females) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The data included anterior-posterior (AP) length, medial-lateral (ML) width, medial AP (MAP), lateral AP (LAP), MAP to LAP distance in the anterior distal femur namely anterior medial lateral (AML) width, medial and lateral condyle width, and intercondylar notch. The aspect ratio (ML/AP) was also calculated and the results were compared with similar dimensions of currently used knee implants. Results: Our data showed that men are significantly larger in all dimensions than women. In the distal femur with similar AP lengths in both sexes, women had a smaller ML width than men (p <0.001). Comparison between the distal femur and studied prostheses showed no high correlation and similarity between the femoral component and femoral condyle prostheses in the resected surface of the bone. Conclusion: The results of this study can provide the data needed to design prostheses suitable for the Iranian population. Level of evidence: III | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Anthropometric؛ Distal femur؛ Knee؛ Magnetic resonance imaging؛ Prosthesis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Lowe CJ, Barker KL, Dewey M, Sackley CM. Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise after knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Bmj. 2007; 335(7624):812. 2. Poitras S, Avouac J, Rossignol M, Avouac B, Cedraschi C, Nordin M, Rousseaux C, Rozenberg S, Savarieau B, Thoumie P, Valat JP. A critical appraisal of guidelines for the management of knee osteoarthritis using Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation criteria. Arthritis research & therapy. 2007; 9(6):R126... 3. Chuang SH, Huang MH, Chen TW, Weng MC, Liu CW, Chen CH. Effect of knee sleeve on static and dynamic balance in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences. 2007; 23(8):405-11. 4. Divine JG, Hewett TE. Valgus bracing for degenerative knee osteoarthritis: relieving pain, improving gait, and increasing activity. The Physician and sportsmedicine. 2005; 33(2):40-6. 5. Mazzuca SA, Page MC, Meldrum RD, Brandt KD, Petty‐ Saphon S. Pilot study of the effects of a heat‐retaining knee sleeve on joint pain, stiffness, and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care & Research: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology. 2004; 51(5):716-21. 6. Haim A, Rozen N, Dekel S, Halperin N, Wolf A. Control of knee coronal plane moment via modulation of center of pressure: a prospective gait analysis study. Journal of biomechanics. 2008; 41(14):3010-6. 7. Goldberg VM, Figgie 3rd HE, Figgie MP. Technical considerations in total knee surgery. Management of patella problems. The Orthopedic clinics of North America. 1989; 20(2):189-99. 8. Ranawat CS. The patellofemoral joint in total condylar knee arthroplasty. Pros and cons based on five-to tenyear follow-up observations. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1986 (205):93-9. 9. Fehring TK, Valadie AL. Knee instability after total knee arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1994 (299):157-62. 10. Ho WP, Cheng CK, Liau JJ. Morphometrical measurements of resected surface of femurs in Chinese knees: correlation to the sizing of current femoral implants. The Knee. 2006; 13(1):12-4. 11. Hitt K, Shurman JR, Greene K, McCarthy J, Moskal J, Hoeman T, Mont MA. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. JBJS. 2003; 85(suppl_4):115-22. 12. Conley S, Rosenberg A, Crowninshield R. The female knee: anatomic variations. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2007; 15:S31-6. 13. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 1996; 331:35-46. 14. Chin KR, Dalury DF, Scott RD. Comparative measurement of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2002; 15:213-7. 15. Campbell WC, Canale ST, Beaty JH. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby. 16. Biau D, Mullins MM, Judet T, Piriou P. Is anyone too old for a total knee replacement?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2006; 448:180-4. 17. Noble PC, Gordon MJ, Weiss JM, Reddix RN, Conditt MA, Mathis KB. Does total knee replacement restore normal knee function? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2005; 431:157-65. 18. Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Ai S, Tang T, Rubash HE, Li G. Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and white men and women. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2011; 26(1):124-30. 19. Vaidya SV, Ranawat CS, Aroojis A, Laud NS. Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian population. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2000; 15(1):79-85. 20. Cheng FB, Ji XF, Lai Y, Feng JC, Zheng WX, Sun YF, et al. Three dimensional morphometry of the knee to design the total knee arthroplasty for Chinese population. The Knee. 2009; 16(5):341-7. 21. Lim HC, Bae JH, Yoon JY, Kim SJ, Kim JG, Lee JM. Gender differences of the morphology of the distal femur and proximal tibia in a Korean population. The Knee. 2013; 20(1):26-30. 22. Mahfouz MR, Merkl BC, Abdel Fatah EE, Booth Jr R, Argenson JN. Automatic methods for characterization of sexual dimorphism of adult femora: distal femur. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. 2007; 10(6):447-56. 23. Dargel J, Michael JW, Feiser J, Ivo R, Koebke J. Human knee joint anatomy revisited: morphometry in the light of sex-specific total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2011; 26(3):346-53. 24. Yue B, Wang J, Wang Y, Yan M, Zhang J, Zeng Y. How the gender or morphological specific TKA prosthesis improves the component fit in the Chinese population?. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2014; 29(1):71-4. 25. Hussain F, Kadir A, Rafiq M, Zulkifly AH, Sa’at A, Aziz AA, Hossain M, Kamarul T, Syahrom A. Anthropometric measurements of the human distal femur: a study of the adult Malay population. BioMed research international. 2013; 2013. 26. Chaichankul C, Tanavalee A, Itiravivong P. Anthropometric measurements of knee joints in Thai population: correlation to the sizing of current knee prostheses. The Knee. 2011; 18(1):5-10. 27. Moghtadaei M, Moghimi J, Farahini H, Jahansouz A. Morphology of proximal tibia in Iranian population and its correlation with available prostheses. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2015; 29:225. 28. Merchant AC, Arendt EA, Dye SF, Fredericson M, Grelsamer RP, Leadbetter WB, Post WR, Teitge RA. The female knee: anatomic variations and the femalespecific total knee design. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2008; 466(12):3059-65. 29. Baker K, Goggins J, Xie H, Szumowski K, LaValley M, Hunter DJ, Felson DT. A randomized crossover trial of a wedged insole for treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2007; 56(4):1198-203. 30. Fehring TK, Murphy JA, Hayes TD, Roberts DW, Pomeroy DL, Griffin WL. The Coventry Award Paper: Factors Influencing Wear and Osteolysis in Press- Fit Condylar Modular Total Knee Replacements. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2004; 428:40-50. 31. Himanen AK, Belt E, Nevalainen J, Hämäläinen M, Lehto MU. Survival of the AGC total knee arthroplasty is similar for arthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis: Finnish Arthroplasty Register report on 8 467 operations carried out between 1985 and 1999. Acta orthopaedica. 2005; 76(1):85-8. 32. Rand JA, Ilstrup DM. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 1991; 73(3):397- 409. 33. Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. JBJS. 2003; 85(2):259-65. 34. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 2001; 72(5):503-13. 35. Booth RE. The gender-specific (female) knee. Orthopedics. 2006; 29(9):768-9. 36. Barrett WP. The need for gender-specific prostheses in TKA: does size make a difference?. Orthopedics. 2006; 29(9):S53. 37. Dorr LD, Boiardo RA. Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1986 (205):5-11. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 469 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 436 |
||
