Measurement Properties of the Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) and the Revised Short McGill Pain Questionnaire-Version-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in Painrelated Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review Protocol | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 8، شماره 2، خرداد 2020، صفحه 131-141 اصل مقاله (430.23 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2020.36779.1973 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Samuel Jumbo* 1؛ Joy MacDermid2؛ Michael E. Kalu3؛ Tara L. Packham3؛ George S. Athwal4؛ Kenneth J. Faber4 | ||
| 1Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada | ||
| 2Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada---- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph’s Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada | ||
| 3School of Rehabilitation Science, McMasters University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada | ||
| 4Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph’s Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) and Revised Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2 (SF-MPQ-2) are generic pain assessment tools used in research and practice for pain assessment in musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. A comprehensive review that systematically analyses their measurement properties in MSK conditions has not been performed. This review protocol describes the steps that will be taken to locate, critically appraise, compare and summarize clinical measurement research on the BPI-SF and SF-MPQ-2 in pain-related MSK conditions. Methods: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus will be searched for publications that examine the measurement properties of the Brief Pain Inventory and Revised Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2. Two reviewers will independently screen citations (title, abstract and full text) and extract relevant data. The extensiveness, rigor, and quality of measurement property reports will be examined with a structured measurement studies appraisal tool, and with the updated COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Findings will be descriptively summarized, and when possible, a meta-analysis will be performed. Discussion: This review will summarize and compare the current level of evidence on the measurement properties of the BPI-SF and SF-MPQ-2 in a spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions. We expect clinicians/researchers dealing with MSK conditions to have synthesized evidence that informs their decision making and preferences. In addition, the review hopes to identify gaps and determine priorities for future research with or on the BPI-SF and SF-MPQ-2 in MSK conditions. Level of evidence: Not Applicable | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Brief pain inventory؛ McGill pain questionnaire؛ Musculoskeletal conditions؛ Patient reported outcomes؛ Psychometrics properties؛ Systematic review | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
LM, de Vet HC, et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). User Manual. 2018; 78(1):6-63. 14. Prinsen CA, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HC, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5):1147-57. 15. MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39(5):400-17. 16. Packham T, MacDermid JC, Henry J, Bain J. A systematic review of psychometric evaluations of outcome assessments for complex regional pain syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34(13):1059-69. 17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. 18. Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009; 18(8):1115-23. 19. Law MC, MacDermid J. Evidence-based rehabilitation: a guide to practice. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Slack Incooperated; 2008. 20. Mehta SP, MacDermid JC, Richardson J, MacIntyre NJ, Grewal R. A systematic review of the measurement properties of the patient-rated wrist evaluation. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2015; 45(4):289-98. 21. Mokkink LB, de Vet HC, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patientreported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5):1171-9. 22. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60(1):34-42. 23. Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, et al. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” - a practical guideline. Trials. 2016; 17(1):449. 24. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for healthrelated patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(7):737-45. 1. Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, et al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73(6):968-74. 2. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015; 386(9995):743-800. 3. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008; 9(2):105-21. 4. Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013; 346(1):f167. 5. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994; 23(2):129-38. 6. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Revicki DA, Harding G, Coyne KS, Peirce-Sandner S, et al. Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Pain. 2009; 144(1):35-42. 7. Kachooei AR, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Erfani-Sayyar R, Salehi M, Salimi E, Razi S. Short form-mcgill pain questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2): a cross-cultural adaptation and validation study of the persian version in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arch bone Jt Surg. 2015; 3(1):45-50. 8. Cleeland CS. The brief pain inventory user guide. Houston, TX: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; 2009. 9. Chen TH, Li L, Kochen MM. A systematic review: how to choose appropriate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in routine general practice? J Zhejiang Univ Sci. 2005; 6(9):936-40. 10. Robinson-Papp J, George MC, Dorfman D, Simpson DM. Barriers to chronic pain measurement: a qualitative study of patient perspectives. Pain Med. 2015; 16(7):1256-64. 11. Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Bransford RJ, DeVine J, McGirt MJ, et al. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(21 Suppl):S54-68. 12. Ramasamy A, Martin ML, Blum SI, Liedgens H, Argoff C, Freynhagen R, et al. Assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments to assess chronic low back pain. Pain Med. 2017; 18(6):1098-110. 13. Mokkink LB, Prinsen C, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC, et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). User Manual. 2018; 78(1):6-63. 14. Prinsen CA, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HC, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5):1147-57. 15. MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39(5):400-17. 16. Packham T, MacDermid JC, Henry J, Bain J. A systematic review of psychometric evaluations of outcome assessments for complex regional pain syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34(13):1059-69. 17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. 18. Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009; 18(8):1115-23. 19. Law MC, MacDermid J. Evidence-based rehabilitation: a guide to practice. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Slack Incooperated; 2008. 20. Mehta SP, MacDermid JC, Richardson J, MacIntyre NJ, Grewal R. A systematic review of the measurement properties of the patient-rated wrist evaluation. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2015; 45(4):289-98. 21. Mokkink LB, de Vet HC, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patientreported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5):1171-9. 22. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60(1):34-42. 23. Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, et al. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” - a practical guideline. Trials. 2016; 17(1):449. 24. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for healthrelated patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(7):737-45. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,315 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,836 |
||